Bowman Russell, although he only had a fourth-grade education he was an American polymath known for his achievements as a
painter, sculptor, author and builder and less well known as a natural philosopher and for his unified theory in physics and
cosmogony. Born: May 19, 1871 Died: 1963
“[Russell was] the Leonardo Da Vinci (IQ=205) of our time.”
— Walter Cronkite (1963)
though Walter Russell only had a fourth-grade education, he was a genius.”
Wrong conclusions from correct mathematics. Oahspe Book of Cosmology and
Prophecy: Chapter III: 17.. A man may prophesy by a traveling wagon what time it will reach town; but the correctness of his prophecy does not prove that the wagon pushed the horse to town.
"I couldn't help feel that sometimes
scientists get attached to an idea with an almost religious ferver, so that no facts can dissuade them." - Page 208 of Our Mathematical Universe (2014) by By Max Tegmark
(physics professor at at MIT).
Difference between Albert Einstein's science and Oahspe
The mc2 of E=mc2 is composed of the speed of light squared and you know what Oahspe says about the speed or travel
of light. Also Relativity denies the existence of an Ether, and Einstein's new relativistic ether has no motion according
to Einstein, and Oahspe says give ethe motion 100 or 99, ether has definite motion (vortex motion).
the Sagnac experiment results and supported the Michael-Morely experiment result of no ether. Also Einstein (and Relativity)
says Gravity is the result of the MASS of an object warping space-time, whereas Oahspe says gravity and mass is the
manifestation (result) of vortex (ether) MOTION.
Einstein and his Relativity theories are a MAJOR part
of the Standard Model.
I have been asked if Walter Russell copied some of
his ideas from Oahspe, I said no. OAHSPE. 25. Neither are, nor were, the revelations within this
OAHSPE wholly new to mortals. The same things have been revealed
at the same time unto many, who live at remote distances from
one another, but who were not in correspondence till afterward. http://www.sacred-texts.com/oah/oah/oah07.htm -
THE SECRET OF LIGHT 1947 BY
Walter Russell page vii Concerning The Divine Illiad The Divine Iliad is the basis of this book. The Divine Iliad is
an inspired message from the Creator to give man the needed comprehension
[understanding] of his relation to his universe, to man, and to God, for the coming cycle. Man progresses in cycles of approximately twenty-five hundred
[2,500] years. At the beginning [dawn, 33, 99-100, 111, 165, 200 dan]
of each cycle of his growing [seed] awareness of the Light [Ethe] within him, God [Jehovih] sends messages through
prepared messengers to futher his comprehension [understanding] of the Light [Spirit]. -
in cycles. New comprehension periodically transforms mankind into higher beings. A new cycle of three thousand years duration is now in its birth throes. - The
Secret of Light by Walter Russell
58. Dan'ha (Panic). The etherea, the highest place in ethereal worlds. Jehovih
said: The sun I made as the head of a serpent, and his phalanx made I as the body of a serpent; thus made I the great corporeal
serpent. To him gave I a circuit to travel in, and I numbered his time a thousand tuos and seven aka and four bi'jus *(Equal
to four million seven hundred thousand years), for the sun coil. On the circuit have I placed my A'ji and my Ji'ay in many
places, but my Dan'ha have I placed only in one thousand six hundred
places [1600 cycles = 1600 seasons which is comparable to 4 seasons of the earth's orbit arond the sun, 16 is divisible
by 4 = 4 x 4 = 16]. (A cycle of time is about three thousand
years, sometimes more, sometimes less.) From Kosmon, the present time, back to Moses and Capilya, alias Capella,
three thousand four hundred years; from Moses and Capilya to Brahma and Abraham, two thousand four hundred years; from Brahma
and Abraham to Zarathustra, three thousand one hundred years; from Zarathustra to Osiris the first, three thousand three hundred
years; from Osiris to Thor, three thousand two hundred years; from Thor to Apollo, two thousand eight hundred years; from
Apollo to Sue, three thousand two hundred years; from Sue to Aph, three thousand six hundred years. Dan'ya, the orbit
of the solar phalanx (Gau). Dian'ya, the course of the cosmical phalanx (Puit). The light of Dan'ga is my timekeeper (Vede).
Dh'a'yi, the light shining; the soul-fructifier (Pali). When Dang'hi cometh, the All-men grow in spirit; when he is past,
man whetteth the sword and spear and entereth into blood. http://www.sacred-texts.com/oah/oah/oah417.htm -
1947 was a warm up-spike year, time of dan of Kosmon, and the 3rd rule of prophecy year (1848 + 99 = 1947). http://www.longrangeweather.com/1900ad.htm OAHSPE'S BOOK OF COSMOGONY Chapter 8:1 ...To ethe give
motion one hundred, or ninety-nine (as the case may be). Motion
is time, the time of ethe is 99 or 100. Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy Chapter VIII:2. Ethe, being the time of light, is named dan. The motion or time of dan is 99 or 100. 1848 + 99 = 1947 a warm (dan) up-spike year. Oahspe
says dan ...is the time of prophecy and inspiration, and the time of spirituality amongst mortals. In 1947 Walter Russell
published his very spiritual book "The Secret of Light". The next year (100 dan) Walter Russell published his
very spiritual book "The Message of The Divine Illiad Vol.I".
Book of Cosmology and Prophecy CHAPTER VII:
The time of dan ...it is the time of spirituality amongst mortals, and the time of prophecy and inspiration,
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy CHAPTER VII: 15. ...the periods of inspiration, and periods of darkness, are not haphazard. ** 18. These periods will be found to come under certain numbers, 11, 33, 66, 99, 100, 200, 400, 666, 333, 66, 18, 500, 600, 365, 99, 33, 18, and so on. In Oahspe the ethe'ic wave (99 or 100) is associated with Dan
(light). The third algorithm (set
of rules to be followed in calculations) of prophecy
is to add 99 to the base of 1848. ** haphazard definition: 1. characterized by lack of order or planning, by irregularity, or by randomness;
determined by or dependent on chance; aimless. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/haphazard - ...We had no control over you, but merely passed...intellectual
light before you. It is most probable you thought
to yourself that a new thought struck you, which is a common [reaction] by reflecting people to the new ideas which they receive from spirits. - Page 108
of THE HIDDEN PROPHET The Life of Dr. John Ballou Newbrough by Susan B. Martinez, PhD. - OAHSPE BOOK OF INSPIRATION
CHAPTER III: 9. Jehovih saith: ... 22. One man is
sensitive, as a plate for a picture, and he catcheth My Light instantly, and knoweth it is from Me. 23.
Another one saith: A sudden thought struck me!
But he discerneth not whence it came.
Photographic plates preceded photographic film
as a capture medium in photography. The light-sensitive emulsion of silver salts was coated on a glass plate,
typically thinner than common window glass, instead of a clear plastic film.
Facial recognition (below) is an important and rapidly evolving biometric science.
Walter Russell (born May, 1871) received his greatest inspiration and enlightenment (time of light) at age 50 (May, 1921).
May, 1921 Walter Russell experiences
a 39 day and night period of illumination, writing
down some 40,000 words given to him from the Light of Cosmic
TABLE OF EVOLUTION
Cosmic Consciousness. DNA Awareness.
- DNA Fusion [joining two or more things together to form a single entity] ESP Precognition Hedonic
Passivity The Adolescent The Learning Child The Toddler The Newborn
joining two or more things together =
joining two alleles to form a single genotype = (C;C)
2) Brain regions involved with mystic experiences.
...are the amygdala and hippocampus. The
hippocampus on the right is a cognitive structure that processes
non-verbal information. It's also involved in spatial perception, music appreciation, as well as memory creation and consolidation
. It's a major source of dream imagery. A mystic whose experiences
appear from an unusually responsive right hippocampus is expected to report experiences dominated by right hippocampal (RH) phenomena. The RH role in spatial reasoning and memory
implicates it in experiences of 'infinity', the "infinite
void", spaciousness, and the experience that the space occupied by the sense of self is limitless ("one with
The RH role in non-verbal information implicates it in the experience of inner silence, or freedom
from 'mind chatter'. Its cognitive functions implicate it in the experience of 'knowingness', and 'insight', in which understandings
appear spontaneously. Its role in creating and retrieving memories suggests
it may be crucial in accessing inner images, including symbolic, spiritual, and artistic images. Its production of theta activity suggests it's crucial in trance and meditation.
Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Chapter
8: 2. Ethe, being the time of light, is named
dan. Oahspe Book of Knowledge Part IV: 6....dans varied from fifty (50) to six hundred
(600) years. the time of light = dan = fifty (50) years.
1921 was a sharp increase up-spike in vortexian energy (heat), time of dan.
the start of the current Kosmon cycle (1848) to year of Walter
Russell's greatest time of light (1921) = 63 years.
63 / 3.7 (4th rule of prophecy) = 17.02, a harmonic multiple of the 2nd rule of prophecy (11.1) divided by 3. Pages 4 and 8 of THE UNIFIED CYCLE THEORY (How Cycles Dominate the Structure of the Universe and Influence Life on Earth)
by Stephen J. Puetz, 2009 says "Cycles exhibit harmonics
of three. Take the period of cycles, multiply
by three, and the next larger cycle results [33 x 3 = 99-100]. Conversely, take cycle...divide it's frequency by three, and the next smaller cycle appears [33 / 3
= 11]. Rules of prophecy in Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter III:14. Cycles are in harmonics of 3.
3rd rule of prophecy (99.9 years) divided b 3 = first rule of
prophecy (33.3 years) divided by 3 = 11.1 years (2nd rule of prophecy). 2nd rule of prophecy (11.1) divided by 3 = 3.7 years
= the 4th rule of prophecy = the average cycle of warm up-spikes (see near the bottom of Misc. 3, Sacred mathematics, geometry,
music, harmonics, cosmology, cycles chapter/page of this website). Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy:
Chapter IX: 2. These fall under the divisor, or multiple, 3 ...
Genero-activity = vortex'ya = inner explosive speed of light 186,240 miles
per second = E=mc2 = Carbon
THE SECRET OF
LIGHT 1947 BY Walter Russell page 266:
Genero-activity = winding up process = opposite of
Vortex'ya = tightends the winding of Carbon into such a dense substance = Diamond
= heat = highest percentage of charge.
Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy chapter 1:37
Corporeal substances all contain heat (vortexya
proper)...but the diamond containeth the highest percentage of charge.
Diamond is the hardest substance found in nature, Diamond is four times harder than the next hardest natural mineral,
Graphite and diamond are two of the most interesting minerals. They are identical chemically—both are composed
of carbon (C), but physically, they are very different. Minerals which have the same chemistry but different crystal structures
are called polymorphs.
The reason for the differences in hardness and other physical properties
can be explained with the molecular models below.
In a diamond, the carbon atoms are arranged
tetrahedrally. Each carbon atom is attached to four other carbon atoms 1.544 x 10-10 meter away with a C-C-C bond angle of
109.5 degrees. It is a strong, rigid three-dimensional structure that results in an infinite network of atoms. This accounts
for diamond's hardness, extraordinary strength and durability and gives diamond a higher density than graphite (3.514 grams
per cubic centimeter). Because of its tetrahedral structure, diamond also shows a great resistance to compression. The hardness
of a crystal is measured on a scale, devised by Friederich Mohs, which ranks compounds according to their ability to scratch
one another. Diamond will scratch all other materials and is the hardest material known (designated as 10 on the Mohs scale).
It is the best conductor of heat that we know, conducting up to five times the amount that copper does.
The tetrahedron is one kind of pyramid, which is a polyhedron
with a flat polygon base and triangular faces connecting the base to a common point. In the case of a tetrahedron the base
is a triangle (any of the four faces can be considered the base), so a tetrahedron is also known as a "triangular pyramid".
density or density of a material is its mass per unit volume. The symbol most often used for density is ρ (the lower case
Greek letter rho). Mathematically, density is defined as mass divided by volume:
p = m/v
where ρ is the density, m is the mass, and V is the volume. The density at all points of a homogeneous object equals its
total mass divided by its total volume.
In general, density can be changed by changing either
the pressure or the temperature. Increasing the pressure always increases the density of a material. Increasing the temperature
generally decreases the density...
OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY IX:1 says "The same force,
vortexya, pervadeth the entire universe but different, according to volume, velocity and CONFIGURATION."
Force of Vortexya = Configuration = tetrahedral pyramid structure = fig. 52 Atomic systems forming, Fig. 53 AA Atomic
systems forming. = Vortices of contracting cones. Below Fig. 52 and Fig. 53 of THE SECRET OF LIGHT (PAGE 249). Fig. 66 Below.
Above Mystery of Gravitation and Radiation
= Charge and Discharge = Positive and Negative Vortexya of THE SECRET OF LIGHT by Walter Russell. Plate
46. - DISSECTION OF THE GREAT SERPENT (SOLAR SYSTEM) of Oahspe. showing Solar Vortex and Gravitation and Radiation spiral
forces. Plate 47. - THE CYCLIC COIL of Oahspe showing side view of Plate 46. above.
Above diamond cubic crystal structure
is a repeating pattern of 8 atoms that certain materials may adopt as they solidify. While the first known example was diamond, other elements in group 14 also adopt this structure. - Page 225 of THE SECRET OF LIGHT by Walter Russell "...sphere
of multiplied [2x2x2=8] matter [gaseous] and the space [cube] of divided [8/4=2] matter. - Page 226 of THE SECRET OF LIGHT by Walter Russell "Multiplication [2x2x2=8] and division [8/4=2] of expressed energy
[E=] into high and low potential of gravitation [compression]
and radiation [expansion] is made possible by
the plan of Nature... Gravitation [m=E/c2]...spirally inward...to
wind [compress] light waves [c2] into solids [m] to center space [vortex center]. Radiation [E=mc2] thrusts
spirally outward to unwind [expand] dense solids [m] into space to surround solids.
<---Notice at center of sphere is
a compressed cube.
Above music sound --------------------and------------------nuclear explosion = radiation expanding
Page 269 0f THE SECRET OF LIGHT by Walter Russell...Density = high heat = high charge = high melting
Page 270 of THE SECRET OF LIGHT by Walter Russell...negative Vortexya [Oahspe] =
Radioactivity = reaches speed of light = subatomic and atomic vortexian velocity = C = speed of light = E=mc2
Page 275 of THE SECRET OF LIGHT by Walter Russell - Atomic Structure = elements of matter = are not different substances,
or different things. They are DIFFERENT PRESSURE conditions of light waves = Vortexya [Oahspe] = electric pressures exerted
upon them during INWARD OR OUTWARD SPIRAL JOURNEY.
Page 276 of THE SECRET OF LIGHT by Walter
Russell...Spiral Journey = spiral motion = contracts into greater pressures
Page 277 of THE SECRET
OF LIGHT by Walter Russell...MULTIPLYING [X] and DIVIDING [/] PRESSURES determine the DENSITY and VOLUME of each ELEMENT.
The COLOR SPECTRUM RECORDS [records of vortexian currents] these PRESSURES, as the COMPLETE HISTORY of EVERY ELEMENT [spectral
analysis, mass spectrometer, spectrograph].
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter IX: 2. As
previously shown, colors are not substances or things in fact, but records of currents of vortexya, and are
in proportion to their deviation from linear to adverse parallelism. These fall under the divisor, or multiple,
3 (primaries), yellow, blue and red, corresponding to the times, 11, 33, 99, and so on.
Beast color = Purple or Violet = 66 (between blue 33 and red 99), Yellow is 11, the White light (whole spectrum) = 100 or
1000 = Ethe
THE MESSAGE OF THE DIVINE ILLIAD VOL. 1 page 238...Compression and expansion
are represented by matter and space, by the earth and the heavens; by positive and negative, by the male father principle
and the female mother principle.
THE MESSAGE OF THE DIVINE ILLIAD VOL. 1 page 245: Question:
Wouldn't a person progress faster spiritually if he could leave his dialy round of chores and lead a more solitary life for
at least a little while--in the mountains or woods [forest], or by the seashore? Answer (from Walter Russell): Yes! If
it is possible, one should do that; and one can also learn to lead a solitary life in the midst of even boiler factories and
OAHSPE: Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Chapter X: 3. These creatures prophesy by
the direct action of vortexian currents upon them. They feel what is approaching, BECAUSE THE UNSEEN CAUSE IS ALREADY UPON
THEM. 4. Man can learn to acquire the same kind of prophecy. And this is different from the prophecy herein before mentioned,
because he prophesieth in this last method without rules or calculations. 5. To attain this kind of prophecy, the following
discipline is requisite: 6. To live in the fields and forests [alone in the wilderness], and study the action of unseen
forces upon himself [introspection]; to eat not fish, nor flesh, nor any food that cometh of animals; to bathe daily; to permit
no passion to enter his mind; to abnegate self and to wed himself to the Creator for righteousness sake, and to do good; to
discipline his mind, to remain in any given direction on any subject, for days if necessary; to become oblivious to pain.
After which he shall receive anointment [anointed] from one who had previously attained the seership.
THE MESSAGE OF THE DIVINE ILLIAD VOL. 1 page 249: Planets are born from the sun by the way of rings sent out
from the sun's equator--great nebulous rings which wind up upon themselves to become planets of the sun, just as the rings
of Saturn will wind themselves up into moons. All of the moons of Saturn were rings. All of the moons of any satellite were
first equatorial rings; then they become moons of the planet from which they were born.
Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy: Chapter IV: 14. In the early age of the vortex of the earth, so swiftly flew the outer
rim that border eddies ensued, from which nebula congregated, until the earth had a nebulous belt around it. This belt,
in time, losing pace with the earth's vortex, condensed and made the moon. - PLANETS ARE BORN, GROW TO MATURITY THROUGH GENERATIVE PREPONDERANCE, THEN FADE AND "DIE" THROUGH RADIATIVE PREPONDERANCE. ALL FORM APPEARS AND DISAPPEARS BY THE SAME PROCESS. - Page 223 of _THE UNIVERSAL ONE_
1926 by Walter Russell. OAHSPE: Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy CHAPTER V: 14. Wherefrom this rule will now be plain
to the student: When a planet hath attained to so great age she no
longer giveth forth light or heat to radiate upon herself, she can not be seen in the heavens. Of which kinds of planets
there are millions in the etherean firmament. Some of these move slower than any of the planets man can see. Some of these
at times eclipse the sun, and are taken for sun-spots, although, perhaps, not a million miles from the earth. 15. Like
unto these, in darkness, are there plateaux of nebula floating in the firmament, which also produce eclipses of the sun and
of the moon. For convenience, let such planets and nebula be called
dead planets and dead nebula. - THE MESSAGE OF THE DIVINE ILLIAD VOL II page 201-202: To charge means to compress, or condense, into higher pressure. It means to accumulate a large volume ito a small volume,
like compressing a gas into a solid. Conversely, to discharge means to radiate a solid back into a liquid or gas.
THE MESSAGE OF THE DIVINE ILLIAD VOL II page 229: Q....compression of atoms in relation to their wave frequencies. A. The more you contract atoms together [higher mass], the shorter the distance between each wave [shorter wavelength] and
the higher their troughs and crests. That means more waves per inch--which means more activity [higher frequency]. That means
more power to express energy.
sodium Na = Yellow intense = Atomic Mass 22.989768 = 508–526 THz(Frequency), 570–590 nm(Wavelength)
Boron B = Green (Bright, somewhat yellowish) = Atomic Mass 10.81 = 526–606 THz(Frequency), 495–570 nm(Wavelength)
molybdenum Mo = Green (Yellowish) = Atomic Mass 95.94 = 526–606 THz(Frequency), 495–570
thallium Tl = Green (Pure) = Atomic Mass 204.3833 = 526–606 THz(Frequency),
Indium In = Blue (prominent blue) = Atomic Mass 114.82 = 606–668
THz(Frequency), 450–495 nm(Wavelength)
cesium Cs = Violet Pale (masked by the more prominent
yellow) = Atomic Mass 132.9054 = 668–789 THz(Frequency), 380–450 nm(Wavelength)
Higher the Compression = Higher atomic mass = higher frequency = shorter wavelength = more power
= more energy = more vortexya Mass = Frequency = Energy = Vortexya = M = F = E = V
increases charge, energy and mass, shortens wavelengths, and increases frequency and vibrations per second,
Compression shortens the distance which shortens the wavelengths and increases the frequency (bounce back waves,
echos, vibrations) Expansion increases the distance which lengthens the wavelengths and decreases the frequency of waves
Because each element has an exactly defined line emission spectrum, scientists are
able to identify them by the color of flame they produce. For example, copper produces a blue flame, lithium and strontium
a red flame, calcium an orange flame, sodium a yellow flame, and barium a green flame. http://www.webexhibits.org/causesofcolor/3BA.html copper (atomic mass 63.5) produces a blue flame lithium (Atomic mass: 6.941) and strontium
(Atomic mass: 87.62) a red flame calcium (Atomic mass: 40.078) an orange flame sodium (Atomic mass: 22.989769)
a yellow flame barium (Atomic mass: 137.327) a green flame - Higher the Compression = Higher atomic mass =
higher frequency = shorter wavelength = more power = more energy = more vortexya Mass = Frequency = Energy = Vortexya
= M = F = E = V - Color(Wavelength nm),(Frequency THz) red 780 − 622, 384 − 482 orange 622
− 597, 482 − 503 yellow 597 − 577, 503 − 520 green 577 − 492 520 −
610 blue 492 − 455, 610 − 659 violet 455 − 390, 659 − 769 666 THz = Violet = color
of the Beast Thz = terahertz (THz) = vibrational frequency White light is a mixture of the colors of the visible
spectra. http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-wavelength.htm Google terahertz = one trillion periods per second. http://wordnetweb.princeton.edu/perl/webwn
- Higher atomic mass = higher frequency cesium (Atomic Mass 132.9054) a violet flame
= 659 − 769 THz Indium (Atomic Mass 114.82) a blue flame = 610 − 659 THz molybdenum (Atomic Mass 95.94)
a green flame = 520 − 610 THz calcium (Atomic mass: 40.078) an orange flame = 482 − 503 THz lithium
(Atomic mass: 6.941) a red flame = 384 − 482 THz Higher the Compression = shorter wavelength
Emission Spectra vs. Flame Test? What are some difficulties that may be encountered in the use of the flame
test for identification compared to using emission spectra? If you have a spectrum of sufficiently high resolution, you
should be able to clearly identify the individual atomic emission lines even if there are large concentrations of other substances;
in a flame test, where you rely on a visual impression of color, this is not always possible. As the eye is not a spectrometer,
we cannot distinguish between spectra that are in reality very different but add up to an overall similar color impression
( for example, you can assign a blue flame color to copper(I) or arsenic - same flame color, different spectra). Also, even
small traces of sodium will simply color the flame a bright orange that outshines any other typical emissions. Additionally,
as color is something perceived individually, different experimenters may well assign one flame color to different elements. http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20111027125243AADYD6B
Spectroscopy is the study of the interaction between matter and radiated
energy. Historically, spectroscopy originated through the study of visible light dispersed according to its
wavelength, e.g., by a prism. Later the concept was expanded greatly to comprise any interaction with radiative energy
as a function of its wavelength or frequency. Spectroscopic data is often represented by a spectrum,
a plot of the response of interest as a function of wavelength or frequency. Analysis of white light by dispersing it
with a prism is an example of spectroscopy. Spectroscopy and spectrography are terms used to refer to
the measurement of radiation intensity as a function of wavelength and are often used to describe experimental spectroscopic
methods. Spectral measurement devices are referred to as spectrometers, spectrophotometers, spectrographs or spectral
analyzers. Daily observations of color can be related to spectroscopy. Neon lighting is a direct application
of atomic spectroscopy. Neon and other noble gases have characteristic emission colors, and neon lamps use
electricity to excite these emissions. Inks, dyes and paints include chemical compounds selected for their spectral characteristics
in order to generate specific colors and hues. A commonly encountered molecular spectrum is that of nitrogen dioxide. Gaseous
nitrogen dioxide has a characteristic red absorption feature, and this gives air polluted with nitrogen dioxide a reddish
brown color. Rayleigh scattering is a spectroscopic scattering phenomenon that accounts for the color of the sky. Spectroscopic
studies were central to the development of quantum mechanics and included Max Planck's explanation of blackbody radiation,
Albert Einstein's explanation of the photoelectric effect and Niels Bohr's explanation of atomic structure and spectra. Spectroscopy
is used in physical and analytical chemistry because atoms and molecules have unique spectra.These spectra
can be interpreted to derive information about the atoms and molecules, and they can also be used to detect, identify and
quantify chemicals. Spectroscopy is also used in astronomy and remote sensing. Most research telescopes have spectrographs.
The measured spectra are used to determine the chemical composition and physical properties of astronomical
objects (such as their temperature and velocity). The energy (E) of a photon is related to its frequency (v)
by E = hv where h is Planck's constant, and so a spectrum of the system response vs. photon frequency will peak at
the resonant frequency or energy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectroscopy
Pages 202-203 of Universal Cycle Theory (2011), Figure 9.4.A (Bulk Denisty Cycles in the Periodic Table) shows the
bulk density of atoms from 1 to 100 in the Periodic Table. [Barbalance, 2010] In the figure, the vertical lines mark
the nobel gases. Note that the noble gas densities are slightly
above zero, even though they appear as zero in
the figure. Notice how bulk densities decrease
[down-spike cycle] as the atomic numbers approach that of the next noble gas, and then immediatly increase [up-spike cycle] for the element after the noble gas. - Pages 271-272 of The Secret of Light (1947) by Walter
Russell, "THE INERT GASES ...Elements
are not fixed created things. They are pressure conditions
of light waves...The inert gases are cosmic elements which will not combine with any other elements.
They constitute the recording system of this creating universe...They represent
minimum motion in the wave, just as amplitude represent maximum motion. Elements are waves ...The cosmic inert gases fill all space between the stars of heaven. They insulate states of motion from each other by their balancing zero....The list of cosmic gases
follows: helium, neon, argon, krypton, zernon, etc.." Each cosmic gas mentioned by Walter Russell in 1947 is a
noble gas that is at the end-beginiing of each bulk density cycle of the Periodic Table of Chemical Elements,
their bulk densities approach zero, or as Walter Russell said "They insulate states of motion from each other by their
balancing zero." The noble gases insulate, separate or
divide the different orders of chemical elements by their near zero bulk densities. - Noble Gases - at ChemicalElements.com These elements were considered to be inert gases until the 1960's, because their
oxidation number of 0 prevents the noble gases
from forming compounds readily. All noble gases have the maximum number of electrons possible in their outer shell (2 for
Helium, 8 for all others), making them stable. Helium Neon Argon Krypton Xenon Radon http://www.chemicalelements.com/groups/noblegases.html - Comparison of Periodic Table of the Chemical Elements
(studyofoahspe.com 2013) divided into octaves and electromagnetic waves with: Bulk density of atoms in the Periodic Table (Universal Cycle Theory, 2011) ordered by atomic
numbers: 1st Octave = mean atomic number of 1-2 1st Bulk density = mean atomic number 1-2 - 2nd Octave = mean atomic number of 7-8 2nd Bulk density = mean atomic number of 7-8 - 3rd Octave = mean
atomic number of 17-18 3rd Bulk density = mean atomic number of 14-15 - 4th Octave = mean atomic number of
27-28 4th Blulk density = mean atomic number of 27-28 - 5th Octave = mean atomic number of 38-39 5th
Bulk density = mean atomic number of 44-45 - New
Periodic Table of the Chemical Elements ordered by Bulk density cycles of atomic numbers (2014): 1st Order = Atomic numbers 1-2 2nd Order = Atomic numbers 3-10 3rd Order = Atomic numbers 11-18 4th Order
= Atomic numbers 19-36 5th Order = Atomic numbers 37-54 6th Order = Atomic numbers 55-86 7th Order = Atomic
numbers 87-100+ = 7 completion of creation - Pi =
22/7, 22 = Circumference of circle, Creator, 7 = Diameter, Creation (chemical elements). Circumference = Vortex circular cycle, Diameter = linear compression-decompression wave cycle. - THE MESSAGE OF THE DIVINE ILLIAD VOL II page 229:
Q....compression of atoms in relation
to their wave frequencies. A. The more you contract atoms together[higher mass], the shorter the distance between each
wave[shorter wavelength] and the higher their troughs and crests. That means more waves per inch--which means more activity[higher
frequency]. That means more power to express energy.
Merriam-Websters Collegiate Dictionary
10th Edition: electromagnetic spectrum: the entire range of wavelengths or frequencies of electromagnetic radiation extending
from gamma rays to the longest radio waves and including visible light.
Gamma rays have the shortest
wavelength but the highest frequency = more compression = more energy = more power
Walter Russell the higher the frequency the more power to express energy. Gamma rays have the highest frequencies and should
also express more power and energy.
Gamma radiation, also known as gamma rays, and denoted
by the Greek letter γ, refers to electromagnetic radiation of high frequency and therefore high energy per photon. In astronomy, gamma rays are defined by their energy, and no production process need be specified. The energies of gamma
rays from astronomical sources range over 10 TeV, at a level far too large to result from radioactive decay. A notable example
is extremely powerful bursts of high-energy radiation normally referred to as long duration gamma-ray bursts, which produce
gamma rays by a mechanism not compatible with radioactive decay. These bursts of gamma rays, thought to be due to the collapse
of stars called hypernovas, are the most powerful events so far discovered in the cosmos. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray
Higher frequency = Higher energy = higher power = gamma rays have the highest frequency = gamma
ray bursts are the most powerful event in the cosmos gamma-ray bursts...are the most powerful events so far discovered
in the cosmos.
Gamma rays, X-rays, visible light, and radio waves are all forms of electromagnetic
radiation. The only difference is the frequency and hence the energy of those photons. Gamma rays are generally the most energetic
of these... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray
Higher frequency = Higher energy = Gamma rays have the highest frequency = Gamma rays have the most energy
The so-called long-duration gamma ray bursts produce events in which energies of ~ 1044 joules (as much
energy as our Sun will produce in its entire life-time) but over a period of only 20 to 40 seconds http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamma_ray
Gamma rays are ionizing radiation, and are thus biologically hazardous. They are classically produced
by the decay from high energy states of atomic nuclei (gamma decay), but are also created by other processes. Paul Villard,
a French chemist and physicist, discovered gamma radiation in 1900, while studying radiation emitted from radium. Villard's
radiation was named "gamma rays" by Ernest Rutherford in 1903. ...produced by the decay from high energy states
of atomic nuclei (gamma decay)...Gamma rays are emitted during radioactive decay processes such as those found in nuclear
explosions.[produced from atomic fission...the spliting or breaking of atomic particles produces radiation or energy.
Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy: Chapter IV: 17. Wherever the vortexian current falleth, corpor
is more or less damaged or dissolved, or changed in its combinations. On a piece of iron, fresh broken, it produceth
rust...the vortexian solution...The break of its needles liberateth vortexya, which result
is a minor representation of the discharge of an electric spark from the pole of a battery.
Here Oahspe in 1881 states that "The break of its needles liberateth vortexya" or the
spliting or breaking of atomic or subatomic particles liberates energy (atomic fission).
fission 2. A nuclear reaction in which an atomic nucleus, especially a heavy nucleus such
as an isotope of uranium, splits into fragments, usually two fragments of comparable mass, releasing from 100 million to several
hundred million electron volts of energy. fission 1. the act or process of splitting or breaking into parts http://www.thefreedictionary.com/fission
40. SHA'MAEL in Oahspe GOD'S BOOK OF BEN says. ...My etherean hosts shall have redeemed man from sin. Nor
shall the inhabitants of the earth marry, for the time of begetting will be at an end...the earth will have fullfilled its
labor...In the place where the earth was, shall some of My far-off worlds come and fulfill the labor allotted to them.
And the atmosphereans who have not been redeemed from darkness in that day, shall alight on the new world and also fulfill
THE MESSAGE OF THE DIVINE ILLIAD VOL I, by Walter Russell, page 241: Question:
What about after we have found completion in cosmic conscious awareness of unity with God?
Answer: When that time comes, the planet will be way out where Mars is--or beyond--and Venus will be rolling
up getting ready to play the man-idea all over again.
When all mankind has found the
Light, the play will be finished. Likewise this planet will be finished as an abode for man. It will then be rolled off into
its ever expanding orbit while Venus is gradually being rolled into place to become the stage for the next repetition of THE
ASCENT OF MAN in this solar system. - The Secret of Light by Walter Russell
THE SECRET OF LIGHT
by Walter Russell, page 161: IS LIGHT A WAVE [etheic wave] OR CORPUSCLE [corpor]? Much contorversy has arisen as
to whether light is corposcular, as Newton claimed it to be , or waves. There is much evidence in favor of both theories.
It is both. Light is expressed by motion [etheic solution in rotary motion]. All motion is wave motion
[vortexian]. All waves are expressed by fields of equal and opposite pressures of two-way motion [positive and negative vortex'ya].
I first started reading the teachings of
Walter Russell (The Message of The Divine Iliad Volumes 1 and 2) back in 1979 when I was 16 years old, 3 years before I started reading Oahspe. When I was in
boot camp in 1984 there was two books I was allowed to keep that I had brought with me, the Bible, and The
Message of The Divine Iliad by Walter Russell (my Oahspe was too large a book, and I had Oahspe sent to me after I graduated
boot camp and went to my next station and training center).
...as in the magnetic poles or the center
of gravity of the earth — or the sun ...It is the vortex of electric whirlpools which we call cyclones. It
centers the positive and negative parts of a wave as the wave fulcrum. Matter is wound up into dense spheres and unwound into
space surrounding those spheres. - Walter Russell
-- "The positive electric condition compresses large volumes of light-waves into small volumes by winding them up centripetally into spiral vortices
by thrusting inward from without. That is what gravitation is." - A New Concept of the Universe by Walter
Russell. The light-waves are made of polarized sub-atomic
needles of corpor (just as magnetic materials are made of microscopic polarized domains).
Einstein got wrong was his view of gravity, that
gravity was caused by the mass of a planet or star, which is OPPOSITE of what Oahspe says (the mass of a planet
or star is caused by the vortex), Einstein's gravitational field was the area of influence around a planet or star that
was caused by the mass of the object to warp space-time (like a heavy ball sitting on a foam mattress, causing the foam to
bend and warp and causing anything near it to fall towards the heavy ball). http://www.earthvortex.com/wpimages/wpa845493c_06.jpg
You can emulate this by placing a heavy object, like a bowling ball,
on your mattress and observe the depression it makes. This effect is a "curvature" of the fabric (mattress)
due to the mass (bowling ball). As you might imagine, the heavier the object you use, the more significant this curvature
will be. Similarly, any object with mass will have a similar effect on the invisible space around it. Einstein's
visualizes gravitation The idea above is exactly what Einstein was thinking when he tried to imagine why things move
they way they do. http://www.einsteinsworld.com/truth-about-gravity.htm
Einstein eventually identified the property of spacetime which is responsible
for gravity as its curvature...pushed and pulled, stretched and warped by matter. Einstein's theory of general relativity,
which is often summed up in words as follows: "matter tells spacetime how to curve, and curved spacetime tells matter
how to move". https://einstein.stanford.edu/SPACETIME/spacetime2.html Einstein got it wrong, that matter is the cause of gravity.
physics experiments also show that gravity is not curved space. If space was curved in a gravitational field, then projectiles
moving through a gravitational field would all follow the same path regardless of velocity, but as the experiments show,
the faster the object is traveling, the straighter its path. Eric Baird's aether density gradient theory seems to be a good
alternative to the curved space theory of general relativity. By Alvin D. Heindel on July 3, 2009 http://www.amazon.com/Challenging-Modern-Physics-Questioning-Relativity/dp/1581124376
It says: "The ether, if it
exists, cannot be detected" - Albert Einstein.
Einstein based that assumption on the null
result of the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1887. But what is missing from the website is the Sagnac experiment which did
detect the ether in 1913, but Einstein ignored the results of the Sagnac experiment.
- Einstein and the Ether http://www.amazon.com/Einstein-Ether-Ludwik-Kostro/dp/0968368948 Although Einstein is widely credited with abolishing
the ether concept, he actually introduced a new relativistic ether in 1916, developing the idea in his later
works. This book relates the story of Einstein and the rebirth of the ether, demonstrating how Einstein came to reject the 19th century ether. It details three relativistic
ether models developed by Einstein and Einstein's treatment of spacetime as a material entity-a "new ether".
- Einstein's views on the aether Therefore, as historians such as John Stachel argue, Einstein's views on the
"new aether" are not in conflict with his abandonment of the aether in 1905. For, as Einstein himself pointed out, no "substance" and no state of motion can be attributed
to that new aether. [B 11][B 12][B 13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luminiferous_aether
himself pointed out, no "substance" and no state of motion can be attributed
to that new aether, this is OPPOSITE of what Oahspe said: Oahspe BOOK OF JEHOVIH CHAPTER II: 5. For the substance of My etherean worlds
I created Ethe [ether], the MOST RARIFIED.
Out of ethe made I them. Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Chapter 8: 1. To ethe [ether] give motion one hundred, or ninety-nine (as the case may be); to corpor give zero, that is, no motion
-- A anti-Oahspe person said: "Michelson
Morley proved without a shadow of a doubt, THERE IS NO AETHER TO MEASURE. Furthermore, in Einstein's special theory of Relativity, it was proven that light was a constant.
SORRY VORTEX BOY, but all of that shit has been discarded hundreds
and hundreds of years ago." Read the information below that refutes what the Anti-Oahspe person said.
In Builder's "Ether and Relativity" he summarizes his view
as follows :
"The relative retardation
of clocks, predicted by the restricted theory of relativity, demands our recognition of the causal significance of absolute
velocities. This demand is also implied by the relativistic equations of electrodynamics and even by the formulation of the
restricted theory itself. The observable effects of absolute accelerations and of absolute velocities must be ascribed to
interaction of bodies and physical systems with some absolute inertial system. We have no alternative but to identify this
absolute system with the universe. Thus in the context of physics, absolute motion must be understood to mean motion relative
to the universe, and any wider or more abstract interpretation of the "absolute" must be denied. Interactions
of bodies and physical systems with the universe cannot be described in terms of Mach's hypothesis, since this is untenable.
There is therefore no alternative to the ether hypothesis. "
Builder’s conclusion that there must be "an absolute
inertial system" re-introduces the preferred frame of Lorentz back into relativity, the very thing that Einstein sought
If we are to accept Builder's hypothesis of a universal preferred frame for motion (ether),
then we are compelled to accept the other critical tenet of Lorentz over Einstein, that it is the speed of light, and not
time, which is the fundamental variable in our universe. In accepting a notion of absolute motion, or a preferred frame,
we are as Dingle says, rejecting the notion of "relative motion". Despite Einstein borrowing heavily from Lorentz's
equations and theory, and the fact that both theories predict similar results for the same experiments, the two theories
are philosophically antithetical - and as such the conclusions about the nature of space and time result in entirely different
models of the universe.
Let’s look at the implications
of the Hafele and Keating Experiment on the relativity of time. Similar to our original case 3, we expand the travelling
clock experiment to the orbit of the earth. Rather than planes, we put cesium clocks on two rockets and have them take off
from the surface of the earth at equal escape velocities (say 12 km/s), but set to travel in opposite directions around
the sun before returning to the earth, as in the figure below. The rockets maintain the same velocity with respect to the
earth’s surface throughout their voyage. Both rockets arrive back on the earth at around the same time, and again
at the same velocity with respect to the earth, at 12 km/s.As expected, the rocket on the left going
counter-clockwise arrives with its clock rate slowed with respect to the earth clock, and the
rocket on the right travelling clockwise has had its clock rate sped up with respect to the earth
clock, even though their velocity with respect to the earth’s surface clock was the same. From the perspective of
the earth (assuming no foreknowledge that they arerotating),thepathlengthsforeachrocket
appear to be the same. However, an observer B on the sun would see that the rockets had to travel at different speeds
with respect to the sun in order to be travelling at the same speed with respect to the orbiting earth. The paths that they
travelled would also appear to be different lengths when viewed from the sun. Only the observer on the sun would agree that
the SR postulate that a clock decreases it rate with velocity is found to be (approximately) true. The earth observer A
sees this to be false – for him, the clocks have travelled identical paths at identical speeds, yet the clocks have
gone out of synchronization. This invalidates the notion that the ECI frame of the earth is a unique
frame of reference for rotation with which the laws of SR hold true.
Again, we can extrapolate this thought experiment to the edge of the galaxy, and further to the entire universe.For clocks rotating around an observer, the only unique perspective where ultimately any
rotational motion will always lead to a slowing of the clock rate is the stationary frame of the
universe. In any other velocity frame, it will always be possible to create orbiting clocks that appear to speed up in rate
with respect to our observer. This is the same conclusion as earlier for the speed of light, except now applied to time.
These rotation experiments
have implied that there is a an absolute space with which we can define a reference speed of light C, and a preferred frame
of reference for a time clock for which all other moving clocks will count at a slower rate.
Since Einstein invented the idea of a variable time in order to explain the constancy of
the speed of light, should it not follow then that if we have shown that the speed of light is not always constant for moving
observers, then perhaps instead it is “time” that is constant, and the velocity of light is variable depending
on our motion with respect to absolute space? Since translational experiments always show a constant measured speed
of light, unlike the Sagnac experiment, perhaps apparent time dilation is our only indirect evidence that the speed of light
is changed in a hidden way during translational motion. In order to prove this we would need to design a clock that doesn’t
depend on the speed of light in its counting principle, and see if this clock is unaffected by time dilation.
As we said earlier, in order to prove that time dilation is an illusion,we would need to design
a clock that does not depend on the speed of light in its counting principle, and see if this clock is unaffected by time
dilation. Again, we turn to essential feature of the Sagnac effect, rotation, to design such a clock. This concept was first
proposed in our article “The Paradox of the Clocks in the Canaries” in 2010.
The simplest time dilation effect to test is gravitational time
dilation, the speeding up of clocks with altitude. According to Einstein, the rate of time follows the gravitational potential,
so a clock on the surface of the earth should count more slowly than a clock at some high altitude, such as at the top of
a mountain. Time is alleged to be moving into the future faster at the top of a mountain.So we need a clock on the Earth that is unaffected by altitude. Let's
say we use the rotation of the earth as our clock instead of a conventional cesium clock. After all, our human concept of
time, and the units that compose it (days, hours, minutes, seconds) are already derived from the rotation period of the earth,
so it should be the ideal clock for comparison. For each observer, we could use as our reference the position of the sun
in the sky, or the position of a Foucault pendulum, or most preferably the position of the fixed stars in sidereal time.
If we measure the sidereal day (23.93447 hours) as the time for one earth rotation relative to the vernal equinox, using
a sighting star as a reference, we can then place an observer A at the top of a mountain, and another observer B at sea level.
Preferably the mountain observer is exactly vertical over the sea level observer, and this vertical line passes through
the center of the earth, as shown in the picture below. We use as our example the mountain Pico del Teide on Tenerife, with
an altitude of 3718 meters. We give each observer A and B a cesium clock, and a sidereal clock. The sidereal
clocks mark a tick when the reference star is directly overhead each day. The cesium clocks mark a tick when 23.93477 hours
has passed in their local time. We then compare the four clocks to determine if they are counting at the same rate.
What happens is that when the reference star passes over
the red vertical line passing through observer A and B, both sidereal clocks have no choice but to trigger at the same moment,
differing only in the light propagation time between A and B. Because this propagation time is a fixed amount, it does not
affect the rate at which the two clocks count – therefore the count rate is exactly the same. However, since
both cesium clocks experience gravitational time dilation, the cesium clock at observer A must count faster than the cesium
clock at observer B. If we had pre-synchronized the two clocks at sea level, then the cesium clock at observer A will begin
to go out of synchronization with
three clocks, and the amount of time gained by cesium clock A will continue to increase as the days pass. Clearly three
of the 4 clocks agree on the amount of elapsed time – only cesium clock A reads in error. The fact that we have created
clocks immune to time dilation implies that real time has never changed at the top of the mountain – apparent
time dilation is an artifact of the difference in the speed of light at two difference points in space, and the use of clocks
calibrated to the speed of light – i.e. the light clocks of Einstein.
This conclusion is also consistent with
our reason – given the millions of years that the mountain has been around, the summit of Pico del Teide should by
now be several minutes in the future compared to the land at its sea shore base. And yet they are physically connected.
To believe that time dilation is real would require us to assume that walking up the mountain is the same as walking into
the future - the land would have to form a bridge between two points in Einstein’s dimension of time.It
is somewhat trivial to travel to the top of the mountain and view through a telescope a clock tower in Puerto de la Cruz
far below to verify that the top of the mountain and the sea side resort share the same present.
The author at the summit of Pico del Teide in 2012, checking the time. Puerto de la Cruz is clearly visible 3718 meters
below. Still in the present…
It is often argued that the predictions of Special and General Relativity
have been continuously verified and that therefore the theory is unquestionable. However, other theories, such as Lorentz
ether theories modified to take into account gravitational effects, can also make similar claims. There are in fact multiple
mathematical routes by which a correct prediction can be arrived at, but these theories may imply very different interpretations
of what our physical reality is. And this is at the heart of what is wrong with the theory of relativity – it may
make successful predictions based on math, but implies a nature of time and space which are not only inconsistent with logic
andreason, but are even contradictory. Our interpretation is that these problems arise because of the
switch from the absolute time / variable speed of light of Lorentz (1904)  to relative time / absolute speed of light
of Einstein (1905) – two stances which are only slightly different mathematically. In Lorentz’s favour, the
Sagnac effect demonstrates that depending on the placement of the observer, it is possible to see this variable speed of
light and to confound apparent time dilation. Our analysis of Einstein’s light clock has shown that it will always
count in error if the speed of light is not C in the moving frame. And further, our thought experiment with sidereal clocks
has shown that the entire premise that time dilation corresponds to a change in “real” time is highly questionable.
So when countered with the argument that General Relativity can explain the Sagnac effect, we might ask, why bother? If time
dilation is an illusion, then the entire 4D time-space continuum of Einstein should be considered, to use his own word for
the aether, “superfluous.”
The editor of the American
Journal of Physics said that articles critical of relativity could not be published "given the current situation in
physics in the late 1970s". ..the American Journal of Physics had "an editorial policy which explicitly forbade
any criticism of special relativity within its pages". This policy continues to the present day, ...Page 171 of Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories (2005) by Al
- Essen, the inventor of the atomic caesium clock, wrote several
articles critical of SR. The renowned Essen was warned by his employers that “to persist in his criticism of relativity
may affect his career and hence pension prospects, and he was told to use his private address on all correspondence
on the subject of relativity”. - Page 170 of Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories
(2005) By Al Kelly. -
To even begin to criticize Einstein's theory of special
relativity has become a scientific heresy of the highest order. The prevailing attitude of the physical establishment is that
anyone who doubts the validity of this "bedrock of modern physics" is insane, and that trying to refute it is a
symptom of "psychosis".
- "Only a HIGHLY
delusional person would believe
that they have disproved relativity and quantum
mechanics. Period." - January, 2012 from a physicist reviewing The Universal Cycle Theory book by Sephen J. Puetz
and Glenn Borchardt, PH.D. on Amazon.
- Part 1: by David de Hilster Back in 1992, I met a physicist, Dr Ricardo Carezani of Argentina, who claimed to have shown Einstein's special theory of relativity to be wrong, corrected the problem, and wanted my
help to get this information out to the wider world. In the ensuing years, I have found out more about the dysfunctional state of modern physics and cosmology, where the physics establishment enforces
a dogma based on politics and its own emotional needs. As dealt with by Roger below, the media blocks most of the information about Einstein's being wrong. Thus,
in their state of ignorance, they reject such a documentary and do not give it a fair hearing. Part 2: by Roger J. Anderton I've had a long interest in physics and mathematics, and, like David de Hilster, I've noticed the "lie" with
Einstein. After long, hard study of modern physics inspired by Einstein and obtaining a degree from the Open University,
I was shocked to find that I had been lied to about both the physics and the history of the subject. Einstein's relativity
is supposed to be highly mathematical, and I felt that I needed to learn more maths before studying the subject, so I did
the maths and went through the physics education system. I
then looked back on what I had been taught by studying the relativity writings of Einstein and was horrified to find them
to be nonsense. Worse, I found that there were clever people who had already worked out long ago that Einstein
was talking nonsense but were being ignored. (I found them through the social group that David refers to.) Einstein in the popular imagination is a super-genius, and it just does not go down well
with the public to have their hero represented as anything else. So, the physics establishment holds up this false front of Einstein the genius. To maintain this false
front, it even constructs a false history, ignoring actual history as much as it can. I now recognise what a genius Tesla was, but he wasn't working from physics as it is now taught to
students but was working from an earlier physics uncorrupted
by Einstein. Many others have had a low opinion of Einstein, but they've often found that this damaged
their reputations when they encountered people who hero-worshipped
Einstein. Conclusions We have been really profoundly messed up by Einstein. There are many mistakes
in Einstein's works. It is no longer really clear what Einstein’s relativity is supposed to be any more, and we dissidents
have asked the Einstein believers to clarify this. See our communiqué, "An Open Letter to the Physics Community:
The Twin Paradox".20 Einstein's portrayal as a hero
has made it difficult for anyone to correct the mistakes in his relativity theories. Those who do try to correct
these mistakes risk being smeared by his hero-worshippers. http://www.einsteinconspiracy.co.uk/nexus.htm
- Now imagine yourself as the pilot of a jet aircraft with a horn and
a headlight in its nosecone. You are flying at 650 mph. If
you sound the horn, because sound travels at about 700 mph, the sound is only traveling 50 mph faster than you are.
Yet, according to relativity theory apologists, if you turned the headlight on, because c is supposed to be constant within any reference frame, the light beam would travel at c ahead of you,
not c minus 650 mph. This is patent, unmitigated nonsense. http://www.gsjournal.net/old/ntham/amesbury.pdf
Light generated on the earth and sent around
the globe travels faster westward than eastward relative to the surface of the earth. The
Michelson and Gale 1925 test and the Saburi et al. 1976 test, as well as the Global Positioning System (GPS) for clock
synchronisation, prove this. - page 117 of Challenging Modern Physics:
Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories (2005) by Al Kelly.
SR [special relativity] has
two requirements relating to the behaviour of light: (i) the speed of light is independent of the speed of
its source and (ii) the speed of light is always measured as a constant (c) by any observer travelling
at uniform speed with respect to the source of the light (see Einstein 1905 and 1922).. -
page 118 of Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity
Theories (2005) by Al Kelly.
Air molecules or wind have a very
small effect (1 c vs 1.0003 c) on the so called travel of light:
Heavy Flint Glass
Values of n come from the CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics Notice that the index
of refraction of air differs from the index of refraction of vacuum by a very small amount [1 c vs 1.0003 c].
Just as the vortex (ether) PUSHes things to the earth
(gravity), the vortex PUSHes (controls) the travel (speed) of light (independant of the motion of the earth and the
air) so that Light travels faster going one way around the earth and travels slower going the other way around the earth.
This is the same result of the Sagnac experiment where light is faster going in one direction around a rotating disk and
slower going the other direction around a rotating disk (even when factoring in and calculating the speed and direction of
rotation). This proves Einstein was wrong, that the speed of light is not constant (which special relativity is based on).
The effect of an ether would be to slow down or vary
the speed of light (the Sagnac effect).
around the Earth faster Westward than Eastward. Does not the Special Theory of Relativity claim that the speed of light is
a constant? The standard answer to this conundrum is that the Special Relativity applies solely to uniform straight line
motion. It is claimed that, no matter how big the circle, motion along its periphery cannot be said to approach straight
line motion. This is said to be so even if the best measuring instruments devised cannot pick up the divergence from straight
line motion over the portion of circumference being used.. In
his paper launching the theory in 1905, having applied his theory to straight line motion, Einstein then applied it to a
closed curve of any shape. This rather undermines the popular explanation! The circuit does not have to be
as large as the cross section of the Earth to detect this effect. A Frenchman, Sagnac, found in 1914 that light signals go
around a disc of 1 m diameter faster against the spin of the disc than in the direction of the spin. We must then take
it that the Special Theory of Relativity is not correct and that Time and Space are absolute, not relative. The speed of
light is no longer sacrosanct. But, what about the many many experiments that fit Relativity theory? A thousand things may
fit a theory but, if one fact does not, the theory fails. In the words of Huxley "the great tragedy of science - the
slaying of a beautiful hypothesis by an ugly fact". By: Dr. Alf Kelly, Engineer http://www.engology.com/articlerelativity.htm
Dufour & Prunier Tests
The French pair, Dufour & Prunier (D & P)  repeated
the Sagnac test, forty years after Sagnac had done it, and got the same result. They then did other very important variations
on the original Sagnac experiments. They showed that the photographic record could be taken upon the spinning disc or from
the fixed laboratory and that the result was the same.
This author has located no reference
by Einstein to the Sagnac tests, and that can be viewed as very strange because the tests were on the speed of light, which
is the basis and core of Special Relativity. Einstein visited Miller  in the USA in 1921 where tests on the speed of light
were in progress. Lorentz also visited the same site. Sagnac’s work was referenced by Silberstein  (1921) who worked
with Michelson & Gale  on their on 1925 tests (described below). Miller was a co-worker with Michelson. Silberstein
remarked “As a matter of fact, Einstein himself never entered into the details of this important problem of rotation”
and “In fine, the optical circuit experiment may easily become crucial and fatal for Einstein‟s theory.”
Turner  (1979) commented that neither the Sagnac tests nor the Michelson & Gale tests were ever mentioned by Einstein.
Series #2 - Tests Invalidating
Relativity ----------------------- Question - (2-A) Why should we
believe that Einstein's theory of relativity is wrong? A. - Because several experiments have shown very
clearly that the results are not compatible with Einstein's predictions of general relativity. One can also think
of other important reasons, (like the non-conservation of momentum and mass-energy in general relativity [Ref.]) but this has been discussed elsewhere (see Einstein's Theory of Relativity versus Classical Mechanics). ----------------------- Question - (2-B) Can you give an example of an
experiment giving results which are contrary to Einstein's predictions? A. - Yes. One of the most simple
and remarkable experiment showing that Nature is not compatible with Einstein's hypothesis is the one described by Sagnac
in 1914. (Ref. Sagnac M. G., J. de Phys., 1914, 4, 177-195). ----------------------- Question
- (2-C) Can you give a simple description of the Sagnac's Experiment?
A. - Yes. Here is a simple description. Let us assume that you have a source
of light (a laser) at a certain location on Earth (e.g. your home). You project that beam of light directly toward a satellite
in orbit around the Earth on which there is a reflecting mirror. After that first reflection, light reaches other mirrors
in space so that it can finally complete a full turn around the Earth and reach again the same spot on Earth where light
has been emitted. Using that apparatus, you can measure the time it takes
for light to make a complete turn around the Earth when light moves from West to East. Now, if you repeat the same experiment,
with the same mirrors, (or even do it simultaneously), using light moving from East to West, you find that the time taken
by light to move from East to West is shorter than the time taken for light to complete the revolution in the opposite direction.
That difference of time is observed with the same apparatus, making simultaneous measurements, at the same location. One
can show that this difference is due to the Classical Newtonian motion of Earth rotation. That difference of time for light
taken between each direction depends directly on the velocity of the Earth moving around itself.
Einstein's Theory claims that there is no possible way to detect the ABSOLUTE velocity of the Earth. The very use of the
expression RELATIVITY comes from Einstein's hypothesis that parameters, like VELOCITY, are relative so that any absolute
motion (like absolute velocity) is meaningless. However, we see above, that the velocity of Earth is responsible for the
change of time light takes to go around the Earth. From a fixed location on Earth, we can detect the Earth's motion. Therefore,
contrary to Einstein principle of relativity, the velocity of light is not relative to the observer. One must conclude that
the Sagnac effect contradicts Einstein's hypothesis of General Relativity.
Let us note that in practice, the Sagnac effect is observed quite easily. In order to observe that effect, you do not have
to make a full circle around the Earth. If you make light rotate around a diameter of only one meter and many rotations,
(in either directions) you will observe the same effect. The slight change of time interval to travel in either directions
can be detected using interference patterns between the beams moving simultaneously in opposite directions. This method is
very sensitive to detect a very small rate of rotation. Such an observation is very important in ships (or spaceships) and
in airplanes. It is a kind of optical gyroscope (laser gyroscope) manufactured commercially in large number. This optical
gyroscope detects the absolute velocity of the rotating Earth from any location on Earth, even if Einstein's theory claims
that light travels with respect to the observer. There is also a Straight-Line-Component Sagnac effect. (see Einstein's Theory of Relativity versus Classical Mechanics, chapter 9). This will not be developed here. The Sagnac effect has been discussed in many papers. Recently, A. Kelly (The Sagnac
Effect and GPS Synchronization of Clock-Stations) presented a paper at the meeting of "Galileo Back in Italy",
Bologna May 1999. Ref. A. G. Kelly, HDS Energy Limited Celbridge, Co, Kildare, Ireland. The Sagnac effect on the GPS Clock
synchronization is extremely important. One can conclude that you can possess
now your own instrument that measures the ABSOLUTE velocity of rotation of the Earth, which is in striking contradiction
with Einstein's Theory of Relativity, while most of the scientists still refuse to accept that this can actually work. This
is the most striking proof that Einstein's Theory of General Relativity is wrong. ----------------------- Question
- (2-D) Since the Sagnac experiment was known in 1914 (even before the development of general
relativity), how can Einstein's general relativity be accepted so readily around 1919?
A. - For the same reason that in Galileo's time, when people refused to accept that it was not the Sun (nor the sky) which
is moving around the Earth. During Galileo's time, the interpretation of
the bible was that EVERYTHING in the sky was moving around the Earth. However, a contrary observation was already definitely
observed using Galileo's first telescope (when observing the satellites of Jupiter moving around Jupiter). It is reported
that the monks even refused to look through the Galileo's telescope. Modern physics is dogmatic and possesses many characteristics
of a religion. ----------------------- Question - (2-E) How accurate are the
measurements of the Sagnac effect? A. - The Sagnac experiment
has been measured a large number of times during the last century. In the case of an experiment of radio waves moving around
the Earth, Michelson and Gale (Ref. Michelson A. and Gale H. Astroph. J. 1925, 61, 137-145) made the first observation
that the electromagnetic signals around the world took a different time in the East and West directions in 1925. Very recently,
using a ring laser, Bilger H. R. et al. (IEEE Trans. 44, No:2, p. 468-470) confirmed that the Sagnac effect to better than
one part in 1020. http://www.newtonphysics.on.ca/faq/invalidation.html
-- The speed of light in vacuum, commonly denoted c, is a universal physical constant
important in many areas of physics. Its value is exactly 299792458 metres per second (≈3.00×108 m/s), as the
length of the metre is defined from this constant and the international standard for time. According to special relativity, c is the maximum speed at which all matter and information
in the universe can travel. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light - Consider what happens to light that is arriving
to us now from a galaxy at a distance from earth of, say, 7,000 million light-years. The blink of light
that emanated 7,000 million years ago would by now be a sphere with a radius of 7,000 million light-years. At what speed
is the surface of that sphere expanding? The expansion is related
to 2πrc, where r is 7,000 million light-years. However, the speed of expansion (and the light is expanding
to cover the whole surface of the sphere) is billions of billions
times the speed of light. The light itself is moving transversely at that
immense speed. It is supposed that no information can be transferred at a speed greater than c, yet here we have a practical
example of where information on a faraway galaxy is being transferred laterally at a far, far greater speed. - page 85 of Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories (2005) by Al Kelly -
Tesla said that "Einstein was completely wrong about General
Relativity!" ...The Polymath and Mystic
Walter Russell also said that 'General Relativity' was completely wrong!
- A] Does the Sagnac Experiment disprove Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity? The answer is YES. Unless it’s assumed
that STR does not apply to rotating frames of reference, the Postulate of Constancy is sufficiently falsified by the positive
outcome of the Sagnac Experiment. There is not doubt about that. Is it wise on the part of the Physics Establishment to
hold STR as valid in spite of all this? Probably…yes. The Sagnac effect is so minute. In order for them to discard
their STR, they need something big. Say a radio signal goes to Mars and comes back in less than half of its expected travel
time. A. Faraj, Jun. 14, 2005 http://www.gsjournal.net/old/comments/faraj.htm - The usual claim is that the Sagnac effect somehow falsifies the invariance of light speed with respect to all
inertial coordinate systems. Of course, it does no such thing, as is obvious from the fact that the simple description of
an arbitrary Sagnac device given above is based on isotropic
light speed with respect to one particular system of inertial coordinates, and all other inertial coordinate
systems are related to this one by Lorentz transformations, which are defined as the transformations that preserve light
speed. Hence no description of a Sagnac device in terms of any system of inertial coordinates can possibly entail non-isotropic
light speed, nor can any such description yield physically observable results different from those derived above (which are
known to agree with experiment). http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm
i·so·trop·ic Physics: isotropic:
(of an object or substance) having a physical property that has the same value when measured in different directions. (of a property or phenomenon) not varying in magnitude according to the direction of measurement.
The Sagnac Effect There are probably more conflicting opinions expressed about
the Sagnac effect than any other "relativistic" effect. The review here of the Sagnac effect will
be brief. The Sagnac effect is the result of a non-isotropic
speed of light and arises any time an observer or measuring instrument moves with respect to the frame chosen
as the isotropic light-speed frame. And it is here that the
Sagnac effect runs into trouble with the special theory. The special theory by postulate and definition of
time synchronization requires that the speed of light always
be isotropic with respect to the observer. And this is where the special theory is in error—the Sagnac effect illustrates
that error. Since relativists do not like to admit that non-isotropic light speed exists, they attempt to explain
the effect by other mechanisms... The presence of the
Sagnac effect in the GPS system clearly shows that none of the explanations listed above are adequate, By
Ronald R. Hatch. REFERENCES 8. E. J.
Post (1967) "Sagnac Effect," Review of Modern Physics, Vol. 39, pp 475-493. 12. Herbert E. Ives
(Aug. 1938) "Light Signals Sent Around a Closed Path," Journal of the Optical Society of America, Vol. 28, pp
296-299 http://www.worldsci.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_1783.pdf Ron Hatch missed the boat completely in his discussion
of the Sagnac effect. One must keep in mind that in his RELATIVITY AND GPS, he attempted to refute Einstein
by using the GPS. Hatch continues: "In point of fact, rotation is only incidentally involved with the Sagnac effect.
The Sagnac effect is the result of a non-isotropic speed of light and arises any time an observer or measuring instrument
moves with respect to the frame chosen as the isotropic light-speed frame." (My emphasis). The truth is that the Sagnac effect is only present in rotating reference frames. Linear,
non-accelerated movement does not cause any Sagnac effect. http://cr4.globalspec.com/blogentry/18122/GPS-and-Relativity-Misconceptions-3 A recent ingenious test by Wang et al. (2003) shows that
the Sagnac result is also achieved by sending out and back again light in a straight-line portion of the light path.
This is what this author claimed above, but it is so much more
convincing when an actual experiment has shown the same thing. I wonder what excuse will be trotted out now! Wang has succeeded in proving that the Sagnac effect applies
to straight-line motion. - page 55 of Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories
 by Al Kelly - 1965: John Chappell: "Georges
Sagnac and the Discovery of the Ether", Arch. Internat. d'Histoire des Sciences, 18:175-190, 1965 http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Display&id=48
- The Important Sagnac Effect . John-Erik Persson, Fastlagsvägen
2, 12648 Hägersten The almost hundred
years old conflict between the special relativity theory (SRT) and the Sagnac effect is analyzed. The
common interpretation of Sagnac effect as an effect of rotation is refuted. The relation between Sagnac effect and
ether model is discussed. Background Since Sagnac in 1913 discovered the effect named after him scientists have
failed to provide a unification of the effect and SRT that all could agree upon. Many different ideas have
been presented. These problems have been explained away by stating that Sagnac effect is an effect of rotation.
However, the notion of Sagnac effect as an effect of translation has been advocated by H Ives. Conclusions Sagnac effect is an effect of translation that refutes SRT and proves
the ether’s existence. Sagnac effect
is the best way to find the ether’s state of motion. References  Rayong Wang, Ti Zheng, and AipingYao, “Generalized Sagnac Effect”,
Physical Review Letters, Vol 93 Number 14, (2004)  C S Unnikrishnan, ‘Light and the observer: New experiments
and a critique of our common beliefs about light’, SPIE 6664-23  J.-E. Persson, “The Special Theory
of Relativity and the Sagnac Effect”, 14:th Annual Conference of the Natural Philosophy
Alliance (May 2007), In Absentia Available at: www.geocities.com/mail0110261847 Also in Infinite Energy, Nr 77, Vol 13, 35-40 http://www.worldsci.org/pdf/abstracts/abstracts_90.pdf - John-Erik_Persson Electrical Engineer (Retired) Interests: Special Relativity, Experiments, Gravity,
Ether Education: MSEE (Master of Science in Electrical Engineering) http://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Scientists&tab1=Scientists&tab2=Display&id=22 Electrical engineering primarily focuses on applying electricity and magnetism principles from physics to make
useful devices and materials. There is often a lot of overlap between electrical engineering and physics, especially in the
area of solid state physics. https://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=251 --
Einstein Clock Synchronization Error. Roger J Anderton R.J.Anderton@btinternet.com Einstein made the error of defining his clock synchronization so that the clocks are synchronized if they measure
light speed as constant in vacuum for inertial frames (under the conditions of Special Relativity (SR)). When
really there are various ways of synchronizing clocks. By adjusting his clocks so that light speed is defined as constant, means that he was not allowing the speed of light to be tested to see whether it was constant or not. This totally
violates scientific method to have light speed defined as constant rather than allow it to be put to empirical test.
http://www.gsjournal.net/old/science/anderton40.pdf We have not defined a common 'time' for A and B, for the latter cannot be defined at all unless we establish by definition
that the 'time' required by light to travel from A to B equals the 'time' for it to travel from B to A. This definition
by Einstein is not borne out in practice; the time for light to travel from one point to another is not always measured as
the same as the time for the reverse journey. This has been proven in the Sagnac experiments and in numerous other
experiments described earlier. It is also disproven in the daily Global Positioning System (GPS) signalling system,
where the time for the light to go around the earth in one direction is not the same as the reverse journey. Page 93
of Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories (2005) by Al Kelly. Clocks Run Slow with Respect
to What? We shall see further evidence in this chapter that atomic clocks run slow in proportion to their speeds with
respect to the the centre of the earth. This surprising physical fact was not suspected until about 1970. Page 95 of
Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories (2005) by Al Kelly. As already quoted, Hafele
(1970), in answer to the query “what would be the rate of a standard clock that is moving relative to stationary standard
clocks on the geoid?”, responded with this extraordinary statement: “The standard answer that moving clocks
run slow by the well known factor gamma is almost certainly incorrect. The 'standard answer' to which Hafele referred
was SR! Page 99 of Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories (2005) by Al Kelly. In
physics, the twin paradox is a thought experiment in special relativity involving identical twins, one of whom makes a journey
into space in a high-speed rocket and returns home to find that the twin who remained on Earth has aged more. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox Twin Paradox (from Einstein Light: relativity): http://newt.phys.unsw.edu.au/einsteinlight/jw/images/cartoon1.jpg twin-paradox-sketch before and after: http://www.twin-paradox.com/images/twin-paradox-sketch.jpg Twin Paradox ... Dr. Brewster reported at an American Rocket Society meeting. "It depends on whether you
say the space ship is moving. away from the earth or the earth is moving away from the space ship. No matter which twin brother
you are, you will see the other aging faster. When the two of you are back home, one will not be any older than the other." This contradicts Einstein. Page 281 of Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories (2005)
by Al Kelly. 145. LIFE SPAN SAME IN SPACE AS ON EARTH. Sci.News Ltr. 70:371,Dec.15,1956. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Page:Benton_1959_The_Clock_Problem_%28Clock_Paradox%29_in_Relativity.djvu/36 Twins Paradox of Relativity Is Absolutely Wrong Some Errors in Modern Astrophysics As far as they
went, they were correct, and they were right that the Earth twin WOULD see his rapidly receding brother appear to be aging
more slowly than himself, by something called Time Dilation. an unavoidable effect of Einstein's Special Relativity. The
part that those Physicists misunderstood was that the exact same situation applies to the Traveling twin. Those Physicists
only looked at ONE perspective, that of viewing from Earth, and they never considered the equally logically and correct perspective
of the spaceship traveler. Given that story, the CORRECT situation is that BOTH twins have personally aged twenty years
-- Qutoes about Einstein
and the constant speed of light: "Einstein's
theory of special relativity sets the speed of light, 186,000 miles... to a cosmic speed limit set by Albert Einstein's special theory
of relativity. ... Einstein introduced the speed of light as a mathematical
constant, c." http://www.livescience.com/16248-speed-light-special-relativity-neutrinos.html "It was the young Einstein's genius
to explain just WHY the speed of light is constant and does not depend on the speed of its source or its observer" http://www.physicsoftheuniverse.com/topics_relativity_light.html "In 1905, Albert Einstein postulated
that the speed of light c with respect to any inertial frame is a constant and is independent of the motion of the" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light - Light does not travel, light is
not a wave, Albert Einstein had it wrong, Walter Russell got it right. “Light is still. The
sense of sight cannot respond to stillness.That
which the eyes “feel” and believe to be Light is but wave motion simulating the idea of Light."
- Walter Russell (From The Secret of Light – Chapter
XII). OAHSPEBOOK OF COSMOGONY CHAPTER 1 verse 35: ...that which is called light is polarity of corporeal
needles in solution, CAUSED by the lines of vortexya. In experiments on earth, THE FLASH REQUIRETH A CERTAIN TIME TO POLARIZE
THESE INFINITESIMAL NEEDLES, AND FOR CONVENIENCE SAKE SUCH LAPSE OF TIME IS CALLED THE TRAVEL [SPEED] OF LIGHT...but there is no travel in any sense whatever. -- Sound is a wave, like
the waves of a pebble hitting water, the wave travels.Light is not a wave, Light does not travel. Light is harmony, needles pointing in the same direction. Darkness
is chaos, a disturbance, disharmony, needles pointing in different directions.
Sound can be harmonic (music).
- Here is whatHawking (2001) said ...(I still get two or three letters a week telling me Einstein was wrong). -
Page 175 of Challenging Modern Physics: Questioning Einstein's Relativity Theories (2005) by Al Kelly. -
If you find this information helpful to you please feel free to make a $20 dollar
donation and help support my research. Thank You.
If you want to donate more than $20 enter the amount here. Thank you for supporting my work.