Home, Cycles, Astrophysics, Human developmentHome, Cycles, Astrophysics, Human development 2Vortex, rotation and magnetismMore studyofoahspe.com referencesPhysics equations graphics, unified field theory, strings, lines of needles, UFOsCevorkum sub-galactic vs galactic orbitVowel sign language E-O-I greetingsMartial Arts training and Oahspe teachingsThe I'hins became extinctThe Word of John 1:1 is Vortex Motion of Oahspe Book of Jehovih 1:1Biological species concept and oxygen levels of earthFaithists working for earthly Government from Ancient to KosmonMithra, Christianity, Constantine, and OahspeDifference Between an I'huan and a Ongwee-ghanThe City of Abram (Abraham)Study-of-Oahspe for the student in class and moreExosphere and Magnetosphere of the Earth's vortexAnger leads to Satan (Ego)Whatever happened to Kosmon Black?Why the I'hins in Oahspe were not albinos or dwarfsOrigin of the color and race of the I'hins, Amish, Jefferson, Faithists, questions, dependenceOahspe scientific knowledge posted on the Internet in 2005 and 1997Engaging in, aiding and abetting war and murderBig Bang, OAHSPE, Infinity, FractalsSynchronicity 111 (111.1)Oahspe related "New Concepts" and scientific confirmation on studyofoahspe.comOahspe related "New Concepts" and scientific confirmation on studyofoahspe.com part 2Oahspe related "New Concepts" and scientific confirmation on studyofoahspe.com part 3Oahspe related "New Concepts" and scientific confirmation on studyofoahspe.com part 4Oahspe related "New Concepts" and scientific confirmation on studyofoahspe.com part 5Oahspe related "New Concepts" and scientific confirmation on studyofoahspe.com part 6How accurate are the drawings in Oahspe?All-Connected, All-Person, UnityJohn Lant Original Oahspe George Van Tassel and Jim VelasquesFaithist James May Science and OahspeGeorge Washington Prophecy of AmericaCOSMOGONY by Hugh RoseScholarly Books about OahspeEtherean fire-ship toroidal propulsion systemAngels mating with physical humansBook of SaphahMore science, Astronomy, PhysicsMore science 2 Chemistry, Physics, AstronomyHigher Advanced Knowledge of OahspeOptical Network Communications - Facial recognition - Prophets - Iesu - ZodiacSun planet, Sun photosphere, Sun's stage of developmentMaya Knowledge and Oahspe, Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, Kosmon raceInstinct, DNA, hereditaryExtrasolar planets, CEVORKUM, Light speedWeather, Climate, Dark Matter, Airborne PathogensGeology - Pole-shift - Magnetic reversal - Radiometric dating-A'jiSolar-Stellar Life Cycle - End of Earth - Death, Disease, Life After DeathBiology, Primary Vortex, Life, Computing, QuantumPhysics - Light - SoundPhysics - Magnetism - GravityThe Creator - The Father- Man - Fractals - Vortex physicsHuman origins - Pygmies - I'hinsHominidae - animal-manEarly Man - Races of Man - AnthropologyOahspe vs MormonismDinosaurs, Man, fossils, early EarthReligious History, Chinvat Bridge, Archeology, RaceConfucius, Po, China, Jaffeth & Caucasian origin & destinyThe Great Pyramid of Ancient Egypt and ThothmaMathematics of Israelites and sub-Saharan Africans, CASTA SYSTEMHell, Knots, Flash devices, Riot control, use of forceBiblical flood and the sinking of PanOahspe vs Qur'anThe Constantine BibleLooeamong, Constantine, and The Roman EmpireThe Bible, Jesus, Joshu, Essenes, AnunnakiColumbus, Catholics, Conquistadors, Protestants, CrusadesQuakers and inner lightThomas PaineUS HistoryKosmon cycle, people, TECHNOLOGY, ancestry & SHALAMSubatomic particles - String Theory - Quantum - GUTMatter - Anti-Matter, Galaxies and CosmologyWalter Russell Cosmogony Einstein Fractals Cellular Automata ManichaeanHolographic CosmosAerospace engineering, space-ships, space travelSpace clouds, Earth travel, ORACHNEBUAHGALAHTables of prophecy and historyThe Beast, Pets and AnimalsORACHNEBUAHGALAH CHARTS Cycles & ProphecyAngels rank, universe, genetics, Loo'isNordic Aliens-Angels, Greys, Neoteny and ManPower of Attraction - Visualization - Spiritual gifts, energy, ceremonySpiritual message - UFOs - EthereansCosmic Consciousness, cycles, human behavior, ZodiacCycles, Predictions, Earth events, A'jiLife Development Darkness Light CyclesNebula, Earth's atmosphere, heat & cold, eclipse, prophecyTrue PropheciesPredictionsDirect Inspiration, Walter RussellMisc. vortex, matter, periodic table, solar system, fractals, pi and cMisc. 2, E=mc2, geometry, pi and alphabet codes, chemical elementsMisc. 3, Sacred mathematics, geometry, music, harmonics, cosmology, cycles, fractals, chaosMisc. 4 life and planets, E-O-IH and geometry, DNA, facial recognitionMisc. 5 human DNA, neuroscience, 9-8-5, 33, creativity, solar powerProphecy, Pan, Harvest & DNAMagnetospheres - Solar planetary vortex - 3D HologramsEther Vortex PhysicsLanguage - Symbols - Pictographs - Creator's name - Native AmericansTornados, name vs concept, flat earth theory, UV-light, sympathetic resonance, spiritsTae and facial recognition, Ham, Shem, Guatama, I'huan, Ghan racesMathematics, Reality, primary 3, E-O-IH, Cevorkum, Ethereans, face matching, DNA, Israelites, MusicOriginal Israelites and JewsIsraelites I'huans Ghans Adinkra TesseractAfrica - Ham - I'huansETHICAL TEACHINGS OF OAHSPE, Government on Earth, digital moneyAngelic star travelers, Human origins, racesAstrophysics, OpticsOAHSPE Contradictions Imperfections CultsInfants Oahspe grades heaven progressionC allele, genetics and SNPsVisitors and CommentsDonation

12..Science is great; great learning is great; truth is great; but a greater than all is to know how to be happy. You shall not put me away saying: All the earth is sin. || I will not have it. For if you do not benefit in Jehovih's Person (that which is seen), how can you attain His Spirit (that which is unseen)? For are the two: His Person and His Spirit, not the All One?
13. Teach yourself to be happy; and to perfect yourself in the way Jehovih has created you.
- Oahspe Book Of Knowledge Part 2

OAHSPE GOD'S BOOK OF BEN CHAPTER VII:
3. I am the living mathematics;

"Not many people have the patience and scholarship to read Oahspe" - John Keel
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/SarfattiScienceSeminars/conversations/messages/3914

The Key to understanding anything you read is to take it one word and one sentence at a time. If you come to a word you don't understand then research the word until you understand it, then go back and re-read the sentence again.
I have made the word research easier for you by providing definitions for many strange words in Oahspe and on my website.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The immediate ancestors of humans were members of the genus Australopithecus click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced.  The australopithecines click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced were intermediate between apes and people.  However, both australopithecines and humans are biologically similar enough to be classified as members of the same family--the Hominidae click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced.  All people, past and present, along with the australopithecines are hominids click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced....https://web.archive.org/web/20060112074718/http://anthro.palomar.edu/hominid/australo_1.htm

    I just found this weird site that tries to tie religion, hominid fossils, and bigfoot all together.
    http://www.studyofoahspe.com/id43.html
https://warosu.org/sci/thread/8131665

Below images of Races of Man (Asu-Yak-Druk-I'hin-I'huan-Ghan-Kosmon) from Oahspe. Source: page 162 of SEVEN YEARS THAT CHANGED THE WORLD 1941-1948 (1940) by Wing Anderson.

Oahspe Races of Man Asu Yak Druk Ihin Ihuan Ghan
uploading images

Pendulum-of-races.jpg

Above drawing of the Pendulum of Corporeal Human Races shows human evolution by cross breeding (mixing) until the divine goal is reached in the Kosmon race which is balanced, strong, and grown up physically and spiritually. Each succeeding swing of the pendulum is one step closer to the goal and one swing nearer to balance. Each pendulum swing represents a race of man named in Oahspe and a step in human evolution. Ghan includes Listians, and Asu and Druk includes Yaks. Pendulum swings: 1st = extremely physical, lacking spiritual. 2nd = extremely spiritual, lacking physical. 7th = not lacking in physical or spiritual developement.  7 represents completion or peak, the 7th era at hand.  The middle or center represents balance between two opposites. The whole universe is constantly seeking balance between two opposites. Balance is the one word of the Universal Law of Creator God. Asu-man had to be created first because man was created different from any other species or animal. Asu man was created without a pre-program or instinct, at zero, and therefore had no (zero, 0.0) ability (genes) for spiritual understanding. If Asu would have had the genes for spiritual understanding then that would have been a pre-program or instinct like the animals. So the genetic ability for spiritual understanding had to be added to man by cross breeding with the angels who had it, thus came the second race of man the I'hins. But the I'hins were lacking physically (which they inherited from their angel parents who had died in infancy on other physical planets). So the I'hins not being the perfection (completion, balance) of humankind had to cross breed with the Asuans to gain more physical ability. Although the Druks were physically larger and stronger than the I'hins, they still had too much beast (Asu) blood (genetics) in them (more than 66.6 %), and too little angel blood in them (less than 33.3 %) so the druks had to cross breed (mix) with the I'hins to produce the I'huan, the first race that was physically large and strong, and had spiritual ability. Another swing of the pendulum and one swing nearer to balance and completion. Even with the racial mixing the I'hins were commanded to keep seperate and not breed with the other races, this was because it was important to keep them seperate and "pure" to be used as a breeding stock for spiritual genetics (ability), so racial seperation and race mixing was all part of the divine plan. The dividing line between mixed Druk and Mongrel is somewhere between half Druk-half I'huan, and half Druk-half Ghan. Pendulum-of-races (2013, Kosmon 165 or 33 x 5).

Above  Pendulum of corporeal human races faces. Left colum from top to botom = Asu, Druk, Mongrel. Right column from top to bottom = I'hin, I'huan, Ghan. In the center at botom = Kosmon amalgamated race.

Oahspe Book of Osiris, Son of Jehovih: Chapter XII:
8. On all corporeal worlds, Jehovih hath provided these two seasons for every race He created; a season for the development of the corporeal senses, and a season for the development of the spiritual senses. To find the mean between these is to find kosmon,
The mean is the average of the numbers: a calculated "central" value of a set of numbers.
http://www.mathsisfun.com/definitions/mean.html
-
OAHSPE: The Lords' Fifth Book CHAPTER I:
21. And as to the newborn people, they shall become the mightiest of all people in the whole world, because they came out of both darkness and light. The darkness in them shall battle all darkness; the light that is in them shall then master over their own darkness.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each race first appeared on earth according to Oahspe:
Asu - 78,000 years before Kosmon.
I'hin - 72,000 years before Kosmon.
Druk - 71,000 years before Kosmon.
I'huan - 70,000 years before Kosmon.
Ghan - 14,000 years before Kosmon.
Mongrel - 8,000 years before Kosmon.
Kosmon - about 100 years after Kosmon.
Above from pages 160-161 of SEVEN YEARS THAT CHANGED THE WORLD, 1941-1948 (1940) by Wing Anderson.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kosmon-balance-between-Evolution-Creation.jpg

^-- Removing OAHSPE's Enigma By Jim Dennon

Below: Ardipithecus and Asu side by side with very similar long torso proportion, short neck, profuse body hair, pronounced brow ridge, low sloping forehead, distance from top of head to where shoulders meet neck to where bottom part of split between breasts are closest, to the groin are very close to same. These proportions are much different in Homo erectus and modern humans. John Newbrough's drawing of Asu's legs and arms are much different proportions than Asu's (perhaps due to stylized exaggeration)  but from top of head to groin are very similar.

Ardipithecus ramidus and Asu as drawn by Newbrough in Oahspe face matched 86% extremely high.https://i.postimg.cc/PJWGrk6t/Ardipithecus-ramidus-drawing-next-to-fossil-bones-next-to-Asu-drawing-in-scale.jpg

Ardipithecus ramidus drawing next to fossil bones next to Asu drawing to same scale with projection lines. Notice the matching projection lines to brow ridges, nostrils, mouth, torso bend, and groin of Ardi and Asu showing very similar face and torso parts.
What is mostly different about the drawing of Ardipithecus ramidus and Asu is the area outside of the trunk or torso such as the limbs (arms and legs).
Much of the fossil arm bones of Ardipithecus ramidus is missing (red ovals). Asu's legs are not extended so they appear shorter than they were.

 

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xckl7mpekPY

12 seconds into the YouTube video above you can see the legs of a Gibbon appears very short when sitting and they appear much longer when they are standing, very similar to the difference between the depiction of Ardipithecus ramidus legs standing and Asu legs sitting (see images above).  

Pithecanthropus erectus and Asu Adam Oahspe Draw
image hosting over 10mb

Above: facial drawing of Pithecanthropus erectus compared to facial drawing of Asu the first man of earth in Oahspe drawn by John Ballou Newbrough. Notice the similarities in neck, facial-head shape-features and hair.
Above: facial drawing of Ardipithecus ramidus compared to facial drawing of Asu the first man of earth in Oahspe drawn by John Ballou Newbrough. Notice the similarities in neck, facial-head shape-features and hair. Asu had a human (Homo or Neanderthal) type tall nose, not an ape-like nose that Ardipithecus was drawn with. Erectus fossil was discovered in 1891 ten (10) years after Oahspe on the island of Java (Indonesia) very close to where the continent of Pan was. Ardipithecus ramidus fossil was discovered in 2009 (128) years after Oahspe in eastern Africa (Ethiopia). One of the big difference between Oahspe and other spiritual books (like the Bible) is the drawings. Oahspe has a drawing of Asu (Adam) that fits the fossil record (evidence). Asu is the roots of earth man's aggression and beast war-like behavior (numbered .666 or 2/3) that is seen in Chimpanzees:
 

Some people looking like animals-Apes. Protruding mouths, thin lips, thicker browridges, shape of head, like Australopithecus, Homo erectus, and Neanderthal.
The fossil record which is physical evidence, forensics, anthropology. The fossil record is physical forensic evidence of animal-like (ape-like) people who lived in the past. The answer from Bible believing people about fossils of Homo-erectus and Neanderthal is that they are deformed humans. Deformity is rare like a mutation. When something is the majority it is not a deformity. There was a time when the majority of people looked animal or ape-like according to the fossil physical evidence. The Bible does not explain the animal nature and physical features of early man.
The Bible does not account for the origins of man and the fossil record. All humans today have at least 50% to 60% animal-man DNA in them.
The 1st (race) of man was 100% animal-man, the 2nd (race) of man was 50% animal-man. The 3rd (race) of man was 75% animal-man. The 4th (race) of man was 62.5% animal-man. Notice how the shape of the head of the Yak below (far right) in Oahspe resembles the skull of Homo erectus (fossil record).

"Then he told me that the garden of Eden where Adam and Eve lived was found to be in Ethiopia, "same place where Lucy was found"... (Oh my) So I asked him if he knew what Lucy looks like and he said "No". I sent him across the street to the National History Museum to see the replica of Lucy's skeleton. He then said that, according to this brilliant neuroscientist that is famous around the world and is running for President (Ben Carson), the fossils that have been found are actually fossils of regular humans with deformities.
In short, these people are absolutely ignorant and deniers of Science. I put him against the wall with arguments, and he was really nervous so I let him go."
http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/oahspe-when-matings-with-angels-dont-produce-giants

 ASU, THE FIRST MAN (Ardipithecus ramidus the first hominid).
Notice the long arms and short legs of Asu (Adam) that resemble a Gibbon or Orangutan, this is very similar to the fossils of Ardipithecus ramidus.
Asu was not an ape, and was not fully man.
Asu (Ardipithecus) was quadrupedal and arboreal with longer arms relative to their leg length.
I'hins (Genus Homo) were bipedal with shorter arms than legs.
https://www.google.com/#q=genus+Homo
Above: Asu Man and Siamang Gibbon (Ape). Asu man had very long arms similar to Gibbons.
The arms of Ardipithecus ramidus were very long (it could put its hands on its knees standing up;
take a moment and try to do the same) and it had hands tipped in curved fingers well-adapted to
grasping branches (see image to the upper left). Oct 2, 2009
http://scienceblogs.com/laelaps/2009/10/02/will-the-earliest-known-homini/-
Below: Gibbon Ape, Modern Man, Asu the first Man with aprox. same torso length to show proportional arm lengths.
Notice that when the torso length is the same the Gibbon Ape and Asu Man have about the same arm lengths.
Neoteny in humans is the slowing or delaying of body development, compared to non-human primates, resulting in features such as a large head, a flat face, and relatively short arms and legs.
Neoteny of the human body is indicated by glabrousness (hairless body).
[5]  Neoteny in humans is further indicated by the limbs and body posture, with the limbs proportionately short compared to torso length;[4] longer leg than arm length;[8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny_in_humans
The I'hins had all the highlighted features above and Asu did not. The I'hins had neoteny features because of the infancy DNA that was passed down from their angelic parents who had died in infancy on other corporeal worlds.
Ardipithecus ramidus was a fruit-eater (see drawing below by John Ballu Newbrough in Oahspe). 
Above left: Asu-man reaching for berries in tree.
Above: edible berries in tree.
a berry is a small, pulpy and often edible fruit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berry

Above Orthographic projection of Ardipithecus face to Asu face showing similarities in facial design and proportions.
Orthographic projection uses parallel lines to compare the shapes of two things. Ardipithecus and Asu chins align, lips align, eyes align, brow ridges align, and slopes of foreheads align.
Above forensic reconstruction drawing of Ardipithecus ramidus and Asu drawing in Oahspe by John Ballou Newbrough
both showing 45 degree slope of forehead using Isosceles Triangle (90, 45, 45).
Notice above when put to same scale, the drawing of Ardipithecus ramidus and drawing of Asu have projection lines
from the brow ridge to brow ridge and nostrils to nostrils and mouth slit to mouth slit that match. Also the following colored lines
match :
Yellow line = 45 degree triangular slant of top-side of head.
Red line = top of brow ridge.
Green line = shape of top of eye socket and bottom of brow ride.
Blue line = bottom of eye socket to nose ridge.
Brown line = shoulder to side of neck.

-
"This is the oldest hominid skeleton on Earth," said Tim White, University of California, Berkeley, professor of integrative biology and one of the co-directors of the Middle Awash Project, a team of 70 scientists that reconstructed the skeleton and other fossils found with it.
...the first hominid to arise after the hominid line that would eventually lead to humans ...
"Ardi was not a chimpanzee, but she wasn't human," stressed White, who directs UC Berkeley's Human Evolution Research Center. "When climbing on all fours, she did not walk on her knuckles, like a chimp or gorilla, but on her palms. No ape today walks on its palms."
White said Ardi, who probably weighed about 110 pounds, had a brain close to the size of today's chimpanzees — one-fifth that of Homo sapiens — and a small face.
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2009/10/01_ardiskeleton.shtml

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. ramidus was named in September 1994. The first fossil found was dated to 4.4 million years ago on the basis of its stratigraphic position between two volcanic strata: the basal Gaala Tuff Complex(G.A.T.C.) and the Daam Aatu Basaltic Tuff (D.A.B.T.).[5]
-
Fossils are not dated directly, they are dated indirectly, they date the rocks, not the bones. Is it possible the rocks
are much older than the bones? If a human dies, is it probable that the rocks near his body are much older than his bones?
http://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/backyard-dinosaurs/questions-answers.cfm?know=a24
Carbon-14 decays with a halflife of about 5730 years by the emission of an electron of energy 0.016 MeV. 
The low activity of the carbon-14 limits age determinations to the order of 50,000 years by counting techniques. That can be extended to perhaps 100,000 years by accelerator techniques for counting the carbon-14 concentration.
"Dating by radioactive carbon has a similar uncertainty" [as lists of Egyptian kings and lengths of reigns].
- page 52 of The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World's Most Astonishing Number (2002). by Mario Livio.
Mario Livio is an Israeli-American astrophysicist and an author of works that popularize science and mathematics.
From 1991 till 2015 he was an astrophysicist at the Space Telescope Science Institute,
which operates the Hubble Space Telescope. Wikipedia
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Early or Primitive man
1. Asu = Adam 100% of the Earth, 0% of Heaven. = Ardipithecus ramidus - Australipithecus
2. I'hin = Abel 50% Asu, 50% heaven = Homo floresiensis *
* Homo florsiensis is mixed with Homo erectus, but in phenotype I consider him I'hin just as an African-american is considered black even when mixed with caucasion or american indian. I'hin was not a "pure" race anyway, the only pure race was A'su the first, all the others are mixed.
3. Original and early Druks:(Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo ergaster)
A. The original Druks = Cain 75% Asu, 25% heaven
B. Early Druk mixture (1/2 mix) = half Ihuan/half Druk = 68.75 Asu, 31.25% heaven
The original and early druks were not capable of everlasting life geneticly.
4. Yak = tallest 87.5% Asu, 12.5% heaven = Sasquatch, Bigfoot
-
Other excellent Oahspe scholars have said the druks were Homo neaderthalis also:
Augustine Cahill, author of DARKNESS, DAWN, AND DESTINTY (DRAWN FROM OAHSPE) 1965.
Ruth and Vernon, the experts who put together THE OAHSPE STANDARD EDITION!
http://oahspestandardedition.com/OSAC/AncientRacesofMan.html
Susan Martinez, Ph.D.(Anthropology) has the original Druks being Homo erectus and the latter Druks being Homo neanderthals, a half druk/half I'huan cross. Page 307 fig. 9.4 Family Tree of Man, THE LOST HISTORY of the Little People, 2013
_________________________
Modern Man
5. I'huan = 62.5% Asu, 37.5% heaven
= Homo sapiens sapiens Cromagnon (modern man)
6. Listian-Ghan = 56.25% Asu, 43.75% heaven = Modern man
7. Kosmon = mixture of all the modern races of man = Cosmic man
Druk = cross between Asu and Ihin
Yak = cross betweem Asu and Druk
I'huan = cross between Druk and I'hin
Listian - Ghan = cross between I'huan and I'hin
Kosmon = cross between different Listians, Ghans, I'huans, and Mongrels
---------------------------
Latter Druks (Homo neanderthalis):
3C. The latter Druks (1/4 mix) = 3/4 I'huan/1/4 Druk = 65.62 Asu, 34.38% heaven *
The latter Druk (1/4 mix) was capable of eternal life in heaven because they had less
than 66.6 % Asu, and more than 33.3 % heaven, above the genetic threshold for everlasting life.
An analogy to the above is the fact that in America for centuries people were still considered black who had only 1/4 black ancestry.
-
Other mixed races of modern man:
Origin of the short negritos (Ghan-Druk-I'hin mix):
Oahspe Book of Divinity: Chapter XI:
18. And it came to pass that a fourth race rose up in the world, and it was mongrel, being dark and short and less noble. The I'huans were red, and brown, and tall, and majestic; the I'hins small, and white, and yellow. And Jehovih put these marks upon His peoples that the races might be read in thousands of years.
-
Mbuti Pygmies and San people = 90% I'hin + 10% I'huan = 46.5% Angelic, 53.5% Asu..
Mongrels (Negritoes-Australoids) = 1/2 I'hin + 1/4 Ghan + 1/4 Druk = 57.8125% Asu, 42.1875% angelic.
Below Betaface facial recognition and race classification of negrito Mongrels:

Betaface | Advanced face recognition
race - asian-middle-eastern, asian, african-american (black), hispanic (european), white, middle eastern, other
https://www.betafaceapi.com/wpa/index.php/documentation

-
Octave of corporean races:
1. Kosmon
2. Ghans-Listians
3. I'huan
4. I'hin
5. Mongrel
-------------------------------2/3 mark or threshold (.666)
6. Druk
7. Yak
8. Asu
5/8 of the races are above the mark of the Beast, those 5 have beauty, symmetry of features.
8 / 5 = 1.6 (PHI) the Golden Ratio, Divine Ratio, harmony of the God Apollo (the cycle of the Orian Cheif Apollo).
Golden Ratio proportions of the human body 
The following sections of the modern human body are all in phi proportion:
finger tip to elbow…wrist to elbow
shoulder line/top of head… head length
navel/top of head… shoulder line/top of head
navel to knee… knee to end of foot.
The beauties and harmonies of Nature are an expression of the All-Person, Jehovih. 3/8 of the races are below the mark of the Beast, those 3 races had bent backs, low foreheads, receeding chins, hanging jaws, disproportionate long arms, clawlike long sharp curved fingernails.
-
8 corporeal races mentioned in Oahspe, 5 have symmetry of features, 3 don't = 3, 5, and 8 are fibonacci numbers, 8 divided by 5 = 1.6 = golden ratio of symmetry, beauty.
-
Oahspe Book of Sapah, OSIRIS, 58
Since the submersion of Pan to the present cycle of Kosmon, there have been 8 cycles to get to the Kosmon race (the 8th race)
After the cycle of Apollo most of mankind achieved symmetry, harmony of features. 5 of the 8 cycles were after the cycle of Apollo.
1. Aph = 25000 years before Kosmon
2. Sue = 21400 years before Kosmon
3. Apollo, the 1st = 18200 years B.K
--------------Symmetry, beauty, harmony = 8/5 cycles = 1.6 Golden ratio
4. Thor, the 1st = 15400 years B.K.
5. Osiris, the 1st = 12200 years B.K.
6. Fragapatti = 8900 years before Kosmon
7. Cpenta-Armij = 5800 years before Kosmon
8. Arc of Bon = 3400 years B.K. to Kosmon
--------------Kosmon, present cycle 99.9% symmetry, harmony
-
Percent human's with > 1/3 Angelic Eve blood [everlasting life]
Arc, Cycle, Etherean
1-16, Sethantes-Neph____ 1%  = 79000-24000 years B.K.
17, Aph_________________ 54% = 25000 years before Kosmon
18, Sue_________________ 62% = 21400 years before Kosmon
19, Apollo______________ 72% = 18200 years B.K
20, Thor________________ 85% = 15400 years B.K.
21, Osiris______________ 87% = 12200 years B.K.
22, Fragapatti__________ 90% = 8900 years before Kosmon
23, Cpenta-armij________ 95% = 5800 years before Kosmon
24, Lika,_______________ 99% = 3400 years B.K. to Kosmon
25, Ouranothen__________ 100% [99.99%] = Present Kosmon
http://www.angelfire.com/ia/faithist/page13.jpg
-
Page 87 of DARKNESS, DAWN, AND DESTINY, 1965 by Augustine Cahill says "I have frequently remarked in the course of this study that the I'hins were originally a fair race, descended on the one side however from Adam [Asu], a black race. The pigmentation of subsequent tribes was at first proportional to the degree of I'hin or Adamite blood [genetics], but in course of time various permutations manifested. It may be advisable at this juncture to emphasize that Oahspe clearly and repeatedly states that the day of race or colour discrimination is now past. The I'hins and the Ghans were required to keep their blood pure for spiritual reasons, but today the Adamites [Asu], the cavemen [Druks, Yaks], and the I'hins are all extinct. There is no longer any necessary spiritual virtue in the accident of a fair complexion. The lower caste Hindus [of India] for instance have more I'hin blood in them than many of the white races."
-
The mathematics of human genetics and evolutionary change:
-
Genetic ratios (earthly to spiritual) of races in Oahspe:
Early man:
1. Asu = Adam 100% of the Earth, 0% of Heaven. = 100 / .00001 = 10,000,000 : 1
10,000,000 converted to time = 10 million years split between humans and chimps.
2. I'hin = 50% Asu, 50% angelic = 50 / 50 = 1:1 = complete quantity (not quality)
3. Druks = 75% Asu, 25% angelic = 75 / 25 = 3:1
4. Yak = 87.5% Asu, 12.5% angelic = 87.5 / 12.5 = 7:1
Genetic threshold = 66.66 Beast, 33.33 angelic = 2:1 and above is imbalance
Below 2:1 genetic ratio is everlasting life, golden ratio and balance
Modern man:
5. I'huan = 62.5% Asu, 37.5% angel = 1.66:1 = golden ratio, 5/3 fibonacci numbers.
6. Mongrels = 65.625 Asu, 34.375 angelic = 1.90:1
7. Listian-Ghan = 56.25% Asu, 43.75% angelic = 1.28:1
8. Kosmon = mixture of all the modern races of man = 1.22:1
Everlasting life (spiritual ability) genetics = LESS THAN 66.6 % (a'ji) Asu (beast), and MORE THAN 33.3% (dan) Angel (Heaven) = less than a harmonic multiple (double) genetic ratio.
-
While the genetic difference between individual humans today is minuscule – about 0.1%, on average – study of the same aspects of the chimpanzee genome indicates a difference of about 1.2%. The bonobo (Pan paniscus), which is the close cousin of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), differs from humans to the same degree. The DNA difference with gorillas, another of the African apes, is about 1.6%. Most importantly, chimpanzees, bonobos, and humans all show this same amount of difference from gorillas. A difference of 3.1% distinguishes us and the African apes from the Asian great ape, the orangutan. How do the monkeys stack up?  All of the great apes and humans differ from rhesus monkeys, for example, by about 7% in their DNA.
Geneticists have come up with a variety of ways of calculating the percentages, which give different impressions about how similar chimpanzees and humans are.
Site Last Updated: 2013-12-24
http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics
-
Our closest animal relatives are the great apes: chimpanzees, orangutans and gorillas. About 98% of the DNA in your genes is exactly the same as in chimpanzees, making you as closely related to a chimp as horses are to zebras.
www.sciencemuseum.org.uk › ... › Where did we come from?
-
10,000,000 converted to time = 10 million years split between humans and chimps.
Rather than write a ratio of infinite:1, I gave Asu a measurable genetic progress (change, evolution) equal to 100 / the most number of places, whole numbers and decimal of the other races of man = 5 for Mongrels 65.625, 34.375) = .00001. Which is equivalent to the smallest possible progress or change ability of an Ape-man or Asu. If converted to time 100 / .00001 = 10 million years for Asu to evolve into Homo sapiens sapiens.
This 10,000,000 number matches a DNA study:
DNA study maps human-chimp split - NEW YORK — One of the most detailed comparisons yet of human and chimp DNA shows...
Previous genetic research has shown that chimpanzees and humans are sister species, having split off from a common ancestor about 7 million years ago. The new study goes farther by looking at approximately 800 times more DNA than earlier efforts.
The researchers, from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, propose that humans and chimpanzees first split up about 10 million years ago.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/genetics/2006-05-17-human-chimp-split_x.htm
Scientists Reset the Molecular Clock For Human Origins.
Langergraber’s team estimated the human and chimpanzee lineages split  at least 7 million years ago, but maybe even further back in the timeline, to as much as 13 million years. That’s more than twice as long as initial estimates, which placed the human/chimp split between 4 and 6 million years ago.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnfarrell/2012/12/07/scientists-reset-the-molecular-clock-for-human-origins/
-
OAHSPE.
1. AFTER the creation of man, the Creator, Jehovih, said unto him: That thou shalt know thou art the work of My hand, I have given thee capacity for knowledge, power and dominion. This was the first era.
2. But man was helpless, crawling on his belly, and he understood not the voice of the Almighty. And Jehovih called his angels, who were older than the earth, and he said unto them: Go ye, raise man upright, and teach him to understand.
3. And the angels of heaven descended to the earth and raised man upright. And man wandered about on the earth. This was the second era.
-
Book of Sethantes, Son of Jehovih: Chapter II:
29. And the record of the Great Serpent showed the firmament of Tem'yi in the third circuit of c'vork'um and dan'ha twenty-four. 2
18:2 This would make the age of the earth at that time, 9,470,500 years.
This would make the age of the earth at that time 13,172,000 years old.— [Ed.
This was during the time of Sethantes which was about 73,000 years ago.
4.7 x 2 = 9.4 million + 72,000 = 9,472,000 = 2 circuits + 72,000 years = 3rd Circuit and 72,000 years.
By my calculations the age of the earth at that time was 9,472,000 years. + 73,000 years = 9,545,000
According to Oahspe the age of the earth today is 9,545,000 years old
-
Earth Man's DNA goes back over 10 million or 13 million years, because of the angels (men) who had died in infancy or fetal on other corporeal planets and
some of those angels (men) where older than the earth. This agrees with the age of the first direct ancestors of man according to molecular biology (DNA).
-

Mathematical formula for hominid races (sub-species) ancestors of man to evolve (change) into fully modern man (Homo sapiens).
3.33 = threshold for everlasting life (dan, 33)
6.66 = number of the Beast, 666, animal-man
-
Man (Asu) was created at zero (0.00001)
BOOK OF INSPIRATION. CHAPTER XIII:
26. Thyself I gave ...the zero of thy entity
Oahspe SECOND BOOK OF LORDS CHAPTER I:
18. The Lord said: ...man was created blank;
-
For Asuans:
10,000,000 x 1.00 = 10,000,000
10,000,000 x 0.00001 = 100
10,000,000 - 100 = 9,999,900
9,999,900 / 1,000,000 = 9.9999
9.9999 - 3.3333 = 6.666 = 6,666,666 years for Asu to evolve into Homo sapiens
-
For Yaks:
10,000,000 x .875 = 8,750,000
10,000,000 x .125 = 1,250,00
8,750,00 - 1,250,000 = 7,500,000 years
7,500,000 / 1,000,000 = 7.5
7.5 - 3.33 = 4.17 = 4,170,000 years for Yak to evolve into Homo sapiens
-
For Druks:
10,000,000 x .75 = 7,500,000
10,000,000 x .25 = 2,500,000
7,500,000 - 2,500,000 = 5,000,000 years
5,000,000 / 1,000,000 = 5
5.0 - 3.33 = 1.67 = 1,670,000 years for Druk to evolve into Homo sapiens
-
For I'huans:
10,000,000 x .625 = 6,250,000
10,000,000 x .375 = 3,750,000
6,250,000 - 3,750,000 = 2,500,000 years
2,500,000 / 1,000,000 = 2.5
2.5 - 3.33 = negative years for I'huan to evolve into Homo sapiens
-
According to Oahspe the evolution of the ape-man to fully modern man never happened. Asu (Adam) was created and existed only 79,000 years ago and became extinct in 8,000 years and it was the intervention (mixing) of the angel dna that caused and sped up the evolution (progress, change) of man. .00001 is a number that is much too small for any significant change to occur within Asu in one life time, to achieve the smallest number for spiritual understanding and ability (33.3 % genetics).
-
According to Oahspe mankind was half-way in the Eoptian age of man on earth at the time of the great pyramid of Egypt, from the time of the origin of I'hin = 72,000 + 72000 = 144,000 years (Eoptian Age), not enough time for Asu, Yaks, or Druks to evolve into Modern man (I'huans or Ghans). This is probably the case on the other corporeal worlds that have human life, so that in all the universe there is no evolution (except by cross-breeding or mixing) of ape-man to fully modern man. It woud take 1.67 (for Druks) to 6.66 (for Asu) million years or never, and mankind is not on a corporeal world long enough for that to happend before he becomes extinct.
-
OAHSPE: The Lords' Fifth Book Chapter IV:21:
"For I foresaw these times, and provided angels to go in advance, to show, first, the evolution of the races of men from out of the lowest darkness; and, second, that the cause of the evolution came from the Great Spirit, and was directed unto righteousness; but had not been so, but for the Lord, your God."
-
Evolution does not happend from one species to another species, but it does happend from within a species, from one kind of man to another kind of man (not from animal to man). During the cycle of Apollo the physical form of man changed, evolved. The cause of the evolution was the thoughts of the mother manifesting in the body of the children. The cause of the evolution of man is NOT environment, it is the spirit, thought, this is why whites wouldn't turn into blacks, or blacks turn into whites merely by living in a certain country of environment.
OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY V:
12. And all of them propogated after their own kind, and do so to this day. And though the blacks might live for thousands of generations with themselves only, in any country in the world, they would never become whites. And the same rule applieth to whites and browns, and all the races of man.
-
DARKNESS, DAWN AND DESTINY (drawn from Oahspe) by Augustine Cahill, page 82 says "Apollo's task envisaged a physical transformation of the lumbering unlovely Stone Age savage into a handsome, nimble athlete, or a beautifully moulded graceful woman. Apollo's work was the foundation of harmony, symmetry, and music in human life.
How was such a task, which evolutionary theorists would ascribe to the operation of the blind and chance processes of 'natural selection' over countless generations, actually accomplished in a comparatively short period of time--as the prehistoric remains prove that it was?
It was done by angelic control, by the inspiration for instance of pregnant woman, who were caused to DREAM by night of handsome children, and who were obsessed into a passionate desire for beauty in their offspring through the worship of the IMAGES OF APOLLO by day. THE POWER OF THEIR THOUGHT processes then CREATIVELY FORMED the soul of the child in the womb, helping the coming soul to SHAPE the coming body.
Let us not underestimate THE POWER of the mother's THOUGHT..."
-
Oahspe Book of Apollo, Son of Jehovih: Chapter XIV:
1. JEHOVIH spake from the light of the throne of God, saying: Hear the words of your Creator, O ye Counselors of heaven.
3. But My physicians are tired; My nurses are tired; My teachers are tired. Be wise, O My Sons and Daughters. Who hath reformed a beggar by giving to him? What physician preventeth sickness by healing?
4. They bring forth in deformity on the earth, and ye must cure them in heaven. They squat on their haunches on earth, and they squat the same way in heaven, and ye must cure them.
5. Go ye to the root of the matter, O My beloved. Send ye down to the kingdoms of My Lords, and say to them: Thus saith Jehovih: Follow them, O My Lords! Double the number of ashars, double the loo'is; leave no young man alone; leave no young woman alone. Keep over them day and night; give them visions and dreams of Apollo. For I am concerted in heaven and on earth to re-mold the forms of the earth-born.
6. Jehovih said: Hear your Creator, O Gau! Make seven more plateaux for the second resurrection. Out of the idolatry of My Son, Apollo, will I beautify the inhabitants of the earth. And the cast and mold of men and of women shall become a great power.
13. So Jehovih changed the forms of the earth-born; but they became worshippers of Apollo; accrediting to one another Jehovih's perfection in them, according to the form and figure of the flesh. And because of the idolatry of the women for Apollo, their children were born of good flesh, and shapely; so that, in four hundred years, the hair on their heads grew long and straight, and men began to have beards. Neither considered any young man any virtue in a young woman so important as her form; nor did young women value any virtue in man so great as a well-molded form.
14. And when mortals died, and their spirits entered the first resurrection, half the labor of the asaphs, the receiving angels, was accomplished.
-
OAHSPE First Book of the First Lords chapter II: "19. The Druks inquired, saying: How shall a man live forever? Behold, ye that believe also die! 20. The I'hins answered, saying: As the voice of the Lord is unseen but potent, so is there a spirit in man unseen and potent, which shall never die, but ascend to heaven to habitations prepared by the Lord. 21. And many of the Druks pondered on these things, and THEIR THOUGHTS QUICKENED their souls within them, so that they brought forth heirs unto eternal salvation."
-
OAHSPE First Book of the First Lords chapter II: "19 speaks about the Druks who were born genetically below the ability to understand spiritually QUICKENING their evolutionary development by THEIR THOUGHTS (pondering on the things they learned from anatomically modern man) so that they brought forth heirs unto eternal salvation.
So what may have taken the Druks 1.67 million years to develope was QUICKENED to they brought forth heirs unto eternal salvation in 2 or 3 generations.
Heir: a person who inherits or has a right of inheritance in the property of another following the latter's death.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/heir
So by definition of heir the offspring of the Druks inherited the new ability after the death of the Druks who QUICKENED their souls within by pondering on the things they learned from the I'hins, so it would have taken at least 2 or 3 generations for the effect to manifest in the heirs (a grandchild could be a heir).
This means that 1,670,000 years of evolution for Druks to evolve into modern man (Homo sapiens sapiens) was sped up to just a 100 or 200 years of evolution (Ground People, or Druks lived to be 200 years old).
10,000,000 x .75 = 7,500,000
10,000,000 x .25 = 2,500,000
7,500,000 - 2,500,000 = 5,000,000 years
5,000,000 / 1,000,000 = 5
5.0 - 3.33 = 1.67 = 1,670,000 years for Druks to evolve into Homo sapiens
The REALIZATION of the Druks sped up (QUICKENED) their evolution and changed their DNA.
-
Same cycles on other corporeal worlds is evidence for same human development on other corporeal worlds:
Oahspe Book of Es, Daughter of Jehovih: Chapter VIII:
Litabakathrava, Orion chief of 240,000 years said:
15. ..I have seen many corporeal worlds arrive at the kosmon era.
-
Same cycles on other planets with intelligent life:
OAHSPE: Book of Es CHAPTER VII:
18. On all the planetary worlds it is ever the same; certain four false Gods rise up to possess the corporeal worlds and her heavens.
-
Race number 5 is the I'huan race , 5 is a fibonacci number, 5 divided by the previous and next fibonacci numbers = 1.66 (5/3) golden ratio, the genetic ratio of the I'huan. 8/5 = 1.6 golden ratio. The I'huan was the first modern man (Homo sapiens sapiens) race and the first race to have spiritual everlasting ability WITH great physical strength AND tallness. 1.6 = 1 / .6 = 1.66 = balance = symmetry of features and characteristics = golden ratio.

-
In Oahspe the first anatomically modern humans were the I'hins.
The I'hins of Ham (Africa) had the most diversity (they were of all colors, white, yellow, red, brown, and black) whereas elsewhere the I'hins were white and yellow.
OAHSPE: The Lords' Fifth Book Chapter III:
4. Of all colors (black, white, yellow, copper, red and brown) were the tribes of Ham; nevertheless, they were I'hins (Faithists), having flat nails and short arms, and of such as desired to acquire knowledge.
-
Current genetic research have demonstrated that humans on the African continent are the most genetically diverse.[152] There is more human genetic diversity in Africa than anywhere else on Earth.
Jump up ^ Jorde, L.; Watkins, W; Bamshad, M; Dixon, M; Ricker, C.; Seielstad, M.; Batzer, M. (2000). "The distribution of human genetic diversity: a comparison of mitochondrial, autosomal, and Y-chromosome data". American Journal of Human Genetics 66 (3): 979–988. doi:10.1086/302825. PMC 1288178. PMID 10712212.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
-
"Ardi"(Ardipithecus ramidus), discovered in 2009, is considered the oldest human ancestor and to date the closest resembling the drawing of Asu man in Oahspe. Ardipithecus ramidus was discovered 128 years after Oahspe.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/10/091001-oldest-human-skeleton-ardi-missing-link-chimps-ardipithecus-ramidus.html
-
John Ballou Newbrough in 1881 drew a picture of the oldest human ancestor next to a body of water, such as a river or stream. Newbrough also drew trees next to the bank and in the distant backgound looks like a savannah grassland (low vegetation).
Recent scientific findings suggest Newbrough's inspired drawings and writings about the oldest human ancestor is accurate.
-
Archaeology & Fossils December 26, 2011
Couple finds evidence indicating earliest humans lived by rivers and streams
Husband and wife team Royhan and Nahid Gani have been studying the sediments surrounding the place where Ardipithecus ramidus, aka, "Ardi," was found in Ethiopia, and have, as they describe in their paper published in Nature Communications, found that most of the evidence in the area points to a group of people that lived near a very large river.
Ardi is believed to have lived some four and half million years ago in what is now Aramis, a hot and dry part of Ethiopia, but until now, no serious study had been done on the dirt in which the skeletal remains were found. After doing so, the Gani’s discovered that the dirt was actually layers of sandstone that appear most likely to have been the result of an ancient stream overflowing it’s banks periodically, leaving behind layers of sand. Branching out, the team discovered that the sediments indicated that such a stream was actually a river, likely twenty six feet deep and over twelve hundred feet wide.
Next they turned their attention to plant material that had been preserved in the sandstone, measuring their isotopes, and found that the material had come from grassy plants, suggesting a savannah type environment. But once again, widening their area of study, they also found that there were wide changes in the types of plant material in the area. This caused them to surmise that there were patches of forests near the rivers and streams.
Based on these two pieces of information, the team suggests that it appears Ardi, who many researchers believe is our oldest found ancestor, lived in a savannah, near fresh flowing water. Some suggest that such an environment would be consistent with learning to walk upright to see over the tall grasses.
Our finding suggests that, in contrast to a woodland habitat far from a river, Ar. ramidus lived in a river-margin forest in an otherwise savanna (wooded grassland) landscape at Aramis, Ethiopia.
http://phys.org/news/2011-12-couple-evidence-indicating-earliest-humans.html
These data are interpreted to indicate the presence of major rivers and associated mixed vegetations (grasses and trees) in adjacent floodplains. Our finding suggests that, in contrast to a woodland habitat far from a river, Ar. ramidus lived in a river-margin forest in an otherwise savanna (wooded grassland) landscape at Aramis, Ethiopia. Correct interpretation of habitat of Ar. ramidus is crucial for proper assessment of causes and mechanisms of early hominin evolution ...
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v2/n12/full/ncomms1610.html
Oahspe Book of Sethantes, Son of Jehovih: Chapter X:
3. The Lord said: On our journey let us run through the valleys and the banks of rivers, for it is here that both asu and men dwell. And so they journeyed, surveying the earth as they sailed above. The country was mostly barren, not supporting man nor beast.
4. But by the river sides man dwelt, burrowing in the ground to avoid the heat by day and the cold by night.
"through the valleys and the banks of rivers, for it is here that..asu...dwell" - Oahspe
1992–1993...discovered the first A. ramidus fossils—seventeen fragments including skull, mandible, teeth and arm bones—from the Afar Depression in the Middle Awash river valley of Ethiopia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ardipithecus
File:Ardipithecus ramidus.jpg
ASU, THE FIRST MAN  -------------  Ardipithecus ramidus (Asu-like) above
Ardipithecus ramidus with his long arms, large hands, short legs, small sloping forehead, short neck, short frizzy hair, very similar chest, very similar lower torso with a slight curve on the side, round extended or bloated belly, and arboreal (trees) environment resembles the Asu drawing in Oahspe of the first race of man. Asu may have had some variations with features in common with Ardipithecus, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and Homo erectus. At the time Oahspe was written in 1881 the first early man fossils found were of Homo neanderthalis in 1856 and they did not resemble the Asu drawing in Oahspe closely like Ardipithecus ramidus does.

Asu Man
A means without (like a-moral), Su means spirit. Without spirit means without spiritual understanding. Without spirit also means without the spiritual genetics for everlasting life.
-
In India, the Veddic word asu (later changed to "Adam" in Persian) meant "without spirit" or "earth-born" (aboriginal).
This is seen also in Hebrew, where adam means "red earth", and in meshe'adam, the Azerbaijani Yeti or Bigfoot, the most animal-like version of man.
- THE LOST HISTORY of the LITTLE PEOPLE (2013) by Susan B. Martinez, PhD (in Anthropology).

Asu and I'hin (the first and second race of man)
1 Corinthians 15:47 The first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven.
-
Religious and spiritual concepts, Spiritual understanding of the ancestors of modern man:
Religious behaviour is thought to have emerged by the Upper Paleolithic, before 30,000 years ago at the latest,[1]...coinciding with the first appearance of Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens.
There are suggestions for the first appearance of religious or spiritual experience in the Lower Paleolithic (significantly earlier than...pre-Homo sapiens), but these remain controversial and have limited support.[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleolithic_religion
There is no evidence of spiritual concepts of pre-Homo sapiens man (Homo heidelbergensis, Homo ergaster, Homo-erectus, Astralopithecus, Ardipithecus Ramidus).
This agrees with Oahspe saying the Druks, Yaks, and Asuans were born not capable of spiritual understanding (no spiritual or religious concepts like a beast).
These (the Druks, Yaks, Asuans) were the races and sub-species of primate-man that were geneticly below the mark of the beast.

The Hominidae; also known as great apes[notes 1]) form a taxonomic family of primates, including four extant genera:
chimpanzees and bonobos (Pan);[notes 2]
gorillas (Gorilla);
humans (Homo); and
orangutans (Pongo).[1]
The term "hominid" is also used in the more restricted sense as hominins or "humans and relatives of humans closer than chimpanzees".[2] In this usage, all hominid species other than Homo sapiens are extinct. A number of known extinct genera are grouped with humans in the Homininae subfamily, others with orangutans in the Ponginae subfamily.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hominidae

What apes and monkeys can teach us about the roots (Asu, the Beast) of human aggression.
-

Bigfoot, also known as sasquatch, is the name given to an ape-like creature that some people believe inhabits forests, mainly in the Pacific Northwest region of North America. Bigfoot is usually described as a large, hairy, bipedal humanoid. The term sasquatch is an anglicized derivative of the Halkomelem word sásq’ets.[2][3]
Most scientists discount the existence of Bigfoot and consider it to be a combination of folklore, misidentification, and hoax,[4] rather than a living animal, because of the lack of physical evidence and the large numbers of creatures that would be necessary to maintain a breeding population.[5][6] A few scientists, such as Jane Goodall,[7] Grover Krantz, and Jeffrey Meldrum, have expressed interest and some measure of belief in the creature.[8]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigfoot

<--Notice profile of Yak has flatter nose and face than the short I'hin and the tall I'huan (modern man), larger jaws, and top of head with sagittal keel. 
---------------------------------------------

The Yak that is pictured in Oahspe as compared to the I'huan (Modern Man, 6 feet tall, 200 pounds, foot 11 inches long) has these measured/estimated statistics:

Foot = 15 1/2 inches long, flat with no arch.
Chest = 2 x thickness of modern man
Height = 8 feet 5 inches tall (full length)
Weight = 563 to 715 lbs lean and muscular, 800 to 900 lbs stocky.
Step or walk = with a deep bend in leg/knee
Posture = upright but curved, stooped or bent over
Arms = much longer than modern man's
Color = brown and black, grey or white with old age
Strength = hand grip could break a horse's leg
Dwelling = ground, burrow, cave
Clothes = none, went naked
Body hair = more than modern man due to not cutting hair, no clothes, and exposure to cold. Hair on top of head is short, does not grow long.
The above description is very similar to a Bigfoot or Sasquatch
-
Anatomy of the Sasquatch Foot
By Grover S. Krantz
Many plaster casts and photographs of footprints have been examined in detail which were reportedly made by a species of bipedal primate, the sasquatch or bigfoot. They prove not to be simply enlarged human footprints but show several peculiarities. These include flat arches, a double ball, and enlarged heels. Examination of leverage mechanics of the human foot indicates that with excessive body weight certain modifications would be advantageous. The expected modifications are the same as those seen in the reputed sasquatch footprints.
Within the last century, several hundred people have reported sightings of gigantic man-like animals in the forests and mountains of the Pacific Northwest. Hundreds more have seen the huge footprints left by these hairy creatures. Possibly ten times as many people have seen these giant primates and their tracks without reporting anything to newsmen or law officers for fear of ridicule.
The animal in question is commonly called sasquatch — based on one Indian name for it — or "bigfoot" for obvious reasons. If this animal really exists, it would probably be man's closest living relative and a member of the zoological family Hominidae. It is not human, however, in any sense of the word; all reports agree on its lack of language, artifacts, and social organization.
There are a number of reasons to believe at least certain sasquatch tracks could not have been made by hoaxers. Their obscure locations would mean that perhaps a hundred times as many tracks were laid as have been discovered. Lengths of stride and obstacles stepped over often surpass anything a man can do. Depths of imprints would require a hoaxer to carry many hundreds of pounds of extra weight, thus making the walking accomplishments even more impossible. Independent toe movements as noticed in some tracks would require a special device to accomplish.
To all these must now be added the fact that our supposed hoaxer is an expert on human anatomy with a very inventive mind. He was able to create from nothing all the details of how a foot might be redesigned to support a body weight several times that of a man. And he has continued to plant these tracks over more than a lifetime, always showing only vague hints of these anatomical peculiarities. These include great width of heel, a double ball, and a straighter row of similarly sized toes. Many sasquatch prints show what is called a double ball at the base of the big toe.
No matter how incredible it may seem that the sasquatch exists and has remained uncaught, it is even more incredible to believe in all the attributes of the hypothetical human track-maker. As Sherlock Holmes put it, "... when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." Even if none of the hundreds of sightings had ever occurred, we would still be forced to conclude that a giant bipedal primate does indeed inhabit the forests of the Pacific Northwest.
http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/91-anatomy-of-the-sasquatch-foot

Researchers Claim To Have Sequenced Bigfoot DNA.

December 1, 2012 

A genetic researcher is saying that Bigfoot DNA tests prove that the hairy creature really does exist...five years on their study of purported Bigfoot hair...researchers say their DNA sequencing suggests the animal is a human relative that developed about 15,000 years ago as a hybrid cross of modern Homo sapiens with an unknown primate species..."The genome sequencing shows that Sasquatch mtDNA is identical to modern Homo sapiens, but Sasquatch nuDNA is a novel, unknown hominin related to Homo sapiens and other primate species.

"Our data indicate that the North American Sasquatch is a hybrid species, the result of males of an unknown hominin species crossing with female Homo sapiens."..."The male progenitor that contributed the unknown sequence to this hybrid is unique as its DNA is more distantly removed from humans than other recently discovered hominins...

"Sasquatch nuclear DNA is incredibly novel and not at all what we had expected. While it has human nuclear DNA within its genome, there are also distinctly non-human, non-archaic hominin, and non-ape sequences. We describe it as a mosaic of human and novel non-human sequence."...

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/49980829/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/meet-your-uncle-bigfoot-dna-report-claims-beast-part-human/

http://sasquatchgenomeproject.org/

Genetic (DNA) evidence for Bigfoot (Yak or Monstrosities betwixt Man and Beast):
http://sasquatchgenomeproject.org/linked/authors_response_to_passing_reviews.pdf

In OAHSPE SYNOPSIS OF SIXTEEN CYCLES CHAPTER 1 verses 22,27 it describes males of an unknown hominin species (Yaks - Ground People) crossing with female Humans (I'hins) 24,000 years ago:

"22. ...there were ground people, with long arms, who were large...The ground people were brown and black, and they lived to be two hundred, and even four hundred years old...they laid hold of the I'hin women when they went into the fields, and forced them, and thus brought forth again the I'huan race...

The DNA physical evidence supports what Oahspe says about the existence (or former existence) of Druks/Yaks/monstrosities betwixt man and beast/Asuans and non human/non ape male Yaks/Druks mating with female humans tens of thousands of years ago (15 to 24 thousand years ago). The female humans were attacked and raped by man-beasts in the fields (country, rural area) when they left the city (urban area) or village.
-
Scientists have discovered that about one in thirteen people have flexible ape-like feet.
A team studied the feet of 398 visitors to the Boston Museum of Science.
This is known as a mid-tarsal break and is similar to what the Boston team identified in some of their participants.
This makes the middle part of the foot bend more easily as the subject pushes off to propel themselves on to their next step.
Dr DeSilva told BBC News how we might be able to observe whether we have this flexibility: "The best way to see this is if you're walking on the beach and leaving footprints, the middle portion of your footprint would have a big ridge that might show your foot is actually folding in that area."
The bone structure of a two-million-year old fossil human relative, Australopithecus sediba, suggests it also had this mobility.
http://bigfootresearch.blogspot.com/2013/06/scientists-say-1-in-13-people-have.html
One in thirteen people = 7.69 % of people have flexible ape-like feet. What percent of people have a midtarsal break and a 15 1/2 inches long foot like the Yak drawn by John Ballou Newbrough?
If only 7.69 % of average foot sized people have a midtarsal break, then applying that same ratio of one in thirteen to the small percent of the population that have 15 1/2 inches long feet and weigh over 480 pounds, that would make an extremely small population of people.

----------------------------------------------------

Oahspe Book of Saphah - PAN - The Primeval Tongue.
8. PAN said: The wind spake but was seen not. Asu was taught that Corpor, the Seen, was ruled over by Es, the Unseen.[Did Asu learn?]
"the sounds analyzed were determined to be too significant for human vocal cords and the tonal pitch was from something around 8 foot tall." [about the height of a Yak pictured in Oahspe]. Synonyms & Near Synonyms for yak; blabber, gabrattlerun ontittle-tattlebabblechattergabblegibberjabberscreechshout, shriek.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/yak. “If u listen closer u can hear 1 say Oh my God and WTF.... mimicking the last words of missing victims”."it’s starts at 1:40 listen close" on Missing 411 Bigfoot (sierra camp sounds). "Quite a few witnesses who've heard Bigfoot 'talking' have said the closest thing it sounds like is Japanese." or Pan language (Ja-pan remnant of Pan, mimicking or speaking Pan language). "The Druks inquired, saying : How shall a man live forever ? Behold, ye that believe also die". - Oahspe First Book of the First Lords Chapter II:19. Perhaps a Yak-Druk mixture could speak. “It’s actually sounds like a couple guys recreating old Chinese martial arts movies”. “It sounds like Japanese mixed with pug”. “The second sound is interesting because it sounds like it's mimicking human sounds, perhaps from observing people that come through the forest. “ Japanese came out of Chinese. The first branch off the Pan (Panic) trunk (one) on the THE TREE OF LANGUAGE is Chine (Two or Chinese) which is the closest of the modern languages to The original Pan languagehttp://web.archive.org/web/20140413183318im_/http://img33.imageshack.us/img33/7187/plate63pg610.jpg

A fundamental assumption in bioacoustics is that large animals tend to produce vocalizations with lower frequencies than small animals. This inverse relationship between body size and vocalization frequencies is widely considered to be foundational in animal communication, …

We address this issue here in a study of body size and vocalization frequencies conducted across 91 mammalian species, covering most of the size range in the orders Primates (n = 50; ~0.11–120 Kg) and Carnivora (n = 41; ~0.14–250 Kg). We employed a novel procedure designed to capture spectral variability and standardize frequency measurement of vocalization data across species. The results unequivocally demonstrate strong inverse relationships between body size and vocalization frequencies in primates and carnivores, filling a long-standing gap in mammalian bioacoustics and providing an empirical foundation for theories …

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep41070

Figure 3: Body length and fundamental frequency.

https://www.nature.com/articles/srep41070/figures/3 

Yaks-Bigfoot-Sasquatch.jpg

^-- Removing OAHSPE's Enigma By Jim Dennon
Are the Yaks, and Yak hybrids extinct, or are they endangered sub-species??
Are there any non Homo sapiens non Ape Hominidae still alive on earth?

Starting at the 10:36 mark of the video above it talks about Portlock, Alaska. Portlock was supposidly closed down when a bigfoot terrorized that cannery village. Moose tracks intermingled with large man-like footprints. Giant manlike tracks, 18 inches reported closing in on moose tracks and signs of a struggle. Villagers in southwest Alaska claimed to have seen a giant, hair-covered creature roaming the woods and tundra.

bigfootprintpic.gif

Compare the normal foot with arch and the flat foot with no arch (below) to the
above drawings/pictures of a I'huan (modern man) and Yak (Bigfoot or Sasquatch).

  <--Notice the arch on top of the foot of the I'huan, and no arch on top of the foot of the Yak. The Yak shows a groove midway on the bottom of the foot and enlarged heels. The I'huan does not show a midway groove (mid-tarsal break) on the bottom of foot.

Above is I'huan (modern man) foot (on left) and Yak foot on right. Lines point to parts of the Yak foot 

(no arch on top of foot), midway groove (mid-tarsal break) on bottom of foot, and enlarged heels.

Above arrow points to arched instep of human (I'huan-Homo sapiens sapiens) foot.
"The instep or longitudinal arch of the foot is not there"
The first peculiarity in these giant footprints is that they are quite flat. 
The instep or longitudinal arch of the foot is not there. In man this arch is maintained
by ligaments and by the muscular pull on tendons. Given 500 pounds or more of body
weight, these structures would not have sufficient increased strength and the arch
would have to flatten.
The Yak's estimated Weight = 563 to 715 lbs lean and muscular, 800 to 900 lbs stocky
Above lines show arched human instep and flat instep and mid-tarsal break of sasquatch foot.
Undebunking Bigfoot: Mid-tarsal Break
Mid-tarsal Break Still Indicative of Bigfoot.
In this lecture Dr. Jeff Meldrum addresses critics who contended that new research
demonstrated the "mid-tarsal break was NOT indicative of Bigfoot anymore." 
Dr. Jeff Meldrum is a Full Professor of Anatomy & Anthropology at Idaho State University
(since 1993).
He teaches human anatomy ...
His research encompasses questions of vertebrate evolutionary morphology generally,
primate locomotor adaptations more particularly, and especially the emergence of modern
human bipedalism. His co-edited volume, From Biped to Strider: the Emergence of Modern
Human Walking, Running, and Resource Transport, proposes a more recent innovation of
modern striding gait than previously assumed. His interest in the footprints attributed to sasquatch,
was piqued when he examined a set of 15-inch tracks in Washington, in 1996. Now his lab houses
well over 300 footprint casts attributed to this mystery primate. He conducts collaborative
laboratory and field research throughout North America, and the world (e.g. China, Russia), and
has spoken about his findings in numerous popular and professional publications, interviews,
television and radio appearances, public and professional presentations. He is author of Sasquatch:
Legend Meets Science (Tom Doherty Publishers), which explores his and other scientists’
evaluations of the contemporary evidence, and also affords deference to tribal people’s traditional
knowledge of this subject.  
...sasquatch maintain a knee-bent, ‘snow-shoeing’ compliant gait in which the rear foot
and forefoot exhibit separate flexibility, often referred to as a mid-tarsal flexion break. 
...the joints are very flexible to allow for a bent-knee, flat-footed gait

Tribal-Bigfoot-drawings-1.jpg
Bigfoot-size-comparison.jpg

Above size and body comparison between 3 primates, a modern man, a Gorilla, and a man-beast (Bigfoot or Sasquatch), Notice the Bigfoot is 2 feet taller than the modern man. The Bigfoot's arms are longer than his legs. The modern man's arms are shorter than his legs. The Bigfoot's chest is twice as wide as the modern man. The Bigfoot's abdomen is smaller than his chest. The Gorilla's abdomen is larger than his chest. Are Oahspe's Yaks the same as a Bigfoot or Sasquatch? The Yak in Oahspe is 2 feet taller than modern man (I'huan) and the arms of the Yak are longer than his legs. The Yak's chest is twice as wide as a modern man. The Yak's abdomen is smaller than his chest just like the description of a Bigfoot or Sasquatch. Do Yaks still exist? Oahspe speaks of "monstrosities betwixt man and beast". Oahspe says "And the monstrosities, and the Yaks, and the druks, died off, tens of millions of them. And even yet they were not extinct".First Book of the First Lords: Chapter IV - Sacred Texts.

Any surviving modern Bigfoot, Sasquatch, would probably be a cross between Yaks-Druks and half I'huans, and be very tall and large wild man. Genetically that would be quarter 2, quarter 3, and half 5 (see top of this page, Evolutionary scale of humans) = 3.75 (below the mark of the Beast and not capable of spiritual understanding or everlasting life) or a cross between Yaks-I'huans and half Druks, a quarter 2, a quarter 5, and half 3 = 3.25. 

Is Bigfoot or Sasquatch in the words of Oahspe a Sar'gis or Sargis? Is Bigfoot a materialized spirit, or a angel (spirit-man) that can take on the semblance of mortal forms?

https://www.angelfire.com/in2/oahspe3/glossary.html 

Skiing - Oct 2003 - Page 110 - Google Books Result 

-
Hairy Bigfoot, Sasquatch
Although humans appear hairless compared to other primates, with notable hair growth occurring chiefly on the top of the head, underarms and pubic area, the average human has more hair follicles on his or her body than the average chimpanzee. The main distinction is that human hairs are shorter, finer, and less heavily pigmented than the average chimpanzee's, thus making them harder to see.[75]
75.Jump up ^ Why Humans and Their Fur Parted Way by Nicholas Wade, New York Times, August 19, 2003.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human

Hairy-Man-Bigfoot-Sasquatch.jpg

Above left is a photo of a hairy modern man (ghan). Above right is artwork of a Bigfoot-Sasquatch looking like a hairy Yak-man of Oahspe.
Above on left is facial reconstruction art of Homo heidelbergensis a druk who's fossils have been found in Southern Africa, East Africa and Europe. The skulls of heidelbergensis share features with both Homo erectus and anatomically modern Homo sapiens. Highest facial recognition to Homo heidelbergensis on http://www.pictriev.com/ is Chad Michael Murray (English, Irish, Polish, German, Swiss-German) 84%.

Asu-hand-grip-and-modern-human-hand-grip.jpg
Asu-Adam-hand-grip-branch-Orangutan-South-Pacific.jpg

Above are close-up enlarged drawing of Asu man (Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough in Oahspe, and comparison to modern human grip (top) and Orangutan ape grip of tree branch. The Asu hand and grip more closely resembles that of an Orangutan of Borneo (near where the continent of Pan was broke off in the southwest Pacific Ocean) than that of a modern human.
Orangutans are intelligent and generally peaceful vegetarians.  Most of the time, they live solitary lives quietly browsing fruits and leaves high up in trees.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/primate/prim_7.htm
-
Science. 1927 May 20;65(1690):481-8.
RECENT DISCOVERIES RELATING TO THE ORIGIN AND ANTIQUITY OF MAN.
evidence of anatomy and morphology...
The brachiating hand of the ape was used as a hook, apes do not grasp a branch with the fingers and thumb but hook the whole hand over the branch, as trapeze workers do to-day-and the thumb was therefore a grave danger...arboreal ancestors...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17806528

Palmer grasp reflex = a response that was once essential for ape infants in arboreal life (grabbing and hanging from tree branches).

Palmar - palm of the hand grasp reflex.

The vestigial grasp of infants
In WEIT there is a chapter on vestigial traits, defined as those traits that are evolutionary remnants of features useful in an ancestor, but now either useless or used in a different way.
But behaviors can be vestigial, too.  One such behavior is the “grasping reflex” of human infants.  When you put your finger into the palm of an infant, it will immediately and securely grasp it.  The grasp is so tight that it’s sometimes hard to make the kid let go!  It is said — though I have never seen this demonstrated — that up to a couple months of age a baby can hang suspended from a horizontal stick for several minutes.
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/the-vestigial-grasp-of-infants/
Young infants can hold onto objects with both their hands and their feet—and hold tightly and tenaciously. They lose this behavior—which is instinctive, prompted by inserting a finger or a stick in their hands or feet—a few months after birth.
While we’re not 100% sure what it represents, I’d bet that it’s a genetic holdover from our ancestry as hairier primates.
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2014/04/08/the-grasping-reflex-of-babies-a-vestigial-trait/
The palmer grip of human babies is a genetic evolutionary remnant of Asu, which is evidence for the origin of man story in Oahspe instead of the Adam story in the Bible.

Chimpanzee-human-Asu-Adam-hand-wrist-fingers.jpg

Close-up enlarged drawing of Asu man (Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough, and comparison to modern human hand and chimpanzee hand.
The hand of Asu resembled the hand of a chimpanzee as much or more than the hand of a modern man.
-
The outer part of the hand opposite the thumb of Asu is slighlty concave (middle part curves inward toward thumb) shaped, like the Chimpanzee hand. The modern human hand has a convex (middle part curves outward away from thumb) shape opposite the thumb.
-
Evolution of the human hand:
The chimpanzee hand.
The chimpanzee hand will be taken as a model for the hand of the hominid ancestor. The most ancient hominid fossils closely resemble chimpanzees, who are genetically our nearest relatives (Sibley, 1992; Ruvolo, 1997). Pan and human lineages diverged 5–7 million years ago (Mya), about the time the first hominid specimens appear in the fossil record (Klein, 1999). The fingers, metacarpal and carpal bones of the chimpanzee hand are elongated, but in typical primate fashion the thumb is small, weak and relatively immobile
The grips of the chimpanzee differ profoundly from those of humans (Napier, 1960). For suspension from horizontal supports, chimpanzees use a ‘hook grip’ of the four flexed fingers (Napier, 1960; Marzke & Wullstein, 1996). With vertical supports, a diagonal hook grip is used (Susman, 1979; Marzke et al. 1992). The thumb may touch the support, but does not squeeze it against the palm.
Chimpanzees use this grip when flailing with sticks, but when the arm swings forward the hand tends to lose its grip, possibly due to weakness of the thumb and its inability to overlap the index finger
During its evolution, the human hand gained two unique grips, first identified by Napier. He called them the precision grip and the power grip and depicted them by the grip of a sphere and a cylinder.
According to Napier, in the power grip the clamp around the cylinder is formed by the partly flexed fingers and the palm, counter pressure being applied by the thumb, which is wrapped over the dorsum of the fingers, where it acts as a buttress to reinforce the grip. Marzke (1992a)...in the human hand. The thumb has lengthened and can be fully opposed to the fingers, which have shortened.
A longer, fully opposable thumb...also facilitates gripping a club by enabling the thumb to overlap the ends of the index and middle fingers.
...chimpanzee has been ascribed to an adaptation for both quadrupedal and arboreal locomotion (Tuttle, 1967; Dainton, 2001). The earliest known hominid hand bones are assigned to Ardipithecus ramidus kadabba from Ethiopia...The bones are said to be similar to those of a younger species, Australopithecus afarensis.
In fossils from Ethiopia and Tanzania (3.2–3.5 Mya), designated A. afarensis (White et al. 1993; Johanson et al. 1994) the hand retains chimpanzee-like features and would still have been effective for tree-climbing.
The fingers were shorter than those of the chimpanzee and the thumb is longer (Marzke, 1983, 1992b; Stern & Susman, 1983), but the fingers are long relative to the thumb when compared to modern humans (Marzke et al. 1992).
Australopithecus habilis (formerly assigned to Homo: Wood & Collard, 1999).
A. habilis gave way to Homo ergaster (African H. erectus) about 1.8 Mya. Verified hand bones from this taxon are unavailable. Those of H. neanderthalensis (200–30 kya: Klein, 1999) are similar to those of modern humans,
The fossil record indicates that...During this prolonged period of evolution, the hand underwent a profound remodelling...Two unique human handgrips were thereby produced. Called the ‘power’ and ‘precision’ grips by Napier (1956) who identified and described them...
Articles from Journal of Anatomy
National Center for Biotechnology Information
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1571064/
--
Ardipithecus ramidus discovered in Ethiopia, are virtually intact, and they show...She had extremely long fingers and an opposable thumb, with a comparatively narrow palm.
-
Ardipithecus ramidus, unlike Australopithecus afarensis, ...has an opposable big toe — rather like a thumb on the foot — that would have allowed the species to grasp branches while climbing.
http://www.nature.com/news/ancient-human-ancestor-had-feet-like-an-ape-1.10342
Ardipithecus ramidus
Key physical features.
they had grasping abducted toe characteristic of gorillas and chimps
Above and below: much magnified and contrast enhancement view of Asu's feet and toes show an opposable
large curved big toe which would help Asu grip tree limbs.
Ardi - human origins
Ardi had an opposable large toe ...
Whereas Lucy had feet much like ours Ardi's foot had a long, curved big toe that would help her grip tree limbs but the other four toes were stiffer and flat which would have been helpful for walking on two legs.
http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/evolution/ardi_human_origins.html
Ardi's foot (right) has an opposable toe for grasping branches.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/326/5960/1598.1.full?rss=1
The grasping reflex is evident in the feet, too. If you put your finger along a baby’s toes from the sole side, it will grasp with those toes.  And when a baby is sitting down, its “prehensile” feet assume a curled-in posture, much like what we see in an infant or an adult chimp.
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/the-vestigial-grasp-of-infants/
The Plantar grasp reflex is a genetic holdover from our Asu ancestry. The Plantar grasp reflex is more evidence that the human origins as described and pictured in Oahspe is accurate.

Asu-Adam-Ape-short-legs-bent-knees.jpg

Above comparison of the drawing of Asu man (Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough in Oahspe to a photo of a Gorilla sitting. Notice both the Asu and the Ape have short feet, short legs and bent knees of about the same proportional size. Notice how Asu (Adam) is sitting down on the ground like the ape (gorilla), leg and knees bent and close to buttocks, leaning to the side and supporting himself with one arm. Apes (like the orangutans and gibbins especially) have very long arms with...comparatively short legs...Newbrough in Oahspe drew Asu (Adam) the first man with very long arms and comparatively short legs. Asu's long arms like with the apes helped him in traveling efficiently in arboreal settings by climbing, swinging and grabing branches, fruits and leaves high up in trees (as is seen in the drawing in Oahspe).
-
Asu appears to have a longer pelvis or hip region (for quadrupedal locomotion) than a modern man, more like a ape. Asu's short legs and short feet is adapted for quadrupedal locomotion.
Longer legs are needed for bipedalism to help support at least 2.5 times their body weight.
Modern man has longer feet and developed arches for more efficient support of their bodies.
-
The very long arms to short legs ratio helped Asu with walking on all fours on the ground. Form follows function, behavior, and intelligence. Because the Creator Jehovih made the first man different than any other animal, without a pre-program or instinct, man would have been lacking in knowledge, intelligence, and the genetic ability to understand and learn, so he would not have the form of walking upright on two feet (bi-pedalism) which frees the hands for carrying and using tools and building things that the mind concieves of. Since Asu was made without the mental ability to conceive of inventing and building things his form would have matched his behavior and ability, and he would not need to walk upright and therefore he would mostly be a quadrapedal and arboreal traveler like the apes, and having very long arms and comparitevly short legs would be in harmony with that type of mental-spiritual state. His hands would have been more advantages for grabing branches and traveling in the trees than for holding a tool, writing a book, or typing on a computer, thus form follows function and behavior. The purpose of Asu man was to be used as a base for physical developement for future races and sub-species of man, it was not intended to be a complete and perfect man like the Adam of the book of Genesis in the Bible. Adam in the book of Genesis in the Bible appears to from the story in the Bible to have been created a complete perfect man already knowing how to walk, speak, capable of understanding the Great Spirit, etc...it appears he was created with that ability like a pre-program or instinct like an animal. The first race of man was not made in the image and likeness of God (of the dust of the earth, not spiritual), but the second race of man (the I'hins) was in the spiritual image and likeness of heaven (God). The first race was of the earth only, earthly without (zero) spiritual understanding, and having no (zero) ability (no genetics) to understand spiritual things (such as creating things, or abstract thought).
-
Asu and I'hin (the first and second race of man)
1 Corinthians 15:47 The first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven
-
To be of the earth only, or of the dust of the earth means without spiritual ability or understanding = zero, like corpor. Corpor = zero.
-
OAHSPE'S BOOK OF COSMOGONY Chapter 8:1
1. ..To ethe give motion one hundred, or ninety-nine (as the case may be); to corpor give zero, that is, no motion (of itself); to ji'ay give sixty-six; to a'ji give thirty-three.
The numbers above represent percent of spirital ability or power, it applies to mankind.
-
Asu (Adam) man was given the number of corpor = zero
The I'hins (Abel), I'huans, Ghans, Mongrels, Kosmon, and Iesu races were given the numbers from 66-99.
The Yaks were given the number 11-12.5 (Yaks were 87.5% Asu, 12.5 numbers from 100% earth-Asu).
The Druks (Cain) were given the numbers 33 (1/3) to 66 (2/3), a'ji, the mark of beast, the mark of Cain (war).  A'ji is 1/3 ethe, and 2/3 corpor.
The Ethereans, Orians, and Nirvanians are givern the number of ethe = 99-100
-
Man created blank (zero), animals with instinct
Oahspe SECOND BOOK OF LORDS CHAPTER I:
17. Man inquired of the Lord: Thou hast shown the bird how to build her nest, and the carnivore how to scent the subtle track of his prey, and the spider to weave his net; but as to the manner of man's house, or as to herbs that are good or are poisonous, thou has not shown man.
18. The Lord said: All the instinct that is in the bird, or beast, or fish, or insect, or creeping thing, was created with them, but man was created blank; and yet man shall attain to more subtle senses than any other living creature.
-
OAHSPE BOOK OF INSPIRATION. CHAPTER XII.
7. Thus differently created I man from all other things on earth;

Asu-Adam-first-man-face-drawing-art.jpg

Close-up enlarged drawing of Asu man (Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough in Oahspe, showing a powerful build, human-type face, thin lips, tall nose, large brow ridges, small skull-brain capacity, low cranial vault, sloping forehead, top of head is crested (pointed head), hair covering most of the body, not including the face with the exception of the cheeks and jawline, patches of bare skin on the chest, neck is very short and thick, short tightly coiled matted hair on head, disproportionately long arms compared to a modern human, a relatively pronounced bone above the eyes, large eyes.
-
Sagittal crests are found in robust great apes, and some early hominins (Paranthropus). Prominent sagittal crests are found among male gorillas and orangutans, and do occur but only rarely in male chimpanzees...
The largest sagittal crest ever discovered in the human lineage belongs to ...Paranthropus aethiopicus...the earliest known robust hominid ancestor and the oldest robust australopithecine discovered to date
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittal_crest,
-
Some of the male Australopithecus afarensis had small sagittal crests.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/hominid/australo_2.htm

Evolution-change-of-man.jpg

__^__Left, fossils of human ancestors__ ^__Right, races of man in Oahspe__
Above skull and head comparisons of the progress of the races of man in Oahspe to the fossil record:
Fossils left side-----Right side Oahspe races
_________________________________
Modern Human-----I'huan, Ghan, Mongrel
Homo erectus-------Yak, Druk type
Australopithecus---Asu-like variation 
Ardipithecus--------Asu-like

Natural-range-of-apes.gif

Above map showing the natural habitat range of modern apes, all in the tropical regions of Africa, southeast Asia,and Indonesia. Borneo where the gibbons and orangutan apes are found is close to the sunken continent of Pan where Oahspe said Asu man originated (see map below).

panmap.jpg

Orangutans May Be Closest Human Relatives, Not Chimps
Orangutans, not chimpanzees, are the closest living relatives to humans, a controversial new study contends.
By contrast, humans share at least 28 unique physical characteristics with orangutans but only 2 with chimps and 7 with gorillas, the authors say.
The finding, which has the potential to spark a radical rethink of human origins, is being met with caution.
But looking at physical traits rather than genetic ones, orangutans are a better match, Grehan and Schwartz say.
Tell-tale features shared by both orangutans and humans include thickly enameled molar teeth with flat surfaces, greater asymmetries between the left and right side of the brain, an increased cartilage-to-bone ratio in the forearm, and similarly shaped shoulder blades.
"A hole in the roof of the mouth that was supposedly unique to humans is also present in orangs," Schwartz said.
"Humans and orangs have the widest-separated mammary glands, and they grow the longest hair," he added. "Humans and orangs actually have a hairline, in contrast to virtually all primates, where the hair comes down to the top of the eyes."
The team also highlighted orangutan-type traits in the teeth and jaw remains of ancient fossil apes from Africa and Europe.
Based on their analysis, the authors suggest "that humans and orangutans share a common ancestor that excludes [living] African apes."
But orangutans are native to Southeast Asia, which creates a problem: How did humans evolve in Africa if we are so closely related to the geographically distant orangutan? (Explore a human migration time line.)
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/090623-humans-chimps-related.html
Humans More Related To Orangutans Than Chimps, Study Suggests
June 18, 2009 — New evidence underscores the theory of human origin that suggests humans most likely share a common ancestor with orangutans, according to research from the University of Pittsburgh and the Buffalo Museum of Science. Reporting in the June 18 edition of the Journal of Biogeography,
Paleoanthropologist Peter Andrews, a past head of Human Origins at the London Natural History Museum and coauthor of "The Complete World of Human Evolution" (Thames & Hudson, 2005), said that Schwartz and Grehan provide good evidence to support their theory. Andrews had no part in the research, but is familiar with it.
"They have good morphological evidence in support of their interpretation, so that it must be taken seriously, and if it reopens the debate between molecular biologists and morphologists, so much the better," Andrews said. "They are going against accepted interpretations of human and ape relationships, and there's no doubt their conclusions will be challenged. But I hope it will be done in a constructive way, for science progresses by asking questions and testing results."
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090618084304.htm
The morphological data on which their study is based include features of anatomy, reproductive biology, and behavior. For example, among the great apes only humans and orangutans have thick tooth enamel, long hair, male facial hair, concealed ovulation, a preference for private, face-to-face mating, and an ability to construct shelters and beds.
No doubt this is going to cause a fair amount of debate in the scientific community. Which is great. Stay tuned.
Reference:
John R. Grehan and Jeffrey H. Schwartz (2009). Evolution of the second orangutan: phylogeny and biogeography of hominid origins Journal of Biogeography, in press.
http://pleiotropy.fieldofscience.com/2009/06/orangutans-to-replace-chimpanzees-as.html

Gestation-periods-human-apes.jpg
Hominid_Chromosomes-Apes-Human.gif

Above two charts show man and apes are very close in gestation periods AND chromosome numbers.

Asu-man was the borderline (dividing line) between apes and man, animal-man, Ardipithecus ramidus.

Chromosomal differences between Homo and Great Apes

Humans have a characteristic diploid chromosome number of 2N=46 whereas the other Great Apes (orangutans, gorillas, and chimps) are all 2N=48. The large metacentric Chromosome 2 of Homo appears to be the result of a fusion between two smaller telocentric chromosomes found in the other Great Apes. In the figure above, Q-banding patterns in the chimp acrocentrics are homologous to those of the 2p (short) and 2q (long) arms of human Chromosome 2: the alignments are indicated. As well, ape telomeres (the ends of chromosomes) characteristically consist of tandem repeats of the motif 5'-TTAGGG-3'. Such sequences are also present In the human centromere (the middle of the chromosome), but at one point the order changes abruptly to 5'-CCCTAA-3', the reverse complement of the standard pattern, as predicted by a telomere to telomere fusion of ancestral ape-like chromosomes.

See extended discussion at [http://www.gate.net/~rwms/hum_ape_chrom.html]
http://www.mun.ca/biology/scarr/Human_Ape_chromosomes.htm

"two chromosomes that are still separate in the great apes fused together in the human lineage to produce our chromosome 2."
- page 128 of Bryan Sykes' 2001 book (7 Daughters of Eve)

Oahspe said Adam (Asu) the first race of man originated on earth 79,000 years ago.
"everybody who is alive today is descended from one man and one woman who lived somewhere around 50,000 to 100,000 years ago."..." with modern DNA testing, there is more and more scientific evidence that I am right"
http://www.anusha.com/allmen.htm
-

What do you think a Sasquatch is?
There is a legend that says that there were three groups of people living on the Earth and they were the big people, the little people, and the Yakama. They all live together off the land and followed the traditional ways.
Along came the (early settlers) and they started to show the Yakama their tools and the Yakama started to follow them. The big people and the little people saw what was happening and they went up into the mountains they wanted nothing to do with the new ways. The Yakama weren’t allowed to go with them because they were following the white men and using their tools.
http://www.bigfootlunchclub.com/2013/04/today-in-bigfoot-history-apr-07-2006.html
White men (early settlers) = Ghans of Oahspe
Oahspe  BOOK OF OSIRIS, SON OF JEHOVIH. CHAPTER I:
12. Not like lambs are the Ghans, but lions untamed, born conquerors, with seed to learn and reason toward all things, faith in mastery, but not faith in Jehovih.

Yakama = I'huan-Ghan (Ongwee-ghans) of Oahspe
big people = Yaks of Oahspe
little people = I'hins of Oahspe
(see plate below)

Sources for images of races in Oahspe:

3b. Types of races -I'hin, I'huan and Yak.

http://www.angelfire.com/in2/oahspe3/plates.html

http://www.angelfire.com/in2/oahspe/images/plateA4pg57B.jpg

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQXdNIOA5D1rthYPhBQ0eCNsJv9Ks8cPLfK-8bSf4fOz2L0qQEO

http://web.archive.org/web/20170319210058/oahspebible.org/1stlords2.html

http://web.archive.org/web/20010802023950/http://www.angelfire.com/in2/oahspe3/plates.html

Ihin-Ihuan-Yak.jpg



The curve of your lower back absorbs shock when you walk. It is uniquely human. You can see in John Newbrough's (inspired) drawing above (in Oahspe) of the I'hin and I'huan (anatomically modern man) the curve in the spine of the lower back. The Yak (87.5% Asu-Adam) is missing the lower back spinal curvature needed for fully bipedalism.
-
Oahspe said Yaks which were 87.5% Asu, sometimes walked erect (like Homo erectus), and sometimes walked on all fours (which indicates Asu walked on all fours).
OAHSPE: First Book of the First Lords Chapter II:
5. ...And the Yaks did not walk wholly upright, but also went on all fours.
OAHSPE chapter 1:1,2,3:
AFTER the creation of man, the Creator, Jehovih...called his angels, who were older than the earth, and he said unto them: Go ye, raise man upright, and teach him to understand.
And the angels of heaven descended to the earth and raised man upright. And man wandered about on the earth. This was the second era.
"raised man upright" means Asu (Adam) did not walk wholly upright, but also went on all fours. The fossil record (skeletons) of early man is objective evidence that the inspired drawings of early man by John Newbrough (in Oahspe) are true.

Spine-skull-bi-pedalism-early-man-modern-man.jpg

The spine of a chimpanzee connects with the skull at the back, holding the head at an angle.
The spine of humans connects with the skull underneath, stabilizing the head when walking upright.
Your spine connects with your skull underneath and near the center, holding your head firmly upright.
Comparing drawings of skulls of a early human (left), and modern human (right) with inspired drawings by John Ballou Newbrough of a I'huan (modern man) head and neck and Yak (87.5% Asu) head and neck.
Notice the spine of the I'huan (modern man) connected with the skull underneath stabilizing the head when walking upright.
Notice the spine of the Yak (87.5% similar to Asu) connects with the skull near the back, holding the head at an angle.
Notice the difference in John Ballou Newbrough's drawing of the jaw of the I'huan and the jaw of the Yak. The jaw of the I'huan is angled going down from the back to the front, matching the skull of a modern man (Homo sapiens).
The jaw of the Yak is straight from the back to the front, level, matching the skull of a early hominid (Australopithecus or Homo erectus).
John Newbrough's inspired drawings in Oahspe of the I'huan, Yak, and Asu (Adam) indicates the beast-human development and percent of human bipedalism and beast quadrupedalism.
Quadrupedalism is a form of terrestrial locomotion in animals using four limbs or legs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrupedalism
-
Image courtesy of Karen Carr Studios.
Walking Upright | The Smithsonian Institution
http://humanorigins.si.edu/human-characteristics/walking
-
Physical anatomy is a manifestation of spiritual ability. Man walks upright to free his hands to hold tools and build things that his mind and spirit creates. The bird does not have arms and hands.
-
The spiritual and physical is connected by genetics (vortexian record). Vortexya (c, light) is intermediary between ethe and corpor. Light (electromagnetic record) is both wave (etheic) and particle (corpor). The I'hin received his spiritual ability (genetics) from the angels (heaven). Asu lacked the spiritual genetics and received his physical ability (genetics) from the beast (a'ji, nebula, semuan firmament, earth).
Asu and I'hin (the first and second race of mankind)
1 Corinthians 15:47 The first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven. Adam (Asu) was of the dust of the earth lacking spiritual heavenly genetics (ability). Jesus was not the second man, angels (from other planets) walked the earth (and were called men) before Jesus. Adam stood for mankind. Man refers to mankind or race or sub-species. The second man of heaven (with heavenly-spiritual genetics) was a type, race, or sub-species of mankind called I'hin or Abel (able, spiritual ability). Adam (Asu) was the first man, Eve (the angels, Es) were the first woman, Abel (I'hins) was actually older than his brother Cain (druks) and was the second man. The Druks had the mark of the beast (the mark of Cain) and were war-like and slew the I'hins.

Human-genetics-pendulum.jpg

Above drawing of the pendulum of human genetics, angel-man, beast-man, dan, a'ji, spirit, flesh, 1/3, 2/3, 33, 66, and the harmonic relationship to prophetic numbers and a logarithmic spiral galaxy (Cosmogony and Prophecy).
-
Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Chapter 7:18: Tables of times and measurements
Loos, 33, Loo'is are angels that are Masters of Generations, 33 is the number of Man (human) and the number of a generation (genetics). 33 (33.3 %) is also the number or percentage needed for fully modern man (man 33 or 3/3, 1/3 or 33.3 % angel), the threshold for everlasting life, spiritual understanding and ability, the seperation or dividing line between fully man (spiritual-man) and beast-man or animal. Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy: Chapter VII: 17....from one to a thousand for each and every characteristic designated. Number man 1 and 33,...[1 = 1/3 + 2/3 = 3/3 or 33, composed of harmonic multiples and divisions of prophetic cyclic numbers 11, 22, and 33, and logarithmic spiral galaxy percentages]. Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy: Chapter VIII:7. Consequently the two most important periods for the prophet's consideration come within thirty-three and sixty-six, or, as they of old said, man and beast. In which measure man is divided into two parts (man and beast), Man (human) = 33. Number man 1....divided into two parts = .33 and .66, 1/3 and 2/3 = 1.  Man is divided into two parts = double helix (spiral) DNA structure = logarithmic spiral galaxy. Man 3/3 (33), DNA and galaxy is divided into two parts, light and darkness, dan and a'ji, 1/3 and 2/3 spiral.
-
Angel
. A spirit man. Su, also, su-gan, and gans-spe. [1 part of man, 1/3]
Beast. The animal man. The earthly part of man. [2nd part of man, 2/3]
Dan. Light. A cyclic dawn, as the Arc of Spe'ta or Arc of Bon....A dan lasts about thirty-three years. [dan lasts 33 years = 1/3 = 33]
http://www.angelfire.com/in2/oahspe3/glossary.html
33 dan in Oahspe:
OAHSPE: Book of Aph CHAPTER XIV:
3. ...thirty-three is the division of dan corresponding to one hundred dans to each cycle. 2
2 Thirty-three years is one generation or mortal dan: thirty-three hundred years is one cycle or dan of the earth's life.

OAHSPE Plate 48.--THE CYCLIC COIL.
(See Oahspe Book of Cosmogony) The numbers of the beast shall be sixty-six, and six hundred and sixty-six, and the parts thereof. Because in the coil of the cycle, behold the distances are two thirds of a circle.

In a double-helix (DNA) corkscrew structure (below) each spiral or loop is 1/3 of the total. Each loop is spaced 1/3 distance apart. Second loop is spaced 2/3 distance of total. The whole (double-helix) cycle is divided into two parts spaced 1/3 distance apart.

Spiral-coils-loops-33-66.jpg

Harmonic, 2 and 8 based structure of DNA, Computer code, and spiral galaxy structure.
The DNA structure is a microscopic logarithmic spiral galaxy (double-helix primary vortex). DNA is composed of 2 strands, twisted together, 2 coils of a cycle. DNA like computer code is composed of a 2 base system, 0 and 1 for computer code, dan and a'ji, or ethe and corpor for DNA and spiral galaxies. The computer codes of zeros and ones contain information program instructions. DNA code contains genetic information instructions. Spiral galaxies contain a'ji and dan, ethe and corpor which influence genetics and behavior. Computer code bits is in harmonic multiples and divisions of 8. The two (2) base system is a harmonic division of 8. Multiply 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 4, 8, 16, 32 which are harmonic parts (divisions) or multiplications of 8 which are 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, etc...start off with 1 whole and multiply x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, etc... you get all divisions or multiples of 8, like harmonic musical notes or computer bits. The 1 whole man like DNA and the spiral galaxies is divided into 2 parts, multiplied by 2, by 2, by 2 etc.. This shows up in the 22 year prophetic numbers cycles, 22 = 1 whole cycle, divided into 2 parts, 1 part = 11 x 2 = 22, 11 x 3 = 33, 11 x 6 = 66, 11 x 9 = 99 +1 = 100, x 2 = 200, x 2 = 400 (Mayan Baktun), harmonic multiples of the base 11. Modern human DNA contains both (2 base) Asu and Angel genetics twisted together in a spiral-helical staircase but evolved (multiplied) to include the genetics of I'hin, Druk, I'huan, Mongrel, Ghan, and Kosmon, 6 plus Asu and Angel = 8.
-
Computer binary code 8 bit-system:
1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 8192 16384 32768.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8630344/understanding-binary-code
-
An extremely common operation on numbers in computers is to operate by two, as in divide, multiply, take to the power of or take the square root. Most of these operations massively benefit from binary digit storage.
Binary wasn't chosen thoughtlessly, there are good reasons.
http://scientopia.org/blogs/goodmath/2012/06/03/numeric-pareidolia-and-vortex-math/
-
The simplest form of increase in the number of individuals (population growth) is binary cell division.
Given binary cell division, we expect the number of cells thru time to follow the powers of 2, namely 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, etc.
This is basic pattern of geometric growth.
http://www.uic.edu/classes/bios/bios101/x113_files/outline/index.htm
-
A number of cosmological studies show that galactic superclusters exist at regularly spaced intervals:
Observations of the redshift distribution of galaxies in narrow (~ 40 arcmin) pencil-beam surveys to z  0.3 (Broadhurst et al. 1990; hereafter BEKS) reveal a highly clumped and apparently periodic distribution of galaxies. The distribution features peaks of galaxy counts with an apparently regular separation of 128 Mpc, with few galaxies between the peaks.
http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Sept01/Bahcall2/Bahcall9_2.html
Megaparsec (Mpc)
One parsec equals about 3.26 light-years or 30.9 trillion kilometres (19.2 trillion miles).
A distance of one million parsecs (3.26 million light-years or 3.26 "Mly") is commonly denoted by the megaparsec (Mpc). Astronomers typically express the distances between neighbouring galaxies and galaxy clusters in megaparsecs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsec
3 / .26 = 11.53 = 11 prophetic number
3.26  / 1.09 = 2.99 within
3.26  / 1.1 = 2.963 within .037 harmonic multiple of 1.1
The prophetic cyclic number 11 (the base) is a harmonic multiple (x 10) of 1.1
111 (gow, dan, light) is a harmonic multiple of 3.26 (light-years, parsec).
111 / 3.26 = 34.04 = within .04 harmonic
The universe shows a harmonic multiple periodic (cyclic) spacing (cosmogony-cosmology) of an octave (8).  128 Mpc is a harmonic multiple of 8 the number of harmony, just like the computer bit code. Harmonic divisions and multiples of 8 are 1/256, 1/128, 1/64, 1/32, 1/16. 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 Mpc, 256, etc... 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emergence of the Human 'SuperBrain' 75,000 Years Ago
There is archaeological evidence for the evolution of a human "super-brain" no later than 75,000 years ago that spurred a modern capacity for novelty and invention, according to John Hoffecker, an archaeologist at the University of Colorado.
Hoffecker says there is abundant fossil and archaeological evidence for the evolution of the human mind, including its unique power to create a potentially infinite variety of thoughts expressed in the form of sentences, art and technologies.
An internationally known archaeologist...Hoffecker.
While anatomical fossil evidence for the capability of speech is controversial, the archaeological discoveries of symbols coincides with a creative explosion in the making of many kinds of artifacts. Abstract designs scratched on mineral pigment show up in Africa about 75,000 years ago and are widely accepted by archaeologists as evidence for symbolism and language. "From this point onward there is a growing variety of new types of artifacts that indicates a thoroughly modern capacity for novelty and invention."
Humans were producing perforated shell ornaments, polished bone awls and simple geometric designs incised into lumps of red ochre by 75,000 years ago. "With the appearance of symbols and language -- and the consequent integration of brains into a super-brain -- the human mind seems to have taken off as a potentially unlimited creative force," he said.
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2013/06/emergence-of-the-human-superbrain-75000-years-ago-the-neurologic-internet.html
The evolution of the human "super-brain" occured when Angels bred with Asu and produced the I'hin 73,000 years ago according to Oahspe.
-
In OAHSPE SYNOPSIS OF SIXTEEN CYCLES CHAPTER 1 verses 22,27 it describes a hominin species (Yaks - Ground People) that laid hold of the I'hins when they went into the fields (wilderness).
According to Oahspe these Ground People have been grabbing children size people as far back as 24,000 years ago.
I'hins were very short, the size of a modern child (3 to 4 feet tall).
-
1855: SE Oklahoma, Choctaw Territory. Bigfoots had been raiding Choctaw settlements for some time, mostly stealing crops. But then they started stealing human children, apparently to kill and eat them, and the Choctaw had had enough. A party, organized by Joshua LeFlore, set out to get the Bigfoots. They tracked them to a giant mound with the bodies of 19 human children the Bigfoots have been kidpnapping and eating. The Bigfoots are covered in hair, and the bad smell of their shit and piss is everywhere. Most of the humans’ horses rear up and throw their riders, which is what horses do when they see Bigfoots.
The humans attack the Bigfoots, and LeFlore empties his revolver at one, but it’s useless. The Bigfoot kills LeFlore’s mount with a single blow and then tears off LeFlore’s head. The rest of the Indians open up with .50 caliber Sharp’s buffalo rifles (designed to drop a buffalo) on the beasts, from experience aiming at their heads, as this is the best way to kill them. Two Bigfoots drop. A Choctaw Indian hunts down LeFlore’s killer and finishes it off with a hunting knife. Then he decapitates it for good measure. 3 Bigfoots were killed in all.
The Indians bury what’s left of the kids, then bury their leader, giving him a 21 gun salute. Then they make a bonfire and burn the Bigfoots on the fire. They ride home, heading for bad dreams, maybe lasting a lifetime.
Many Western tribes describe areas of their territory that were totally off limits, and the Indians refused to go there, for these were the territories of the Bigfoots. These territories were full of game, but the Indians were so terrified that they avoided them like the plague. Why would Indians avoid a forage-rich area area due to creatures that don’t even exist? Bigfoots have probably learned to fear and respect us due to our weaponry. These creatures still abduct , rape, and eat humans. Check all the missing persons in America’s National parks, The things are expert killers.
http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/human-bigfoot-war-oklahoma-1855/
--
Similarities:
- dogs refusing or unable to pick up victims scent. - Missing-411 books
"hunters attempt to pursue the creature with dogs, but the dogs refuse to give chase." - The_Legend_of_Boggy_Creek
"Several attempts were made to track the creature with dogs, but they were unable to follow its scent" - Fouke_Monster (Wikipedia)
-
a few months later James Crabtree was squirrel hunting ..."there was something strange about that evening, I couldn't put my finger on it, It was just a feeling I had. There didn't seem to be as many birds and little small animals around, they seemed mighty scarce.
It stepped right out in plain sight, right out there in front of me. It was some kind of a thing I've never seen before, well he stared at me for a little while and just slipped out of sight and I never saw him agian." - James Crabtree, _The Legend of Boggy Creek_
-
First, they said, they realized that all sound had disappeared around them - the
sounds of nature. ... - "Missing 411" Books
-
the ever-popular Bigfoot emerges frequently in the Pacific Northwest and Texas has reported numerous encounters with its aptly named Big Thicket Wild Man. Yet, few know that a member of this brotherhood of hairy hominids makes a home here in Arizona. He's known as the Mogollon Monster.
Those who say they've crossed paths with the beast regularly describe an eerie silence prior to their encounter, an appreciable stillness in the woods that commonly surrounds predatory animals.
http://www.weirdus.com/states/arizona/bizarre_beasts/mongollon_monster/index.php
-
a couple of cases that kids say a bear took them and protected them. - Missing-411 books
"the creature, which she initially took to be a bear," - Elizabeth Ford on Fouke_Monster
-
Tiny Walhalla Girl Is Kidnaped By Large Black Bear
Katie Flynn, three-year-old child, was captured and carried away by a huge black bear
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=110&dat=19320422&id=eFscAAAAIBAJ&sjid=zVMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2256,3854001
Page Eight .Tiny Walhalla Girl Kidnaped By Large Black
Child Tells own story...
"Big dog came up to me, took me in his arms and walked away with me"....
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=110&dat=19320422&id=eFscAAAAIBAJ&sjid=zVMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6994,3890992
What kind of "Big dog" carries away a child "in his arms"?
"took me in his arms" is plural, "arms" (means 2 limbs) if the hairy creature took her in his arms and "walked away" then it was walking on 2 limbs (bi-pedal locomotion).
-
Newspaper: The Morning Herald › 1951 › June › 9 June 1951 › Page 2
Missing Children Found [In Mountains- SANTA FE, N.M]...Youngsters Wonder From Picnic...Three small children were found tired, hungry and thirsty but otherwise unharmed tonight, after 28 lonely hours in the rugged Sangre De Crlsto mountains. On hearing the news, their parents burst into tears. While hundreds of searchers trudged the Jagged, steep mountains with lanterns and flashlights last night, the three--Larry McGee, 7, his sister Janet, 6, and Steven Cross [3], in low log. "I took good care of them, Larry boasted. "Once I heard some one yelling, but I didn't answer because I thought they were big gorillas. "Gee, I'm hungry. When I get home I am going to eat and eat' State Police Chief Joe Roach radloed stated that none of the three suffered any ill effects from tbe 45 degrees night temperature. They were clad only In T-shirts and blue jeans when they wandered away yesterday from a family picnic. The youngsters first were sighted in Box Canyon--about 3 1/2 miles from the spot where they disappeared--by three airmen from Kirtland base at Albuquerque. First radio report of their being found came from Tom Gardner Santa Fe radio repairman "They're all all right," he reported. "Not scared or crying. But they sure are hungry, tired an thirsty."
http://www.newspapers.com/newspage/20741509/
Why would the kids be afraid to yell out to searchers unless they had been frightened by something that looked like "big gorillas"? What type of "big gorillas" would be in the mountains of Northern New Mexico?
-
Children found scratched up and disoriented, many miles away - Missing-411 books
Bobby Ford treated at a hospital for scratches and shock - The Legend Of Boggy Creek
-
The Legend of Boggy Creek is a 1972 horror docudrama about the "Fouke Monster," a Bigfoot-type creature that has been seen in and around Fouke, Arkansas since the 1950s.
The film, which claims to be a true story,
In another scene, hunters attempt to pursue the creature with dogs, but the dogs refuse to give chase.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Legend_of_Boggy_Creek
The Fouke Monster, also known as the Southern Sasquatch, is a legendary cryptid reported near the town of Fouke in Miller County, Arkansas, during the early 1970s.
Although most cases date from the early 1970s onwards, Fouke residents claim that an ape-like creature had roamed the area since 1964,[6] but those sightings had not been reported to news services. Local legend also holds that the creature can be further traced back to sightings in 1946.[7] Most early sightings were in the region of Jonesville. Owing to this, the creature was known as the "Jonesville Monster" during this period.[8][9]
According to Elizabeth Ford,  reached through a screen window while she was sleeping on a couch. It was chased away by her husband and his brother Don, who were returning from a hunting trip. The creature returned shortly after midnight (Sunday, May 2), when it was reported to have grabbed Bobby Ford across the shoulders as he stood on the porch, throwing him to the ground. Bobby managed to crawl free from the creature and was later treated at St. Michael Hospital in Texarkana, Texas, for scratches across his back.[12] He was suffering from mild shock when he arrived.[13]
Several attempts were made to track the creature with dogs, but they were unable to follow its scent.[12].
Jump up ^ Green, John Willison (1978). Sasquatch: The Apes Among Us (1st ed.). Saanichton, B.C.; Seattle, WA: Hancock House. ISBN 978-0-888-39018-9.
^ Jump up to: a b Ogilvie, Craig (2002-10-08). "Legendary Arkansas Monsters Have Deep Roots in History". Arkansas Department of Parks and Tourism. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2006-10-01.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Powell, Jim (2001-06-24). "The Fouke Monster: A look at how the media recorded the reports of the 1971 alleged sighting of a large creature in rural Miller County, Ark.". Texarkana Gazette. Archived from the original on 2003-08-03. Retrieved 2006-10-01.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fouke_Monster
----
Bigfoot ...often seen near and around bodies of fresh water; streams, lakes and rivers.
http://www.bigfootencounters.com/sightings.htm
"he always travels the creeks" - The Legend of Boggy Creek
"through the valleys and the banks of rivers, for it is here that..asu...dwell" - Oahspe
-
OAHSPE: Book of Wars Against Jehovih CHAPTER XXI:
7. ..the brown burrowers in the ground, with long [flat] noses and projecting mouths, very strong, whose grip of the hand could break a horse's leg. The brown people, though harmless, were naked, living mostly on fish and worms and bugs and roots; and they inhabited the regions of the great river, Tua.
-
"There are many different types of Sasquatch, for instance there is a type that burrows into the ground like a giant rodent. “Zoobey” is a bigfoot that lives around Rockglen Saskatchewan… I believe he lives in the ground. It’s been told the entrance to his burrow about 2.5 – 3 feet around. I hope some day they find one of these burrowing Bigfoots."
http://bigfootresearchuk.com/bigfootresearchworld/sasquatch-dna-video-evidence
-
"I am highly convinced that if bigfoot is real, they live in underground civilizations. I feel this is the only way a species such as it could survive or avoid capture."
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread317957/pg5
--
Book of Sethantes, Son of Jehovih: Chapter X:
3. The Lord said: On our journey let us run through the valleys and the banks of rivers, for it is here that both asu and men dwell. And so they journeyed, surveying the earth as they sailed above. The country was mostly barren, not supporting man nor beast.
4. But by the river sides man dwelt, burrowing in the ground to avoid the heat by day and the cold by night.
OAHSPE: First Book of the First Lords Chapter 1:
23. The I'hins shall labor and clothe themselves, and I will abide with them; but the druks shall wander in the wilderness, neither laboring nor clothing themselves.
CHAPTER II:
5. Now, because the druks had not previously obeyed the Lord, but went and dwelt with the asu'ans, there was a half-breed race born on the earth, called Yak, signifying ground people; and they burrowed in the ground like beasts of the forest. And the Yaks did not walk wholly upright, but also went on all fours.
7. And the arms of the Yaks were long, and their backs were stooped and curved.
-
In the 1889 Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society, one L. H. Ransome recounts the time ten years before when a wild man was captured near the northeastern town of Maroantsetra:
We were informed by a trader from Mauritius, a Mr. Carmes, who saw him, that ... [he] was caught by some Malagasy in the employ of a Manahar trader, while asleep on the branch of a tree, and when taken resisted violently, biting his captors severely; after a few days' confinement, however, he ceased to be aggressive. Mr. Carmes describes him as being a powerfully built man of about five feet nine inches in height, his face and body being thickly covered with long black hair; his mode of walking was peculiar, as he traveled very fast, with his head down, occasionally going on all-fours, his eyes (which resembled in expression those of an animal rather than of a human being) invariably being fixed on the ground. When caught he was perfectly nude, but wore clothes when provided with them. He could never be induced to eat flesh or any kind of cooked food, subsisting entirely on manioc and other roots; nor would he sleep in a recumbent position, but when resting preferred to squat on hands and feet on a stool in a corner of the house. After some weeks he commenced to learn a few words, and by means of these and signs it was understood that he had a father and two brothers in the forest where he was taken. These were found and surrounded by a search party one night, but being disturbed, easily eluded their pursuers, jumping from tree to tree like monkeys and running on all-fours. The captured man died five months after being taken.
NOVA Online | The Wilds of Madagascar
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/madagascar/surviving/legends2.html

<--Asu picking wild berries from trees and bushes

map_of_Homo-erectus_range.gif

Some Homo erectus were able to move into the seasonally cold temperate zones of Asia and Europe.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo/homo_2.htm
Homo erectus lived in warm and cold climates as north as 40 degrees latitude near the Chinese Korean border which is equivalent to Northern California and Ohio in the United States.
Homo erectus close relatives (Homo Ergaster) reached 50 degrees latitude in Europe at the France/Belgium border which is equivalent to the Pacific Northwest area of Vancouver Canada/Washington State border.
These northern latitude areas of 40 to 50 degrees are where modern Bigfoot/Sasquatch sightings occur.
-
Meganthropus - Homo erectus palaeojavanicus
As of 2005, the taxonomy and phylogeny for the specimens are still uncertain, although most paleoanthropologists consider them related to Homo erectus in some way. However, the names Homo palaeojavanicus and even Australopithecus palaeojavanicus are sometimes used as well, indicating the classification uncertainty.
The majority of paleoanthropologists believe that Meganthropus is related to H. erectus, but it is not agreed upon how closely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meganthropus
Some scientists claim that Meganthropus was 2/3 the size of Gigantopithecus. This would put the hominid at slightly over 8 feet and at least 500 pounds.
Meganthropus; these creatures had bone densities several times thicker than ours
, and presumeably had muscle mass more like that of an ape than a human. Extreme muscle mass would be absolutely necessary in order to support the bulky skeleton.
One of the most interesting things that the fossil record reveals is that we went through a period of extreme giantism. These were people routinely over 7ft tall, they were huge.  This was before we turned into the modern humans of today.
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/interviews/interview/833/

By The late Dr. Carleton S. Coon
Professor Stephen I Rosen of the University of Maryland has identified its hair as that of a previously unknown primate--and he has hair on file for most of the living primates of the world. He has given me permission to state that its scale pattern is primate, its pigment dense and black like that of a lowland gorilla, and its internal structure "unusual." This last refers to the medulla of the hair strand, which is quite variable among the living races of man.
On this substantially impeccable evidence we may be justified to state that a primate other than man, which is either a pongid (ape), or hominid (kind of man) is alive in Washington, even if the hairs did not come off the animal identified as the creator of the local disturbance.
Coon became a member of the National Academy of Science in 1952 and served as president of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists in 1961- 1962. He passed away in 1981.
http://www.bigfootencounters.com/articles/coon.htm
-
Was the Patterson-Gimlin film ever proven to be a hoax?
http://www.bfro.net/news/korff_scam.asp
-
MK.Davis discusses the value of the Patterson film .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QujK8909MM
-
M.K.Davis discusses the neck and shoulder movement of the Patterson
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvwqR3umYcA
-
M.K.Davis looks at the posterior of the Patterson subject.mp4 .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lB7s3YzTFg
-
M.K.Davis discusses a possible second Sasquatch in the Patterson
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX6HD9Cgj-0
-
M.K.Davis discusses the authenticity of the Patterson Sasquatch film
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmCo7mfr_OM
-
M.K.Davis discusses the use of false color to enhance an image Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXx8kJdsV8E
-
M K Davis discusses the use of false color to enhance an image Part 2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y08otyAxkA4
-
M.K.Davis looks at the thumb motion on the Patterson film subject.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-WfwhfSISw
-
M.K.Davis Discusses a Mysterious Object in the Patterson Bigfoot Film.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=161&v=tGPcqbsLkiU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=21&v=CqR-fkwpDFM
-
Blevins best proof of Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot is real .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH8n_w_U9UU
-
Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Film- Bill Munns Analysis .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex1Zs

Patty: An Exploration of the Sasquatch Seen in the Patterson/Gimlin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awcyw1AwaXg
-
You want proof its real? In 1968 20th Century Fox released the first Planet of the Apes. 20th Century Fox wasnt exactly a 2nd rate studio at the time and Charlton Heston and Roddy McDowell weren't exactly B film actors. In other words this was a BIG BUDGET film. And NOT IN ONE SCENE did they produce a costume that even comes CLOSE to what we saw in the PGfilm, not even close! In 2001 Fox REMADE the film and didnt have a costume that was as good as the 1967 PG film. The PG film is as good as it gets.
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2011/11/breakdown-of-patterson-gimlin-footage.html

Bigfoot-Patterson-Homo-Erectus.gif

Above reconstructed face of early fossil man Homo erectus (Pithecanthropus erectus) looking very Yak-like superimposed over the face of the Patterson Bigfoot, showing a striking similarity.
http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/
The scientific name Pithecanthropus erectus, a name derived from Greek and Latin roots meaning upright ape-man.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Man
Pithecanthropus erectus - former genus of primitive apelike men now Homo erectus
hominid - a primate of the family Hominidae

Notice in the Stacy Brown FLIR still frame of the figure and close-up of the head (at the :59 to 1:08 mark of the video above) you can see the spine of the humanoid creature connects with the skull at the back, holding the head at an angle same as with the Yak of Oahspe and the fossills of Australopithecus or Homo erectus. This is different from a modern human (Homo sapiens) where the spine connects with the skull underneath and near the center, holding the head firmly upright.

Bobo-Brown-Bigfoot-reenactment.jpg

Finding Bigfoot episode had a side by side comparison with Bobo (James "BoBo" Fay above) who is close to NFL Lineman size to the humanoid shape in the Brown thermal video. Bobo is 6 feet 4 inches tall. The creature was clearly much taller than Bobo when behind the tree and out in the open it made Bobo look like a twig. The creature covered the same distance from tree to cover in one natural step. It took Bobo two very exaggerated and clumsy steps to cover same distance.

At Facebook.com/findbigfoot we believe that Bigfoot (Sasquatch) has been caught watching kids, ATVs, campfires in a backyard adjoining a forest or a wooded river. Habituation and observation of rural humans and their children is part of a great number of the sighting record.
http://www.facebook.com/notes/bigfoot/-top-68-sasquatch-videosfilms-of-all-time-plus-unrated-yet-to-be-seen-videos-and/128848930465096
-
Review of Tribal Bigfoot
This is the best book I have read concerning Bigfoot sightings and information. So professional and so well written...I could not put it down...
http://www.amazon.com/Tribal-Bigfoot-David-Paulides/dp/0888396872
-
Yellowstone National Park (Arapaho: Henihco'oo or Héetíhco'oo)[4] is a national park located primarily in the U.S. state of Wyoming, although it also extends into Montana and Idaho.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_National_Park
-
Oahspe God's First Book: Chapter XXIV:12. named Arapanseekasoodativhatapanagooshhootlabanasee [Arapa-seekasoodativhatapanagooshhootlabanasee, ancestor of Arapa-ho and Algonquin tribes. The Arapa-- tribes took their name from Arapanseekasoodativhatapanagooshhootlabanasee just as Shoshone tribes took their name from Shoshone.
Oahspe God's First Book: Chapter XXIV:15. And these took the name of the tribe of Ara, the which name survived one thousand seven hundred and fifty years. And their people were tens of thousands. [The Arapa-- tribes took their name from Ara].
The greater Yellowstone region, which surrounds the national park, is home to the Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho tribes who reside on the Wind River Indian Reservation.
http://getawaytips.azcentral.com/yellowstone-native-american-festivals-5015.html
-
There is an unknown predator in our forests.
Children camping with their parents in Yosemite, Yellowstone, and a dozen of other parks throughout the USA and Canada, disappeared suddenly in one minute of distraction of their guardians, as if a predator was watching from the cover of the trees, choosing his time. Hundred of volunteers searching the woods, with park authorities, canine teams, even army personnel and FBI investigators, were often late in finding the child far from the place of disappearance, his clothes turned out, shoes missing, sometimes naked in the cold forest, or up the mountain, or in a creek bed.
http://www.amazon.com/Missing-411-Western-United-States-Canada/dp/1466216298
-
Oahspe First Book of God chapter XXV:
16. In the High North lay the kingdom of Olegalla, the land of giants, the place of yellow rocks and high spouting waters (geysers). It was Olegalla who gave away his kingdom, the great city of Powafuchawowitchahavagganeabba, with the twenty-four tributary cities spread along the valley of Anemoosagoochakakfuela [Yellowstone Valley --Ed.].
"land of giants", "the place of yellow rocks and high spouting waters (geysers)", "along the valley of Anemoosagoochakakfuela [Yellowstone Valley --Ed.]"
Here Oahspe speaks of (human) giants in the Yellowstone National Park area (thousands of years ago, are they still around?). Are the "giants" of Yellowstone that Oahspe spoke of Bigfoots (Sasquatch)?
-
Sas·quatch: a large, hairy creature that walks on two feet like a man and that some people claim to have seen in the northwestern U.S. and western Canada.
Definition of SASQUATCH: a hairy creature like a human being reported to exist in the northwestern United States and western Canada and said to be a primate between 6 and 15 feet (1.8 and 4.6 meters) tallcalled also bigfoot.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sasquatch

yellowstone-national-park-map.jpg
Yellowstone-National-Park-Wyoming.jpg
Bigfoot-wyhotspot_redbox.jpg

The Wyoming Location  
The BFRO has identified a location to recommend to all amateur and professional videographers. The location is along the road from Cody, Wyoming to Yellowstone National Park.
An individual report location listed in database indicates where one or more bigfoots were sighted or heard at one time in the past. Patterns of reports can indicate where bigfoots might be seen in the future. The location recommended here is one where a bigfoot is very likely to be seen again in the future, due to a pattern of past reports.
The two-part criteria for this recommendation is:
1) The location has a pattern of credible reports suggesting future daylight opportunities for footage, where
2) Several photographers would be able to seek footage simultaneously without disturbing or detering the bigfoot(s).
http://www.bfro.net/wy_hot_spot.htm
Notice the maps above, the Wyoming Bigfoot hot spot (red box) is right next to the (big) Yellowstone Lake in Yellowstone National Park. Also the Misssing 411 Wyoming cluster of unexplained missing people (map below) is in the same area as Yellowstone National Park and Yellowstone Lake, which is the same area as the Bigfoot hot spot (for sightings) and is the same as the land of giants in Oahspe First Book of God chapter XXV:16. Is it a coincidence that all this information lines up to the same area? The Missing 411 Wyoming cluster happened from the years 1942 to 1997, 61 to 116 years AFTER Oahspe was typed.  Yellowstone, Wyoming Bigfoot cluster sightings are documented from the years 1976 - 2002,  95 to 121 years after Oahspe.

Wyoming-Missing-411-clusters.jpg
Dennis-Johnson-Yellowstone.jpg
Bigfoot-shelters-lean-to.jpg

-
Any comments about Oahspe or this website? Email Me. I look forward to talking to you about Oahspe and this website
-
"I am glad for anyone who is appreciative of my website and puts a value on my hard work, thank you."
 

If you find this information helpful to you please feel free to make a $20 dollar donation and help support my research.  Thank You.

If you want to donate more than $20 enter the amount here. Thank you for supporting my work.

With a $20 or more donation I am also avaliable for a 30 minute phone consultation where I will answer questions you may have. Email me or leave a comment if you want a phone consultation.

Enter supporting content here