Home, Cycles, AstrophysicsMore science, Astronomy, PhysicsMore science 2 Chemistry, Physics, AstronomyHigher Advanced Knowledge of OahspeOptical Network Communications - Facial recognitionWeather, Climate, Dark Matter, Airborne PathogensExtrasolar planets, CEVORKUM, Light speedGeology - Pole-shift - Radiometric datingSolar-Stellar Life Cycle - End of Earth - DeathBiology, Primary Vortex, Life, Computing, QuantumPhysics - Light - SoundPhysics - Magnetism - GravityThe Creator - The Father- and ManHuman origins - Pygmies - I'hinsHominidae - animal-manEarly Man - Races of Man - AnthropologyDinosaurs, Man, fossils, early EarthReligious History, Chinvat Bridge, Archeology, RaceConfucius, Po, China, Jaffeth & CaucasiansThe Great Pyramid of Ancient EgyptHell, Knots, Flash devices, Riot controlBiblical flood and the sinking of PanLooeamong, Constantine, and The Roman EmpireThe Bible, Jesus, Joshu and the EssenesColumbus, Catholics, Conquistadors, Protestants, CrusadesQuakers and inner lightThomas PaineUS HistoryKosmon cycle, people, ancestry & SHALAMSubatomic particles - String Theory - Quantum - GUTMatter - Anti-Matter, Galaxies and CosmologyWalter Russell Cosmogony and EinsteinAerospace engineering, space-ships, space travelSpace clouds, Earth travel, ORACHNEBUAHGALAHTables of prophecy and historyThe BeastORACHNEBUAHGALAH CHARTS & Day Night CyclesAngels, universe, genetics, Loo'isPower of Attraction - Visualization - Spiritual giftsSpiritual message - UFOs - EthereansCosmic Consciousness, cycles, human behaviorCycles, Predictions, Earth events, A'jiNebula, Earth's atmosphere, heat & cold, eclipse, prophecyTrue PropheciesPredictionsDirect Inspiration, Walter RussellMisc. vortex, matter, periodic table, solar system, fractals, pi and cMisc. 2, E=mc2, geometry, pi and alphabet codes, chemical elementsMisc. 3, Sacred mathematics, geometry, music, harmonics, cosmology, cyclesMisc. 4 life and planets, E-O-IH and geometry, DNA, facial recognitionMisc. 5 human DNA, neuroscience, 9-8-5, 33, creativity, solar powerProphecy, Pan, Harvest & DNAMagnetospheres - Solar planetary vortex - 3D HologramsEther Vortex PhysicsLanguage - Symbols - Pictographs - Creator's nameTornados, name vs concept, flat earth theory, UV-light, sympathetic resonance, drujasTae and facial recognition, Ham, Shem, Guatama, I'huan, Ghan racesOriginal Israelites and JewsMathematics, Reality, primary 3, E-O-IH, Cevorkum, EthereansAngelic star travelers, Human origins, racesVisitors and CommentsDonation

12..Science is great; great learning is great; truth is great; but a greater than all is to know how to be happy. You shall not put me away saying: All the earth is sin. || I will not have it. For if you do not benefit in Jehovih's Person (that which is seen), how can you attain His Spirit (that which is unseen)? For are the two: His Person and His Spirit, not the All One?
13. Teach yourself to be happy; and to perfect yourself in the way Jehovih has created you.
- Oahspe Book Of Knowledge Part 2

OAHSPE GOD'S BOOK OF BEN CHAPTER VII:
3. I am the living mathematics;

"Not many people have the patience and scholarship to read Oahspe" - John Keel
https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/SarfattiScienceSeminars/conversations/messages/3914

The Key to understanding anything you read is to take it one word and one sentence at a time. If you come to a word you don't understand then research the word until you understand it, then go back and re-read the sentence again.
I have made the word research easier for you by providing definitions for many strange words in Oahspe and on my website.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The immediate ancestors of humans were members of the genus Australopithecus click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced.  The australopithecines click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced (or australopiths) were intermediate between apes and people.  Both australopithecines and humans are biologically similar enough to be classified as members of the same biological tribe--the Hominini click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced.  All people, past and present, along with the australopithecines are hominins click this icon to hear the preceding term pronounced ...http://anthro.palomar.edu/hominid/australo_1.htm

Below images of Races of Man (Asu-Yak-Druk-I'hin-I'huan-Ghan-Kosmon) from Oahspe. Source: page 162 of SEVEN YEARS THAT CHANGED THE WORLD 1941-1948 (1940) by Wing Anderson.

Oahspe Races of Man Asu Yak Druk Ihin Ihuan Ghan
uploading images

Pendulum-of-races.jpg

Above drawing of the Pendulum of Corporeal Human Races shows human evolution by cross breeding (mixing) until the divine goal is reached in the Kosmon race which is balanced, strong, and grown up physically and spiritually. Each succeeding swing of the pendulum is one step closer to the goal and one swing nearer to balance. Each pendulum swing represents a race of man named in Oahspe and a step in human evolution. Ghan includes Listians, and Asu and Druk includes Yaks. Pendulum swings: 1st = extremely physical, lacking spiritual. 2nd = extremely spiritual, lacking physical. 7th = not lacking in physical or spiritual developement.  7 represents completion or peak, the 7th era at hand.  The middle or center represents balance between two opposites. The whole universe is constantly seeking balance between two opposites. Balance is the one word of the Universal Law of Creator God. Asu-man had to be created first because man was created different from any other species or animal. Asu man was created without a pre-program or instinct, at zero, and therefore had no (zero, 0.0) ability (genes) for spiritual understanding. If Asu would have had the genes for spiritual understanding then that would have been a pre-program or instinct like the animals. So the genetic ability for spiritual understanding had to be added to man by cross breeding with the angels who had it, thus came the second race of man the I'hins. But the I'hins were lacking physically (which they inherited from their angel parents who had died in infancy on other physical planets). So the I'hins not being the perfection (completion, balance) of humankind had to cross breed with the Asuans to gain more physical ability. Although the Druks were physically larger and stronger than the I'hins, they still had too much beast (Asu) blood (genetics) in them (more than 66.6 %), and too little angel blood in them (less than 33.3 %) so the druks had to cross breed (mix) with the I'hins to produce the I'huan, the first race that was physically large and strong, and had spiritual ability. Another swing of the pendulum and one swing nearer to balance and completion. Even with the racial mixing the I'hins were commanded to keep seperate and not breed with the other races, this was because it was important to keep them seperate and "pure" to be used as a breeding stock for spiritual genetics (ability), so racial seperation and race mixing was all part of the divine plan. The dividing line between mixed Druk and Mongrel is somewhere between half Druk-half I'huan, and half Druk-half Ghan.

Above  Pendulum of corporeal human races faces. Left colum from top to botom = Asu, Druk, Mongrel. Right column from top to bottom = I'hin, I'huan, Ghan. In the center at botom = Kosmon amalgamated race.

Oahspe Book of Osiris, Son of Jehovih: Chapter XII:
8. On all corporeal worlds, Jehovih hath provided these two seasons for every race He created; a season for the development of the corporeal senses, and a season for the development of the spiritual senses. To find the mean between these is to find kosmon,
The mean is the average of the numbers: a calculated "central" value of a set of numbers.
http://www.mathsisfun.com/definitions/mean.html
-
OAHSPE: The Lords' Fifth Book CHAPTER I:
21. And as to the newborn people, they shall become the mightiest of all people in the whole world, because they came out of both darkness and light. The darkness in them shall battle all darkness; the light that is in them shall then master over their own darkness.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each race first appeared on earth according to Oahspe:
Asu - 78,000 years before Kosmon.
I'hin - 72,000 years before Kosmon.
Druk - 71,000 years before Kosmon.
I'huan - 70,000 years before Kosmon.
Ghan - 14,000 years before Kosmon.
Mongrel - 8,000 years before Kosmon.
Kosmon - about 100 years after Kosmon.
Above from pages 160-161 of SEVEN YEARS THAT CHANGED THE WORLD, 1941-1948 (1940) by Wing Anderson.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Kosmon-balance-between-Evolution-Creation.jpg

^-- Removing OAHSPE's Enigma By Jim Dennon

Pithecanthropus erectus and Asu Adam Oahspe Draw
image hosting over 10mb

Ardipithecus Ramidus face Asu Adam face Oahspe
img host

Above top: facial drawing of Pithecanthropus erectus compared to facial drawing of Asu the first man of earth in Oahspe drawn by John Ballou Newbrough. Notice the similarities in neck, facial-head shape-features and hair.
Above below: facial drawing of Ardipithecus ramidus compared to facial drawing of Asu the first man of earth in Oahspe drawn by John Ballou Newbrough. Notice the similarities in neck, facial-head shape-features and hair. Asu had a human (Homo or erectus) type nose, not an ape-like nose that Ardipithecus was drawn with. Erectus fossil was discovered in 1891 ten (10) years after Oahspe on the island of Java (Indonesia) very close to where the continent of Pan was. Ardipithecus ramidus fossil was discovered in 2009 (128) years after Oahspe in eastern Africa (Ethiopia). One of the big difference between Oahspe and other spiritual books (like the Bible) is the drawings. Oahspe has a drawing of Asu (Adam) that fits the fossil record (evidence). Asu is the roots of earth man's aggression and beast war-like behavior (numbered .666 or 2/3) that is seen in Chimpanzees:

Some people looking like animals-Apes. Protruding mouths, shape of head, like Australopithecus, Homo erectus, and Neanderthal.
The fossil record which is physical evidence, forensics, anthropology. The fossil record is physical forensic evidence of animal-like (ape-like) people who lived in the past. The answer from Bible believing people about fossils of Homo-erectus and Neanderthal is that they are deformed humans. Deformity is rare like a mutation. When something is the majority it is not a deformity. There was a time when the majority of people looked animal or ape-like according to the fossil physical evidence. The Bible does not explain the animal nature and physical features of early man.
The Bible does not account for the origins of man and the fossil record. All humans today have at least 50% to 60% animal-man DNA in them.
The 1st (race) of man was 100% animal-man, the 2nd (race) of man was 50% animal-man. The 3rd (race) of man was 75% animal-man. The 4th (race) of man was 62.5% animal-man. Notice how the shape of the head of the Yak below (far right) in Oahspe resembles the skull of Homo erectus (fossil record).
Homo Erectus Homo sapiens 

 
"Then he told me that the garden of Eden where Adam and Eve lived was found to be in Ethiopia, "same place where Lucy was found"... (Oh my) So I asked him if he knew what Lucy looks like and he said "No". I sent him across the street to the National History Museum to see the replica of Lucy's skeleton. He then said that, according to this brilliant neuroscientist that is famous around the world and is running for President (Ben Carson), the fossils that have been found are actually fossils of regular humans with deformities.
In short, these people are absolutely ignorant and deniers of Science. I put him against the wall with arguments, and he was really nervous so I let him go."
http://www.andywhiteanthropology.com/blog/oahspe-when-matings-with-angels-dont-produce-giants

 ASU, THE FIRST MAN (Ardipithecus ramidus the first hominid).
Notice the long arms and short legs of Asu (Adam) that resemble a Gibbon or Orangutan, this is very similar to the fossils of Ardipithecus ramidus.
Asu was not an ape, and was not fully man.
Asu (Ardipithecus) was quadrupedal and arboreal with longer arms relative to their leg length.
I'hins (Genus Homo) were bipedal with shorter arms than legs.
https://www.google.com/#q=genus+Homo
Neoteny in humans is the slowing or delaying of body development, compared to non-human primates, resulting in features such as a large head, a flat face, and relatively short arms and legs.
Neoteny of the human body is indicated by glabrousness (hairless body).
[5]  Neoteny in humans is further indicated by the limbs and body posture, with the limbs proportionately short compared to torso length;[4] longer leg than arm length;[8]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny_in_humans
The I'hins had all the highlighted features above and Asu did not. The I'hins had neoteny features because of the infancy DNA that was passed down from their angelic parents who had died in infancy on other corporeal worlds.
Ardipithecus ramidus was a fruit-eater (see drawing below by John Ballu Newbrough in Oahspe).
Above left: Asu-man reaching for berries in tree. right: edible berries in tree.
a berry is a small, pulpy and often edible fruit.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Berry
Above drawing of Ardipithecus ramidus the first hominin fossil face to face with drawing of Asu the first race of man in Oahspe.
Above Orthographic projection of Ardipithecus face to Asu face showing similarities in facial design and proportions.
Orthographic projection uses parallel lines to compare the shapes of two things. Ardipithecus and Asu chins align, lips align, eyes align, brow ridges align, and slopes of foreheads align.
Above forensic reconstruction drawing of Ardipithecus ramidus and Asu drawing in Oahspe by John Ballou Newbrough
both showing 45 degree slope of forehead using Isosceles Triangle (90, 45, 45).
-
Ardipithecus ramidus - reconstruction - by Ray Matternes or Jay Matternes
https://www.google.com/#q=Ardipithecus+ramidus+-+reconstruction+-+by+Ray+Matternes+or+Jay+Matternes
Ardipithecus ramidus "artist Jay Matternes put flesh and fur on the creature's bones" © 2009, Jay Matternes
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/326/5960
"This is the oldest hominid skeleton on Earth," said Tim White, University of California, Berkeley, professor of integrative biology and one of the co-directors of the Middle Awash Project, a team of 70 scientists that reconstructed the skeleton and other fossils found with it.
...the first hominid to arise after the hominid line that would eventually lead to humans ...
"Ardi was not a chimpanzee, but she wasn't human," stressed White, who directs UC Berkeley's Human Evolution Research Center. "When climbing on all fours, she did not walk on her knuckles, like a chimp or gorilla, but on her palms. No ape today walks on its palms."
White said Ardi, who probably weighed about 110 pounds, had a brain close to the size of today's chimpanzees — one-fifth that of Homo sapiens — and a small face.
http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2009/10/01_ardiskeleton.shtml

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. ramidus was named in September 1994. The first fossil found was dated to 4.4 million years ago on the basis of its stratigraphic position between two volcanic strata: the basal Gaala Tuff Complex(G.A.T.C.) and the Daam Aatu Basaltic Tuff (D.A.B.T.).[5]
-
Fossils are not dated directly, they are dated indirectly, they date the rocks, not the bones. Is it possible the rocks
are much older than the bones? If a human dies, is it probable that the rocks near his body are much older than his bones?
http://naturalhistory.si.edu/exhibits/backyard-dinosaurs/questions-answers.cfm?know=a24
Carbon-14 decays with a halflife of about 5730 years by the emission of an electron of energy 0.016 MeV. 
The low activity of the carbon-14 limits age determinations to the order of 50,000 years by counting techniques. That can be extended to perhaps 100,000 years by accelerator techniques for counting the carbon-14 concentration.
"Dating by radioactive carbon has a similar uncertainty" [as lists of Egyptian kings and lengths of reigns].
- page 52 of The Golden Ratio: The Story of Phi, the World's Most Astonishing Number (2002). by Mario Livio.
Mario Livio is an Israeli-American astrophysicist and an author of works that popularize science and mathematics.
From 1991 till 2015 he was an astrophysicist at the Space Telescope Science Institute,
which operates the Hubble Space Telescope. Wikipedia
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Early or Primitive man
1. Asu = Adam 100% of the Earth, 0% of Heaven. = Ardipithecus ramidus - Australipithecus
2. I'hin = Abel 50% Asu, 50% heaven = Homo floresiensis *
* Homo florsiensis is mixed with Homo erectus, but in phenotype I consider him I'hin just as an African-american is considered black even when mixed with caucasion or american indian. I'hin was not a "pure" race anyway, the only pure race was A'su the first, all the others are mixed.
3. Original and early Druks:(Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo ergaster)
A. The original Druks = Cain 75% Asu, 25% heaven
B. Early Druk mixture (1/2 mix) = half Ihuan/half Druk = 68.75 Asu, 31.25% heaven
The original and early druks were not capable of everlasting life geneticly.
4. Yak = tallest 87.5% Asu, 12.5% heaven = Sasquatch, Bigfoot
-
Other excellent Oahspe scholars have said the druks were Homo neaderthalis also:
Augustine Cahill, author of DARKNESS, DAWN, AND DESTINTY (DRAWN FROM OAHSPE) 1965.
Ruth and Vernon, the experts who put together THE OAHSPE STANDARD EDITION!
http://oahspestandardedition.com/OSAC/AncientRacesofMan.html
Susan Martinez, Ph.D.(Anthropology) has the original Druks being Homo erectus and the latter Druks being Homo neanderthals, a half druk/half I'huan cross. Page 307 fig. 9.4 Family Tree of Man, THE LOST HISTORY of the Little People, 2013
_________________________
Modern Man
5. I'huan = 62.5% Asu, 37.5% heaven
= Homo sapiens sapiens Cromagnon (modern man)
6. Listian-Ghan = 56.25% Asu, 43.75% heaven = Modern man
7. Kosmon = mixture of all the modern races of man = Cosmic man
Druk = cross between Asu and Ihin
Yak = cross betweem Asu and Druk
I'huan = cross between Druk and I'hin
Listian - Ghan = cross between I'huan and I'hin
Kosmon = cross between different Listians, Ghans, I'huans, and Mongrels
---------------------------
Latter Druks (Homo neanderthalis):
3C. The latter Druks (1/4 mix) = 3/4 I'huan/1/4 Druk = 65.62 Asu, 34.38% heaven *
The latter Druk (1/4 mix) was capable of eternal life in heaven because they had less
than 66.6 % Asu, and more than 33.3 % heaven, above the genetic threshold for everlasting life.
An analogy to the above is the fact that in America for centuries people were still considered black who had only 1/4 black ancestry.
-
Other mixed races of modern man:
Origin of the short negritos (Ghan-Druk-I'hin mix):
Oahspe Book of Divinity: Chapter XI:
18. And it came to pass that a fourth race rose up in the world, and it was mongrel, being dark and short and less noble. The I'huans were red, and brown, and tall, and majestic; the I'hins small, and white, and yellow. And Jehovih put these marks upon His peoples that the races might be read in thousands of years.
-
African Pygmies = 4/5 I'hin + 1/5 I'huan = 52.5% Asu + 47.5% angelic.
Mongrels (Negritoes-Australoids) = 1/2 I'hin + 1/4 Ghan + 1/4 Druk = 57.8125% Asu, 42.1875% angelic.
Below Betaface facial recognition and race classification of negrito Mongrels:

Betaface | Advanced face recognition
race - asian-middle-eastern, asian, african-american (black), hispanic (european), white, middle eastern, other
https://www.betafaceapi.com/wpa/index.php/documentation

-
Octave of corporean races:
1. Kosmon
2. Ghans-Listians
3. I'huan
4. I'hin
5. Mongrel
-------------------------------2/3 mark or threshold (.666)
6. Druk
7. Yak
8. Asu
5/8 of the races are above the mark of the Beast, those 5 have beauty, symmetry of features.
8 / 5 = 1.6 (PHI) the Golden Ratio, Divine Ratio, harmony of the God Apollo (the cycle of the Orian Cheif Apollo).
Golden Ratio proportions of the human body 
The following sections of the modern human body are all in phi proportion:
finger tip to elbow…wrist to elbow
shoulder line/top of head… head length
navel/top of head… shoulder line/top of head
navel to knee… knee to end of foot.
The beauties and harmonies of Nature are an expression of the All-Person, Jehovih. 3/8 of the races are below the mark of the Beast, those 3 races had bent backs, low foreheads, receeding chins, hanging jaws, disproportionate long arms, clawlike long sharp curved fingernails.
-
8 corporeal races mentioned in Oahspe, 5 have symmetry of features, 3 don't = 3, 5, and 8 are fibonacci numbers, 8 divided by 5 = 1.6 = golden ratio of symmetry, beauty.
-
Oahspe Book of Sapah, OSIRIS, 58
Since the submersion of Pan to the present cycle of Kosmon, there have been 8 cycles to get to the Kosmon race (the 8th race)
After the cycle of Apollo most of mankind achieved symmetry, harmony of features. 5 of the 8 cycles were after the cycle of Apollo.
1. Aph = 25000 years before Kosmon
2. Sue = 21400 years before Kosmon
3. Apollo, the 1st = 18200 years B.K
--------------Symmetry, beauty, harmony = 8/5 cycles = 1.6 Golden ratio
4. Thor, the 1st = 15400 years B.K.
5. Osiris, the 1st = 12200 years B.K.
6. Fragapatti = 8900 years before Kosmon
7. Cpenta-Armij = 5800 years before Kosmon
8. Arc of Bon = 3400 years B.K. to Kosmon
--------------Kosmon, present cycle 99.9% symmetry, harmony
-
Percent human's with > 1/3 Angelic Eve blood [everlasting life]
Arc, Cycle, Etherean
1-16, Sethantes-Neph____ 1%  = 79000-24000 years B.K.
17, Aph_________________ 54% = 25000 years before Kosmon
18, Sue_________________ 62% = 21400 years before Kosmon
19, Apollo______________ 72% = 18200 years B.K
20, Thor________________ 85% = 15400 years B.K.
21, Osiris______________ 87% = 12200 years B.K.
22, Fragapatti__________ 90% = 8900 years before Kosmon
23, Cpenta-armij________ 95% = 5800 years before Kosmon
24, Lika,_______________ 99% = 3400 years B.K. to Kosmon
25, Ouranothen__________ 100% [99.99%] = Present Kosmon
http://www.angelfire.com/ia/faithist/page13.jpg
-
Page 87 of DARKNESS, DAWN, AND DESTINY, 1965 by Augustine Cahill says "I have frequently remarked in the course of this study that the I'hins were originally a fair race, descended on the one side however from Adam [Asu], a black race. The pigmentation of subsequent tribes was at first proportional to the degree of I'hin or Adamite blood [genetics], but in course of time various permutations manifested. It may be advisable at this juncture to emphasize that Oahspe clearly and repeatedly states that the day of race or colour discrimination is now past. The I'hins and the Ghans were required to keep their blood pure for spiritual reasons, but today the Adamites [Asu], the cavemen [Druks, Yaks], and the I'hins are all extinct. There is no longer any necessary spiritual virtue in the accident of a fair complexion. The lower caste Hindus [of India] for instance have more I'hin blood in them than many of the white races."
-
The mathematics of human genetics and evolutionary change:
-
Genetic ratios (earthly to spiritual) of races in Oahspe:
Early man:
1. Asu = Adam 100% of the Earth, 0% of Heaven. = 100 / .00001 = 10,000,000 : 1
10,000,000 converted to time = 10 million years split between humans and chimps.
2. I'hin = 50% Asu, 50% angelic = 50 / 50 = 1:1 = complete quantity (not quality)
3. Druks = 75% Asu, 25% angelic = 75 / 25 = 3:1
4. Yak = 87.5% Asu, 12.5% angelic = 87.5 / 12.5 = 7:1
Genetic threshold = 66.66 Beast, 33.33 angelic = 2:1 and above is imbalance
Below 2:1 genetic ratio is everlasting life, golden ratio and balance
Modern man:
5. I'huan = 62.5% Asu, 37.5% angel = 1.66:1 = golden ratio, 5/3 fibonacci numbers.
6. Mongrels = 65.625 Asu, 34.375 angelic = 1.90:1
7. Listian-Ghan = 56.25% Asu, 43.75% angelic = 1.28:1
8. Kosmon = mixture of all the modern races of man = 1.22:1
Everlasting life (spiritual ability) genetics = LESS THAN 66.6 % (a'ji) Asu (beast), and MORE THAN 33.3% (dan) Angel (Heaven) = less than a harmonic multiple (double) genetic ratio.
-
While the genetic difference between individual humans today is minuscule – about 0.1%, on average – study of the same aspects of the chimpanzee genome indicates a difference of about 1.2%. The bonobo (Pan paniscus), which is the close cousin of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), differs from humans to the same degree. The DNA difference with gorillas, another of the African apes, is about 1.6%. Most importantly, chimpanzees, bonobos, and humans all show this same amount of difference from gorillas. A difference of 3.1% distinguishes us and the African apes from the Asian great ape, the orangutan. How do the monkeys stack up?  All of the great apes and humans differ from rhesus monkeys, for example, by about 7% in their DNA.
Geneticists have come up with a variety of ways of calculating the percentages, which give different impressions about how similar chimpanzees and humans are.
Site Last Updated: 2013-12-24
http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics
-
Our closest animal relatives are the great apes: chimpanzees, orangutans and gorillas. About 98% of the DNA in your genes is exactly the same as in chimpanzees, making you as closely related to a chimp as horses are to zebras.
www.sciencemuseum.org.uk › ... › Where did we come from?
-
10,000,000 converted to time = 10 million years split between humans and chimps.
Rather than write a ratio of infinite:1, I gave Asu a measurable genetic progress (change, evolution) equal to 100 / the most number of places, whole numbers and decimal of the other races of man = 5 for Mongrels 65.625, 34.375) = .00001. Which is equivalent to the smallest possible progress or change ability of an Ape-man or Asu. If converted to time 100 / .00001 = 10 million years for Asu to evolve into Homo sapiens sapiens.
This 10,000,000 number matches a DNA study:
DNA study maps human-chimp split - NEW YORK — One of the most detailed comparisons yet of human and chimp DNA shows...
Previous genetic research has shown that chimpanzees and humans are sister species, having split off from a common ancestor about 7 million years ago. The new study goes farther by looking at approximately 800 times more DNA than earlier efforts.
The researchers, from the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, propose that humans and chimpanzees first split up about 10 million years ago.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/genetics/2006-05-17-human-chimp-split_x.htm
Scientists Reset the Molecular Clock For Human Origins
Langergraber’s team estimated the human and chimpanzee lineages split  at least 7 million years ago, but maybe even further back in the timeline, to as much as 13 million years. That’s more than twice as long as initial estimates, which placed the human/chimp split between 4 and 6 million years ago.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/johnfarrell/2012/12/07/scientists-reset-the-molecular-clock-for-human-origins/
-
Mathematical formula for hominid races (sub-species) ancestors of man to evolve (change) into fully modern man (Homo sapiens).
3.33 = threshold for everlasting life (dan, 33)
6.66 = number of the Beast, 666, animal-man
-
Man (Asu) was created at zero (0.00001)
BOOK OF INSPIRATION. CHAPTER XIII:
26. Thyself I gave ...the zero of thy entity
Oahspe SECOND BOOK OF LORDS CHAPTER I:
18. The Lord said: ...man was created blank;
-
For Asuans:
10,000,000 x 1.00 = 10,000,000
10,000,000 x 0.00001 = 100
10,000,000 - 100 = 9,999,900
9,999,900 / 1,000,000 = 9.9999
9.9999 - 3.3333 = 6.666 = 6,666,666 years for Asu to evolve into Homo sapiens
-
For Yaks:
10,000,000 x .875 = 8,750,000
10,000,000 x .125 = 1,250,00
8,750,00 - 1,250,000 = 7,500,000 years
7,500,000 / 1,000,000 = 7.5
7.5 - 3.33 = 4.17 = 4,170,000 years for Yak to evolve into Homo sapiens
-
For Druks:
10,000,000 x .75 = 7,500,000
10,000,000 x .25 = 2,500,000
7,500,000 - 2,500,000 = 5,000,000 years
5,000,000 / 1,000,000 = 5
5.0 - 3.33 = 1.67 = 1,670,000 years for Druk to evolve into Homo sapiens
-
For I'huans:
10,000,000 x .625 = 6,250,000
10,000,000 x .375 = 3,750,000
6,250,000 - 3,750,000 = 2,500,000 years
2,500,000 / 1,000,000 = 2.5
2.5 - 3.33 = negative years for I'huan to evolve into Homo sapiens
-
According to Oahspe the evolution of the ape-man to fully modern man never happened. Asu (Adam) was created and existed only 79,000 years ago and became extinct in 8,000 years and it was the intervention (mixing) of the angel dna that caused and sped up the evolution (progress, change) of man. .00001 is a number that is much too small for any significant change to occur within Asu in one life time, to achieve the smallest number for spiritual understanding and ability (33.3 % genetics).
-
According to Oahspe mankind was half-way in the Eoptian age of man on earth at the time of the great pyramid of Egypt, from the time of the origin of I'hin = 72,000 + 72000 = 144,000 years (Eoptian Age), not enough time for Asu, Yaks, or Druks to evolve into Modern man (I'huans or Ghans). This is probably the case on the other corporeal worlds that have human life, so that in all the universe there is no evolution (except by cross-breeding or mixing) of ape-man to fully modern man. It woud take 1.67 (for Druks) to 6.66 (for Asu) million years or never, and mankind is not on a corporeal world long enough for that to happend before he becomes extinct.
-
OAHSPE: The Lords' Fifth Book Chapter IV:21:
"For I foresaw these times, and provided angels to go in advance, to show, first, the evolution of the races of men from out of the lowest darkness; and, second, that the cause of the evolution came from the Great Spirit, and was directed unto righteousness; but had not been so, but for the Lord, your God."
-
Evolution does not happend from one species to another species, but it does happend from within a species, from one kind of man to another kind of man (not from animal to man). During the cycle of Apollo the physical form of man changed, evolved. The cause of the evolution was the thoughts of the mother manifesting in the body of the children. The cause of the evolution of man is NOT environment, it is the spirit, thought, this is why whites wouldn't turn into blacks, or blacks turn into whites merely by living in a certain country of environment.
OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY V:
12. And all of them propogated after their own kind, and do so to this day. And though the blacks might live for thousands of generations with themselves only, in any country in the world, they would never become whites. And the same rule applieth to whites and browns, and all the races of man.
-
DARKNESS, DAWN AND DESTINY (drawn from Oahspe) by Augustine Cahill, page 82 says "Apollo's task envisaged a physical transformation of the lumbering unlovely Stone Age savage into a handsome, nimble athlete, or a beautifully moulded graceful woman. Apollo's work was the foundation of harmony, symmetry, and music in human life.
How was such a task, which evolutionary theorists would ascribe to the operation of the blind and chance processes of 'natural selection' over countless generations, actually accomplished in a comparatively short period of time--as the prehistoric remains prove that it was?
It was done by angelic control, by the inspiration for instance of pregnant woman, who were caused to DREAM by night of handsome children, and who were obsessed into a passionate desire for beauty in their offspring through the worship of the IMAGES OF APOLLO by day. THE POWER OF THEIR THOUGHT processes then CREATIVELY FORMED the soul of the child in the womb, helping the coming soul to SHAPE the coming body.
Let us not underestimate THE POWER of the mother's THOUGHT..."
-
Oahspe Book of Apollo, Son of Jehovih: Chapter XIV:
1. JEHOVIH spake from the light of the throne of God, saying: Hear the words of your Creator, O ye Counselors of heaven.
3. But My physicians are tired; My nurses are tired; My teachers are tired. Be wise, O My Sons and Daughters. Who hath reformed a beggar by giving to him? What physician preventeth sickness by healing?
4. They bring forth in deformity on the earth, and ye must cure them in heaven. They squat on their haunches on earth, and they squat the same way in heaven, and ye must cure them.
5. Go ye to the root of the matter, O My beloved. Send ye down to the kingdoms of My Lords, and say to them: Thus saith Jehovih: Follow them, O My Lords! Double the number of ashars, double the loo'is; leave no young man alone; leave no young woman alone. Keep over them day and night; give them visions and dreams of Apollo. For I am concerted in heaven and on earth to re-mold the forms of the earth-born.
6. Jehovih said: Hear your Creator, O Gau! Make seven more plateaux for the second resurrection. Out of the idolatry of My Son, Apollo, will I beautify the inhabitants of the earth. And the cast and mold of men and of women shall become a great power.
13. So Jehovih changed the forms of the earth-born; but they became worshippers of Apollo; accrediting to one another Jehovih's perfection in them, according to the form and figure of the flesh. And because of the idolatry of the women for Apollo, their children were born of good flesh, and shapely; so that, in four hundred years, the hair on their heads grew long and straight, and men began to have beards. Neither considered any young man any virtue in a young woman so important as her form; nor did young women value any virtue in man so great as a well-molded form.
14. And when mortals died, and their spirits entered the first resurrection, half the labor of the asaphs, the receiving angels, was accomplished.
-
OAHSPE First Book of the First Lords chapter II: "19. The Druks inquired, saying: How shall a man live forever? Behold, ye that believe also die! 20. The I'hins answered, saying: As the voice of the Lord is unseen but potent, so is there a spirit in man unseen and potent, which shall never die, but ascend to heaven to habitations prepared by the Lord. 21. And many of the Druks pondered on these things, and THEIR THOUGHTS QUICKENED their souls within them, so that they brought forth heirs unto eternal salvation."
-
OAHSPE First Book of the First Lords chapter II: "19 speaks about the Druks who were born genetically below the ability to understand spiritually QUICKENING their evolutionary development by THEIR THOUGHTS (pondering on the things they learned from anatomically modern man) so that they brought forth heirs unto eternal salvation.
So what may have taken the Druks 1.67 million years to develope was QUICKENED to they brought forth heirs unto eternal salvation in 2 or 3 generations.
Heir: a person who inherits or has a right of inheritance in the property of another following the latter's death.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/heir
So by definition of heir the offspring of the Druks inherited the new ability after the death of the Druks who QUICKENED their souls within by pondering on the things they learned from the I'hins, so it would have taken at least 2 or 3 generations for the effect to manifest in the heirs (a grandchild could be a heir).
This means that 1,670,000 years of evolution for Druks to evolve into modern man (Homo sapiens sapiens) was sped up to just a 100 or 200 years of evolution (Ground People, or Druks lived to be 200 years old).
10,000,000 x .75 = 7,500,000
10,000,000 x .25 = 2,500,000
7,500,000 - 2,500,000 = 5,000,000 years
5,000,000 / 1,000,000 = 5
5.0 - 3.33 = 1.67 = 1,670,000 years for Druks to evolve into Homo sapiens
The REALIZATION of the Druks sped up (QUICKENED) their evolution and changed their DNA.
-
Same cycles on other corporeal worlds is evidence for same human development on other corporeal worlds:
Oahspe Book of Es, Daughter of Jehovih: Chapter VIII:
Litabakathrava, Orion chief of 240,000 years said:
15. ..I have seen many corporeal worlds arrive at the kosmon era.
-
Same cycles on other planets with intelligent life:
OAHSPE: Book of Es CHAPTER VII:
18. On all the planetary worlds it is ever the same; certain four false Gods rise up to possess the corporeal worlds and her heavens.
-
Race number 5 is the I'huan race , 5 is a fibonacci number, 5 divided by the previous and next fibonacci numbers = 1.66 (5/3) golden ratio, the genetic ratio of the I'huan. 8/5 = 1.6 golden ratio. The I'huan was the first modern man (Homo sapiens sapiens) race and the first race to have spiritual everlasting ability WITH great physical strength AND tallness. 1.6 = 1 / .6 = 1.66 = balance = symmetry of features and characteristics = golden ratio.

-
In Oahspe the first anatomically modern humans were the I'hins.
The I'hins of Ham (Africa) had the most diversity (they were of all colors, white, yellow, red, brown, and black) whereas elsewhere the I'hins were white and yellow.
OAHSPE: The Lords' Fifth Book Chapter III:
4. Of all colors (black, white, yellow, copper, red and brown) were the tribes of Ham; nevertheless, they were I'hins (Faithists), having flat nails and short arms, and of such as desired to acquire knowledge.
-
Current genetic research have demonstrated that humans on the African continent are the most genetically diverse.[152] There is more human genetic diversity in Africa than anywhere else on Earth.
Jump up ^ Jorde, L.; Watkins, W; Bamshad, M; Dixon, M; Ricker, C.; Seielstad, M.; Batzer, M. (2000). "The distribution of human genetic diversity: a comparison of mitochondrial, autosomal, and Y-chromosome data". American Journal of Human Genetics 66 (3): 979–988. doi:10.1086/302825. PMC 1288178. PMID 10712212.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
-
"Ardi"(Ardipithecus ramidus), discovered in 2009, is considered the oldest human ancestor and to date the closest resembling the drawing of Asu man in Oahspe. Ardipithecus ramidus was discovered 128 years after Oahspe.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/10/091001-oldest-human-skeleton-ardi-missing-link-chimps-ardipithecus-ramidus.html
-
John Ballou Newbrough in 1881 drew a picture of the oldest human ancestor next to a body of water, such as a river or stream. Newbrough also drew trees next to the bank and in the distant backgound looks like a savannah grassland (low vegetation).
Recent scientific findings suggest Newbrough's inspired drawings and writings about the oldest human ancestor is accurate.
-
Archaeology & Fossils December 26, 2011
Couple finds evidence indicating earliest humans lived by rivers and streams
Husband and wife team Royhan and Nahid Gani have been studying the sediments surrounding the place where Ardipithecus ramidus, aka, "Ardi," was found in Ethiopia, and have, as they describe in their paper published in Nature Communications, found that most of the evidence in the area points to a group of people that lived near a very large river.
Ardi is believed to have lived some four and half million years ago in what is now Aramis, a hot and dry part of Ethiopia, but until now, no serious study had been done on the dirt in which the skeletal remains were found. After doing so, the Gani’s discovered that the dirt was actually layers of sandstone that appear most likely to have been the result of an ancient stream overflowing it’s banks periodically, leaving behind layers of sand. Branching out, the team discovered that the sediments indicated that such a stream was actually a river, likely twenty six feet deep and over twelve hundred feet wide.
Next they turned their attention to plant material that had been preserved in the sandstone, measuring their isotopes, and found that the material had come from grassy plants, suggesting a savannah type environment. But once again, widening their area of study, they also found that there were wide changes in the types of plant material in the area. This caused them to surmise that there were patches of forests near the rivers and streams.
Based on these two pieces of information, the team suggests that it appears Ardi, who many researchers believe is our oldest found ancestor, lived in a savannah, near fresh flowing water. Some suggest that such an environment would be consistent with learning to walk upright to see over the tall grasses.
Our finding suggests that, in contrast to a woodland habitat far from a river, Ar. ramidus lived in a river-margin forest in an otherwise savanna (wooded grassland) landscape at Aramis, Ethiopia.
http://phys.org/news/2011-12-couple-evidence-indicating-earliest-humans.html
These data are interpreted to indicate the presence of major rivers and associated mixed vegetations (grasses and trees) in adjacent floodplains. Our finding suggests that, in contrast to a woodland habitat far from a river, Ar. ramidus lived in a river-margin forest in an otherwise savanna (wooded grassland) landscape at Aramis, Ethiopia. Correct interpretation of habitat of Ar. ramidus is crucial for proper assessment of causes and mechanisms of early hominin evolution ...
http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v2/n12/full/ncomms1610.html
Oahspe Book of Sethantes, Son of Jehovih: Chapter X:
3. The Lord said: On our journey let us run through the valleys and the banks of rivers, for it is here that both asu and men dwell. And so they journeyed, surveying the earth as they sailed above. The country was mostly barren, not supporting man nor beast.
4. But by the river sides man dwelt, burrowing in the ground to avoid the heat by day and the cold by night.
"through the valleys and the banks of rivers, for it is here that..asu...dwell" - Oahspe
1992–1993...discovered the first A. ramidus fossils—seventeen fragments including skull, mandible, teeth and arm bones—from the Afar Depression in the Middle Awash river valley of Ethiopia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ardipithecus

File:Ardipithecus ramidus.jpg
ASU, THE FIRST MAN  -------------  Ardipithecus ramidus (Asu-like) above
Ardipithecus ramidus with his long arms, large hands, short legs, small sloping forehead, short neck, short frizzy hair, very similar chest, very similar lower torso with a slight curve on the side, round extended or bloated belly, and arboreal (trees) environment resembles the Asu drawing in Oahspe of the first race of man. Asu may have had some variations with features in common with Ardipithecus, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and Homo erectus. At the time Oahspe was written in 1881 the first early man fossils found were of Homo neanderthalis in 1856 and they did not resemble the Asu drawing in Oahspe closely like Ardipithecus ramidus does.

Asu Man
A means without (like a-moral), Su means spirit. Without spirit means without spiritual understanding. Without spirit also means without the spiritual genetics for everlasting life.
-
In India, the Veddic word asu (later changed to "Adam" in Persian) meant "without spirit" or "earth-born" (aboriginal).
This is seen also in Hebrew, where adam means "red earth", and in meshe'adam, the Azerbaijani Yeti or Bigfoot, the most animal-like version of man.
- THE LOST HISTORY of the LITTLE PEOPLE (2013) by Susan B. Martinez, PhD (in Anthropology).

Asu and I'hin (the first and second race of man)
1 Corinthians 15:47 The first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven.
-
Religious and spiritual concepts, Spiritual understanding of the ancestors of modern man:
Religious behaviour is thought to have emerged by the Upper Paleolithic, before 30,000 years ago at the latest,[1]...coinciding with the first appearance of Homo neanderthalensis and Homo sapiens.
There are suggestions for the first appearance of religious or spiritual experience in the Lower Paleolithic (significantly earlier than...pre-Homo sapiens), but these remain controversial and have limited support.[2]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleolithic_religion
There is no evidence of spiritual concepts of pre-Homo sapiens man (Homo heidelbergensis, Homo ergaster, Homo-erectus, Astralopithecus, Ardipithecus Ramidus).
This agrees with Oahspe saying the Druks, Yaks, and Asuans were born not capable of spiritual understanding (no spiritual or religious concepts like a beast).
These (the Druks, Yaks, Asuans) were the races and sub-species of primate-man that were geneticly below the mark of the beast.

The Hominidae; also known as great apes[notes 1]) form a taxonomic family of primates, including four extant genera:
chimpanzees and bonobos (Pan);[notes 2]
gorillas (Gorilla);
humans (Homo); and
orangutans (Pongo).[1]
The term "hominid" is also used in the more restricted sense as hominins or "humans and relatives of humans closer than chimpanzees".[2] In this usage, all hominid species other than Homo sapiens are extinct. A number of known extinct genera are grouped with humans in the Homininae subfamily, others with orangutans in the Ponginae subfamily.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hominidae

What apes and monkeys can teach us about the roots (Asu, the Beast) of human aggression.
-

Bigfoot, also known as sasquatch, is the name given to an ape-like creature that some people believe inhabits forests, mainly in the Pacific Northwest region of North America. Bigfoot is usually described as a large, hairy, bipedal humanoid. The term sasquatch is an anglicized derivative of the Halkomelem word sásq’ets.[2][3]
Most scientists discount the existence of Bigfoot and consider it to be a combination of folklore, misidentification, and hoax,[4] rather than a living animal, because of the lack of physical evidence and the large numbers of creatures that would be necessary to maintain a breeding population.[5][6] A few scientists, such as Jane Goodall,[7] Grover Krantz, and Jeffrey Meldrum, have expressed interest and some measure of belief in the creature.[8]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigfoot

<--Notice profile of Yak has flatter nose and face than the short I'hin and the tall I'huan (modern man), larger jaws, and top of head with sagittal keel. 
---------------------------------------------

The Yak that is pictured in Oahspe as compared to the I'huan (Modern Man, 6 feet tall, 200 pounds, foot 11 inches long) has these measured/estimated statistics:

Foot = 15 1/2 inches long, flat with no arch.
Chest = 2 x thickness of modern man
Height = 8 feet 5 inches tall (full length)
Weight = 563 to 715 lbs lean and muscular, 800 to 900 lbs stocky.
Step or walk = with a deep bend in leg/knee
Posture = upright but curved, stooped or bent over
Arms = much longer than modern man's
Color = brown and black, grey or white with old age
Strength = hand grip could break a horse's leg
Dwelling = ground, burrow, cave
Clothes = none, went naked
Body hair = more than modern man due to not cutting hair, no clothes, and exposure to cold. Hair on top of head is short, does not grow long.
The above description is very similar to a Bigfoot or Sasquatch
-
Anatomy of the Sasquatch Foot
By Grover S. Krantz
Many plaster casts and photographs of footprints have been examined in detail which were reportedly made by a species of bipedal primate, the sasquatch or bigfoot. They prove not to be simply enlarged human footprints but show several peculiarities. These include flat arches, a double ball, and enlarged heels. Examination of leverage mechanics of the human foot indicates that with excessive body weight certain modifications would be advantageous. The expected modifications are the same as those seen in the reputed sasquatch footprints.
Within the last century, several hundred people have reported sightings of gigantic man-like animals in the forests and mountains of the Pacific Northwest. Hundreds more have seen the huge footprints left by these hairy creatures. Possibly ten times as many people have seen these giant primates and their tracks without reporting anything to newsmen or law officers for fear of ridicule.
The animal in question is commonly called sasquatch — based on one Indian name for it — or "bigfoot" for obvious reasons. If this animal really exists, it would probably be man's closest living relative and a member of the zoological family Hominidae. It is not human, however, in any sense of the word; all reports agree on its lack of language, artifacts, and social organization.
There are a number of reasons to believe at least certain sasquatch tracks could not have been made by hoaxers. Their obscure locations would mean that perhaps a hundred times as many tracks were laid as have been discovered. Lengths of stride and obstacles stepped over often surpass anything a man can do. Depths of imprints would require a hoaxer to carry many hundreds of pounds of extra weight, thus making the walking accomplishments even more impossible. Independent toe movements as noticed in some tracks would require a special device to accomplish.
To all these must now be added the fact that our supposed hoaxer is an expert on human anatomy with a very inventive mind. He was able to create from nothing all the details of how a foot might be redesigned to support a body weight several times that of a man. And he has continued to plant these tracks over more than a lifetime, always showing only vague hints of these anatomical peculiarities. These include great width of heel, a double ball, and a straighter row of similarly sized toes. Many sasquatch prints show what is called a double ball at the base of the big toe.
No matter how incredible it may seem that the sasquatch exists and has remained uncaught, it is even more incredible to believe in all the attributes of the hypothetical human track-maker. As Sherlock Holmes put it, "... when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth." Even if none of the hundreds of sightings had ever occurred, we would still be forced to conclude that a giant bipedal primate does indeed inhabit the forests of the Pacific Northwest.
http://woodape.org/index.php/about-bigfoot/articles/91-anatomy-of-the-sasquatch-foot

Researchers Claim To Have Sequenced Bigfoot DNA.

December 1, 2012 

A genetic researcher is saying that Bigfoot DNA tests prove that the hairy creature really does exist...five years on their study of purported Bigfoot hair...researchers say their DNA sequencing suggests the animal is a human relative that developed about 15,000 years ago as a hybrid cross of modern Homo sapiens with an unknown primate species..."The genome sequencing shows that Sasquatch mtDNA is identical to modern Homo sapiens, but Sasquatch nuDNA is a novel, unknown hominin related to Homo sapiens and other primate species.

"Our data indicate that the North American Sasquatch is a hybrid species, the result of males of an unknown hominin species crossing with female Homo sapiens."..."The male progenitor that contributed the unknown sequence to this hybrid is unique as its DNA is more distantly removed from humans than other recently discovered hominins...

"Sasquatch nuclear DNA is incredibly novel and not at all what we had expected. While it has human nuclear DNA within its genome, there are also distinctly non-human, non-archaic hominin, and non-ape sequences. We describe it as a mosaic of human and novel non-human sequence."...

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/49980829/ns/technology_and_science-science/t/meet-your-uncle-bigfoot-dna-report-claims-beast-part-human/

http://sasquatchgenomeproject.org/

Genetic (DNA) evidence for Bigfoot (Yak or Monstrosities betwixt Man and Beast):
http://sasquatchgenomeproject.org/linked/authors_response_to_passing_reviews.pdf

In OAHSPE SYNOPSIS OF SIXTEEN CYCLES CHAPTER 1 verses 22,27 it describes males of an unknown hominin species (Yaks - Ground People) crossing with female Humans (I'hins) 24,000 years ago:

"22. ...there were ground people, with long arms, who were large...The ground people were brown and black, and they lived to be two hundred, and even four hundred years old...they laid hold of the I'hin women when they went into the fields, and forced them, and thus brought forth again the I'huan race...

The DNA physical evidence supports what Oahspe says about the existence (or former existence) of Druks/Yaks/monstrosities betwixt man and beast/Asuans and non human/non ape male Yaks/Druks mating with female humans tens of thousands of years ago (15 to 24 thousand years ago). The female humans were attacked and raped by man-beasts in the fields (country, rural area) when they left the city (urban area) or village.
-
Scientists have discovered that about one in thirteen people have flexible ape-like feet.
A team studied the feet of 398 visitors to the Boston Museum of Science.
This is known as a mid-tarsal break and is similar to what the Boston team identified in some of their participants.
This makes the middle part of the foot bend more easily as the subject pushes off to propel themselves on to their next step.
Dr DeSilva told BBC News how we might be able to observe whether we have this flexibility: "The best way to see this is if you're walking on the beach and leaving footprints, the middle portion of your footprint would have a big ridge that might show your foot is actually folding in that area."
The bone structure of a two-million-year old fossil human relative, Australopithecus sediba, suggests it also had this mobility.
http://bigfootresearch.blogspot.com/2013/06/scientists-say-1-in-13-people-have.html
One in thirteen people = 7.69 % of people have flexible ape-like feet. What percent of people have a midtarsal break and a 15 1/2 inches long foot like the Yak drawn by John Ballou Newbrough?
If only 7.69 % of average foot sized people have a midtarsal break, then applying that same ratio of one in thirteen to the small percent of the population that have 15 1/2 inches long feet and weigh over 480 pounds, that would make an extremely small population of people.

----------------------------------------------------

Yaks-Bigfoot-Sasquatch.jpg

^-- Removing OAHSPE's Enigma By Jim Dennon
Are the Yaks, and Yak hybrids extinct, or are they endangered sub-species??
Are there any non Homo sapiens non Ape Hominidae still alive on earth?

bigfootprintpic.gif

Compare the normal foot with arch and the flat foot with no arch (below) to the above drawings/pictures of a I'huan (modern man) and Yak (Bigfoot or Sasquatch).

  <--Notice the arch on top of the foot of the I'huan, and no arch on top of the foot of the Yak. The Yak shows a groove midway on the bottom of the foot and a curve under the first segment of the toe (Proximal phalanx bones) nearest the foot, and enlarged heels. The I'huan does not show a midway groove on the bottom of foot, nor does the I'huan foot show a curve under the first segment of the toe nearest the foot.

Above Proximal phalanx bones of toe closest to the foot, laterial view.
http://www.imaios.com/en/e-Anatomy/Limbs/Leg-arteries-bones-3D

Tribal-Bigfoot-drawings-1.jpg
Bigfoot-size-comparison.jpg

Above size and body comparison between 3 primates, a modern man, a Gorilla, and a man-beast (Bigfoot or Sasquatch), Notice the Bigfoot is 2 feet taller than the modern man. The Bigfoot's arms are longer than his legs. The modern man's arms are shorter than his legs. The Bigfoot's chest is twice as wide as the modern man. The Bigfoot's abdomen is smaller than his chest. The Gorilla's abdomen is larger than his chest. Are Oahspe's Yaks the same as a Bigfoot or Sasquatch? The Yak in Oahspe is 2 feet taller than modern man (I'huan) and the arms of the Yak are longer than his legs. The Yak's chest is twice as wide as a modern man. The Yak's abdomen is smaller than his chest just like the description of a Bigfoot or Sasquatch. Do Yaks still exist? Oahspe speaks of "monstrosities betwixt man and beast". Oahspe says "And the monstrosities, and the Yaks, and the druks, died off, tens of millions of them. And even yet they were not extinct". OAHSPE: First Book of the First Lords.

Any surviving modern Bigfoot, Sasquatch, would probably be a cross between Yaks-Druks and half I'huans, and be very tall and large wild man. Genetically that would be quarter 2, quarter 3, and half 5 (see top of this page, Evolutionary scale of humans) = 3.75 (below the mark of the Beast and not capable of spiritual understanding or everlasting life) or a cross between Yaks-I'huans and half Druks, a quarter 2, a quarter 5, and half 3 = 3.25.
-
Hairy Bigfoot, Sasquatch
Although humans appear hairless compared to other primates, with notable hair growth occurring chiefly on the top of the head, underarms and pubic area, the average human has more hair follicles on his or her body than the average chimpanzee. The main distinction is that human hairs are shorter, finer, and less heavily pigmented than the average chimpanzee's, thus making them harder to see.[75]
75.Jump up ^ Why Humans and Their Fur Parted Way by Nicholas Wade, New York Times, August 19, 2003.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human

Hairy-Man-Bigfoot-Sasquatch.jpg

Above left is a photo of a hairy modern man. Above right is artwork of a Bigfoot-Sasquatch looking like a hairy Yak-man of Oahspe.

Asu-hand-grip-and-modern-human-hand-grip.jpg
Asu-Adam-hand-grip-branch-Orangutan-South-Pacific.jpg

Above are close-up enlarged drawing of Asu man (Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough in Oahspe, and comparison to modern human grip (top) and Orangutan ape grip of tree branch. The Asu hand and grip more closely resembles that of an Orangutan of Borneo (near where the continent of Pan was broke off in the southwest Pacific Ocean) than that of a modern human.
Orangutans are intelligent and generally peaceful vegetarians.  Most of the time, they live solitary lives quietly browsing fruits and leaves high up in trees.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/primate/prim_7.htm
-
Science. 1927 May 20;65(1690):481-8.
RECENT DISCOVERIES RELATING TO THE ORIGIN AND ANTIQUITY OF MAN.
evidence of anatomy and morphology...
The brachiating hand of the ape was used as a hook, apes do not grasp a branch with the fingers and thumb but hook the whole hand over the branch, as trapeze workers do to-day-and the thumb was therefore a grave danger...arboreal ancestors...
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17806528

Palmer grasp reflex = a response that was once essential for ape infants in arboreal life (grabbing and hanging from tree branches).

Palmar - palm of the hand grasp reflex.

The vestigial grasp of infants
In WEIT there is a chapter on vestigial traits, defined as those traits that are evolutionary remnants of features useful in an ancestor, but now either useless or used in a different way.
But behaviors can be vestigial, too.  One such behavior is the “grasping reflex” of human infants.  When you put your finger into the palm of an infant, it will immediately and securely grasp it.  The grasp is so tight that it’s sometimes hard to make the kid let go!  It is said — though I have never seen this demonstrated — that up to a couple months of age a baby can hang suspended from a horizontal stick for several minutes.
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/the-vestigial-grasp-of-infants/
Young infants can hold onto objects with both their hands and their feet—and hold tightly and tenaciously. They lose this behavior—which is instinctive, prompted by inserting a finger or a stick in their hands or feet—a few months after birth.
While we’re not 100% sure what it represents, I’d bet that it’s a genetic holdover from our ancestry as hairier primates.
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2014/04/08/the-grasping-reflex-of-babies-a-vestigial-trait/
The palmer grip of human babies is a genetic evolutionary remnant of Asu, which is evidence for the origin of man story in Oahspe instead of the Adam story in the Bible.

Chimpanzee-human-Asu-Adam-hand-wrist-fingers.jpg

Close-up enlarged drawing of Asu man (Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough, and comparison to modern human hand and chimpanzee hand.
The hand of Asu resembled the hand of a chimpanzee as much or more than the hand of a modern man.
-
The outer part of the hand opposite the thumb of Asu is slighlty concave (middle part curves inward toward thumb) shaped, like the Chimpanzee hand. The modern human hand has a convex (middle part curves outward away from thumb) shape opposite the thumb.
-
Evolution of the human hand:
The chimpanzee hand.
The chimpanzee hand will be taken as a model for the hand of the hominid ancestor. The most ancient hominid fossils closely resemble chimpanzees, who are genetically our nearest relatives (Sibley, 1992; Ruvolo, 1997). Pan and human lineages diverged 5–7 million years ago (Mya), about the time the first hominid specimens appear in the fossil record (Klein, 1999). The fingers, metacarpal and carpal bones of the chimpanzee hand are elongated, but in typical primate fashion the thumb is small, weak and relatively immobile
The grips of the chimpanzee differ profoundly from those of humans (Napier, 1960). For suspension from horizontal supports, chimpanzees use a ‘hook grip’ of the four flexed fingers (Napier, 1960; Marzke & Wullstein, 1996). With vertical supports, a diagonal hook grip is used (Susman, 1979; Marzke et al. 1992). The thumb may touch the support, but does not squeeze it against the palm.
Chimpanzees use this grip when flailing with sticks, but when the arm swings forward the hand tends to lose its grip, possibly due to weakness of the thumb and its inability to overlap the index finger
During its evolution, the human hand gained two unique grips, first identified by Napier. He called them the precision grip and the power grip and depicted them by the grip of a sphere and a cylinder.
According to Napier, in the power grip the clamp around the cylinder is formed by the partly flexed fingers and the palm, counter pressure being applied by the thumb, which is wrapped over the dorsum of the fingers, where it acts as a buttress to reinforce the grip. Marzke (1992a)...in the human hand. The thumb has lengthened and can be fully opposed to the fingers, which have shortened.
A longer, fully opposable thumb...also facilitates gripping a club by enabling the thumb to overlap the ends of the index and middle fingers.
...chimpanzee has been ascribed to an adaptation for both quadrupedal and arboreal locomotion (Tuttle, 1967; Dainton, 2001). The earliest known hominid hand bones are assigned to Ardipithecus ramidus kadabba from Ethiopia...The bones are said to be similar to those of a younger species, Australopithecus afarensis.
In fossils from Ethiopia and Tanzania (3.2–3.5 Mya), designated A. afarensis (White et al. 1993; Johanson et al. 1994) the hand retains chimpanzee-like features and would still have been effective for tree-climbing.
The fingers were shorter than those of the chimpanzee and the thumb is longer (Marzke, 1983, 1992b; Stern & Susman, 1983), but the fingers are long relative to the thumb when compared to modern humans (Marzke et al. 1992).
Australopithecus habilis (formerly assigned to Homo: Wood & Collard, 1999).
A. habilis gave way to Homo ergaster (African H. erectus) about 1.8 Mya. Verified hand bones from this taxon are unavailable. Those of H. neanderthalensis (200–30 kya: Klein, 1999) are similar to those of modern humans,
The fossil record indicates that...During this prolonged period of evolution, the hand underwent a profound remodelling...Two unique human handgrips were thereby produced. Called the ‘power’ and ‘precision’ grips by Napier (1956) who identified and described them...
Articles from Journal of Anatomy
National Center for Biotechnology Information
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1571064/
--
Ardipithecus ramidus discovered in Ethiopia, are virtually intact, and they show...She had extremely long fingers and an opposable thumb, with a comparatively narrow palm.
-
Ardipithecus ramidus, unlike Australopithecus afarensis, ...has an opposable big toe — rather like a thumb on the foot — that would have allowed the species to grasp branches while climbing.
http://www.nature.com/news/ancient-human-ancestor-had-feet-like-an-ape-1.10342

Above and below: much magnified and contrast enhancement view of Asu's feet and toes show an opposable
large curved big toe which would help Asu grip tree limbs.
Ardi - human origins
Ardi had an opposable large toe ...
Whereas Lucy had feet much like ours Ardi's foot had a long, curved big toe that would help her grip tree limbs but the other four toes were stiffer and flat which would have been helpful for walking on two legs.
http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/evolution/ardi_human_origins.html
Ardi's foot (right) has an opposable toe for grasping branches.
http://science.sciencemag.org/content/326/5960/1598.1.full?rss=1
The grasping reflex is evident in the feet, too. If you put your finger along a baby’s toes from the sole side, it will grasp with those toes.  And when a baby is sitting down, its “prehensile” feet assume a curled-in posture, much like what we see in an infant or an adult chimp.
https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/07/16/the-vestigial-grasp-of-infants/
The Plantar grasp reflex is a genetic holdover from our Asu ancestry. The Plantar grasp reflex is more evidence that the human origins as described and pictured in Oahspe is accurate.

Asu-Adam-Ape-short-legs-bent-knees.jpg

Above comparison of the drawing of Asu man (Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough in Oahspe to a photo of a Gorilla sitting. Notice both the Asu and the Ape have short feet, short legs and bent knees of about the same proportional size. Notice how Asu (Adam) is sitting down on the ground like the ape (gorilla), leg and knees bent and close to buttocks, leaning to the side and supporting himself with one arm. Apes (like the orangutans and gibbins especially) have very long arms with...comparatively short legs...Newbrough in Oahspe drew Asu (Adam) the first man with very long arms and comparatively short legs. Asu's long arms like with the apes helped him in traveling efficiently in arboreal settings by climbing, swinging and grabing branches, fruits and leaves high up in trees (as is seen in the drawing in Oahspe).
-
Asu appears to have a longer pelvis or hip region (for quadrupedal locomotion) than a modern man, more like a ape. Asu's short legs and short feet is adapted for quadrupedal locomotion.
Longer legs are needed for bipedalism to help support at least 2.5 times their body weight.
Modern man has longer feet and developed arches for more efficient support of their bodies.
-
The very long arms to short legs ratio helped Asu with walking on all fours on the ground. Form follows function, behavior, and intelligence. Because the Creator Jehovih made the first man different than any other animal, without a pre-program or instinct, man would have been lacking in knowledge, intelligence, and the genetic ability to understand and learn, so he would not have the form of walking upright on two feet (bi-pedalism) which frees the hands for carrying and using tools and building things that the mind concieves of. Since Asu was made without the mental ability to conceive of inventing and building things his form would have matched his behavior and ability, and he would not need to walk upright and therefore he would mostly be a quadrapedal and arboreal traveler like the apes, and having very long arms and comparitevly short legs would be in harmony with that type of mental-spiritual state. His hands would have been more advantages for grabing branches and traveling in the trees than for holding a tool, writing a book, or typing on a computer, thus form follows function and behavior. The purpose of Asu man was to be used as a base for physical developement for future races and sub-species of man, it was not intended to be a complete and perfect man like the Adam of the book of Genesis in the Bible. Adam in the book of Genesis in the Bible appears to from the story in the Bible to have been created a complete perfect man already knowing how to walk, speak, capable of understanding the Great Spirit, etc...it appears he was created with that ability like a pre-program or instinct like an animal. The first race of man was not made in the image and likeness of God (of the dust of the earth, not spiritual), but the second race of man (the I'hins) was in the spiritual image and likeness of heaven (God). The first race was of the earth only, earthly without (zero) spiritual understanding, and having no (zero) ability (no genetics) to understand spiritual things (such as creating things, or abstract thought).
-
Asu and I'hin (the first and second race of man)
1 Corinthians 15:47 The first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven
-
To be of the earth only, or of the dust of the earth means without spiritual ability or understanding = zero, like corpor. Corpor = zero.
-
OAHSPE'S BOOK OF COSMOGONY Chapter 8:1
1. ..To ethe give motion one hundred, or ninety-nine (as the case may be); to corpor give zero, that is, no motion (of itself); to ji'ay give sixty-six; to a'ji give thirty-three.
The numbers above represent percent of spirital ability or power, it applies to mankind.
-
Asu (Adam) man was given the number of corpor = zero
The I'hins (Abel), I'huans, Ghans, Mongrels, Kosmon, and Iesu races were given the numbers from 66-99.
The Yaks were given the number 11-12.5 (Yaks were 87.5% Asu, 12.5 numbers from 100% earth-Asu).
The Druks (Cain) were given the numbers 33 (1/3) to 66 (2/3), a'ji, the mark of beast, the mark of Cain (war).  A'ji is 1/3 ethe, and 2/3 corpor.
The Ethereans, Orians, and Nirvanians are givern the number of ethe = 99-100
-
Man created blank (zero), animals with instinct
Oahspe SECOND BOOK OF LORDS CHAPTER I:
17. Man inquired of the Lord: Thou hast shown the bird how to build her nest, and the carnivore how to scent the subtle track of his prey, and the spider to weave his net; but as to the manner of man's house, or as to herbs that are good or are poisonous, thou has not shown man.
18. The Lord said: All the instinct that is in the bird, or beast, or fish, or insect, or creeping thing, was created with them, but man was created blank; and yet man shall attain to more subtle senses than any other living creature.
-
OAHSPE BOOK OF INSPIRATION. CHAPTER XII.
7. Thus differently created I man from all other things on earth;

Asu-Adam-first-man-face-drawing-art.jpg

Close-up enlarged drawing of Asu man (Adam) by John Ballou Newbrough in Oahspe, showing a powerful build, human-type face, small skull-brain capacity, low cranial vault, sloping forehead, top of head is crested (pointed head), hair covering most of the body, not including the face with the exception of the cheeks and jawline, patches of bare skin on the chest, neck is very short and thick, short tightly coiled matted hair on head, disproportionately long arms compared to a modern human, a relatively pronounced bone above the eyes, large eyes.
-
Sagittal crests are found in robust great apes, and some early hominins (Paranthropus). Prominent sagittal crests are found among male gorillas and orangutans, and do occur but only rarely in male chimpanzees...
The largest sagittal crest ever discovered in the human lineage belongs to ...Paranthropus aethiopicus...the earliest known robust hominid ancestor and the oldest robust australopithecine discovered to date
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittal_crest,
-
Some of the male Australopithecus afarensis had small sagittal crests.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/hominid/australo_2.htm

Evolution-change-of-man.jpg

__^__Left, fossils of human ancestors__ ^__Right, races of man in Oahspe__
Above skull and head comparisons of the progress of the races of man in Oahspe to the fossil record:
Fossils left side-----Right side Oahspe races
_________________________________
Modern Human-----I'huan, Ghan, Mongrel
Homo erectus-------Yak, Druk type
Australopithecus---Asu-like variation 
Ardipithecus--------Asu-like

Natural-range-of-apes.gif

Above map showing the natural habitat range of modern apes, all in the tropical regions of Africa, southeast Asia,and Indonesia. Borneo where the gibbons and orangutan apes are found is close to the sunken continent of Pan where Oahspe said Asu man originated (see map below).

panmap.jpg

Orangutans May Be Closest Human Relatives, Not Chimps
Orangutans, not chimpanzees, are the closest living relatives to humans, a controversial new study contends.
By contrast, humans share at least 28 unique physical characteristics with orangutans but only 2 with chimps and 7 with gorillas, the authors say.
The finding, which has the potential to spark a radical rethink of human origins, is being met with caution.
But looking at physical traits rather than genetic ones, orangutans are a better match, Grehan and Schwartz say.
Tell-tale features shared by both orangutans and humans include thickly enameled molar teeth with flat surfaces, greater asymmetries between the left and right side of the brain, an increased cartilage-to-bone ratio in the forearm, and similarly shaped shoulder blades.
"A hole in the roof of the mouth that was supposedly unique to humans is also present in orangs," Schwartz said.
"Humans and orangs have the widest-separated mammary glands, and they grow the longest hair," he added. "Humans and orangs actually have a hairline, in contrast to virtually all primates, where the hair comes down to the top of the eyes."
The team also highlighted orangutan-type traits in the teeth and jaw remains of ancient fossil apes from Africa and Europe.
Based on their analysis, the authors suggest "that humans and orangutans share a common ancestor that excludes [living] African apes."
But orangutans are native to Southeast Asia, which creates a problem: How did humans evolve in Africa if we are so closely related to the geographically distant orangutan? (Explore a human migration time line.)
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/06/090623-humans-chimps-related.html
Humans More Related To Orangutans Than Chimps, Study Suggests
June 18, 2009 — New evidence underscores the theory of human origin that suggests humans most likely share a common ancestor with orangutans, according to research from the University of Pittsburgh and the Buffalo Museum of Science. Reporting in the June 18 edition of the Journal of Biogeography,
Paleoanthropologist Peter Andrews, a past head of Human Origins at the London Natural History Museum and coauthor of "The Complete World of Human Evolution" (Thames & Hudson, 2005), said that Schwartz and Grehan provide good evidence to support their theory. Andrews had no part in the research, but is familiar with it.
"They have good morphological evidence in support of their interpretation, so that it must be taken seriously, and if it reopens the debate between molecular biologists and morphologists, so much the better," Andrews said. "They are going against accepted interpretations of human and ape relationships, and there's no doubt their conclusions will be challenged. But I hope it will be done in a constructive way, for science progresses by asking questions and testing results."
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090618084304.htm
The morphological data on which their study is based include features of anatomy, reproductive biology, and behavior. For example, among the great apes only humans and orangutans have thick tooth enamel, long hair, male facial hair, concealed ovulation, a preference for private, face-to-face mating, and an ability to construct shelters and beds.
No doubt this is going to cause a fair amount of debate in the scientific community. Which is great. Stay tuned.
Reference:
John R. Grehan and Jeffrey H. Schwartz (2009). Evolution of the second orangutan: phylogeny and biogeography of hominid origins Journal of Biogeography, in press.
http://pleiotropy.fieldofscience.com/2009/06/orangutans-to-replace-chimpanzees-as.html

Gestation-periods-human-apes.jpg
Hominid_Chromosomes-Apes-Human.gif

Above two charts show man and apes are very close in gestation periods AND chromosome numbers.

Asu-man was the borderline (dividing line) between apes and man, animal-man, Ardipithecus ramidus.

Chromosomal differences between Homo and Great Apes

Humans have a characteristic diploid chromosome number of 2N=46 whereas the other Great Apes (orangutans, gorillas, and chimps) are all 2N=48. The large metacentric Chromosome 2 of Homo appears to be the result of a fusion between two smaller telocentric chromosomes found in the other Great Apes. In the figure above, Q-banding patterns in the chimp acrocentrics are homologous to those of the 2p (short) and 2q (long) arms of human Chromosome 2: the alignments are indicated. As well, ape telomeres (the ends of chromosomes) characteristically consist of tandem repeats of the motif 5'-TTAGGG-3'. Such sequences are also present In the human centromere (the middle of the chromosome), but at one point the order changes abruptly to 5'-CCCTAA-3', the reverse complement of the standard pattern, as predicted by a telomere to telomere fusion of ancestral ape-like chromosomes.

See extended discussion at [http://www.gate.net/~rwms/hum_ape_chrom.html]
http://www.mun.ca/biology/scarr/Human_Ape_chromosomes.htm

"two chromosomes that are still separate in the great apes fused together in the human lineage to produce our chromosome 2."
- page 128 of Bryan Sykes' 2001 book (7 Daughters of Eve)

Oahspe said Adam (Asu) the first race of man originated on earth 79,000 years ago.
"everybody who is alive today is descended from one man and one woman who lived somewhere around 50,000 to 100,000 years ago."..." with modern DNA testing, there is more and more scientific evidence that I am right"
http://www.anusha.com/allmen.htm
-

What do you think a Sasquatch is?
There is a legend that says that there were three groups of people living on the Earth and they were the big people, the little people, and the Yakama. They all live together off the land and followed the traditional ways.
Along came the (early settlers) and they started to show the Yakama their tools and the Yakama started to follow them. The big people and the little people saw what was happening and they went up into the mountains they wanted nothing to do with the new ways. The Yakama weren’t allowed to go with them because they were following the white men and using their tools.
http://www.bigfootlunchclub.com/2013/04/today-in-bigfoot-history-apr-07-2006.html
White men (early settlers) = Ghans of Oahspe
Oahspe  BOOK OF OSIRIS, SON OF JEHOVIH. CHAPTER I:
12. Not like lambs are the Ghans, but lions untamed, born conquerors, with seed to learn and reason toward all things, faith in mastery, but not faith in Jehovih.

Yakama = I'huan-Ghan (Ongwee-ghans) of Oahspe
big people = Yaks of Oahspe
little people = I'hins of Oahspe
(see plate below)

Ihin-Ihuan-Yak.jpg

The curve of your lower back absorbs shock when you walk. It is uniquely human. You can see in John Newbrough's (inspired) drawing above (in Oahspe) of the I'hin and I'huan (anatomically modern man) the curve in the spine of the lower back. The Yak (87.5% Asu-Adam) is missing the lower back spinal curvature needed for fully bipedalism.
-
Oahspe said Yaks which were 87.5% Asu, sometimes walked erect (like Homo erectus), and sometimes walked on all fours (which indicates Asu walked on all fours).
OAHSPE: First Book of the First Lords Chapter II:
5. ...And the Yaks did not walk wholly upright, but also went on all fours.
OAHSPE chapter 1:1,2,3:
AFTER the creation of man, the Creator, Jehovih...called his angels, who were older than the earth, and he said unto them: Go ye, raise man upright, and teach him to understand.
And the angels of heaven descended to the earth and raised man upright. And man wandered about on the earth. This was the second era.
"raised man upright" means Asu (Adam) did not walk wholly upright, but also went on all fours. The fossil record (skeletons) of early man is objective evidence that the inspired drawings of early man by John Newbrough (in Oahspe) are true. 

Spine-skull-bi-pedalism-early-man-modern-man.jpg

The spine of a chimpanzee connects with the skull at the back, holding the head at an angle.
The spine of humans connects with the skull underneath, stabilizing the head when walking upright.
Your spine connects with your skull underneath and near the center, holding your head firmly upright.
Comparing drawings of skulls of a early human (left), and modern human (right) with inspired drawings by John Ballou Newbrough of a I'huan (modern man) head and neck and Yak (87.5% Asu) head and neck.
Notice the spine of the I'huan (modern man) connected with the skull underneath stabilizing the head when walking upright.
Notice the spine of the Yak (87.5% similar to Asu) connects with the skull near the back, holding the head at an angle.
Notice the difference in John Ballou Newbrough's drawing of the jaw of the I'huan and the jaw of the Yak. The jaw of the I'huan is angled going down from the back to the front, matching the skull of a modern man (Homo sapiens).
The jaw of the Yak is straight from the back to the front, level, matching the skull of a early hominid (Australopithecus or Homo erectus).
John Newbrough's inspired drawings in Oahspe of the I'huan, Yak, and Asu (Adam) indicates the beast-human development and percent of human bipedalism and beast quadrupedalism.
Quadrupedalism is a form of terrestrial locomotion in animals using four limbs or legs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrupedalism
-
Image courtesy of Karen Carr Studios.
Walking Upright | The Smithsonian Institution
http://humanorigins.si.edu/human-characteristics/walking
-
Physical anatomy is a manifestation of spiritual ability. Man walks upright to free his hands to hold tools and build things that his mind and spirit creates. The bird does not have arms and hands.
-
The spiritual and physical is connected by genetics (vortexian record). Vortexya (c, light) is intermediary between ethe and corpor. Light (electromagnetic record) is both wave (etheic) and particle (corpor). The I'hin received his spiritual ability (genetics) from the angels (heaven). Asu lacked the spiritual genetics and received his physical ability (genetics) from the beast (a'ji, nebula, semuan firmament, earth).
Asu and I'hin (the first and second race of mankind)
1 Corinthians 15:47 The first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven. Adam (Asu) was of the dust of the earth lacking spiritual heavenly genetics (ability). Jesus was not the second man, angels (from other planets) walked the earth (and were called men) before Jesus. Adam stood for mankind. Man refers to mankind or race or sub-species. The second man of heaven (with heavenly-spiritual genetics) was a type, race, or sub-species of mankind called I'hin or Abel (able, spiritual ability). Adam (Asu) was the first man, Eve (the angels, Es) were the first woman, Abel (I'hins) was actually older than his brother Cain (druks) and was the second man. The Druks had the mark of the beast (the mark of Cain) and were war-like and slew the I'hins.

Human-genetics-pendulum.jpg

Above drawing of the pendulum of human genetics, angel-man, beast-man, dan, a'ji, spirit, flesh, 1/3, 2/3, 33, 66, and the harmonic relationship to prophetic numbers and a logarithmic spiral galaxy (Cosmogony and Prophecy).
-
Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy Chapter 7:18: Tables of times and measurements
Loos, 33, Loo'is are angels that are Masters of Generations, 33 is the number of Man (human) and the number of a generation (genetics). 33 (33.3 %) is also the number or percentage needed for fully modern man (man 33 or 3/3, 1/3 or 33.3 % angel), the threshold for everlasting life, spiritual understanding and ability, the seperation or dividing line between fully man (spiritual-man) and beast-man or animal. Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy: Chapter VII: 17....from one to a thousand for each and every characteristic designated. Number man 1 and 33,...[1 = 1/3 + 2/3 = 3/3 or 33, composed of harmonic multiples and divisions of prophetic cyclic numbers 11, 22, and 33, and logarithmic spiral galaxy percentages]. Oahspe Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy: Chapter VIII:7. Consequently the two most important periods for the prophet's consideration come within thirty-three and sixty-six, or, as they of old said, man and beast. In which measure man is divided into two parts (man and beast), Man (human) = 33. Number man 1....divided into two parts = .33 and .66, 1/3 and 2/3 = 1.  Man is divided into two parts = double helix (spiral) DNA structure = logarithmic spiral galaxy. Man 3/3 (33), DNA and galaxy is divided into two parts, light and darkness, dan and a'ji, 1/3 and 2/3 spiral.
-
Angel
. A spirit man. Su, also, su-gan, and gans-spe. [1 part of man, 1/3]
Beast. The animal man. The earthly part of man. [2nd part of man, 2/3]
Dan. Light. A cyclic dawn, as the Arc of Spe'ta or Arc of Bon....A dan lasts about thirty-three years. [dan lasts 33 years = 1/3 = 33]
http://www.angelfire.com/in2/oahspe3/glossary.html
33 dan in Oahspe:
OAHSPE: Book of Aph CHAPTER XIV:
3. ...thirty-three is the division of dan corresponding to one hundred dans to each cycle. 2
2 Thirty-three years is one generation or mortal dan: thirty-three hundred years is one cycle or dan of the earth's life.

OAHSPE Plate 48.--THE CYCLIC COIL.
(See Oahspe Book of Cosmogony) The numbers of the beast shall be sixty-six, and six hundred and sixty-six, and the parts thereof. Because in the coil of the cycle, behold the distances are two thirds of a circle.

In a double-helix (DNA) corkscrew structure (below) each spiral or loop is 1/3 of the total. Each loop is spaced 1/3 distance apart. Second loop is spaced 2/3 distance of total. The whole (double-helix) cycle is divided into two parts spaced 1/3 distance apart.

Spiral-coils-loops-33-66.jpg

Harmonic, 2 and 8 based structure of DNA, Computer code, and spiral galaxy structure.
The DNA structure is a microscopic logarithmic spiral galaxy (double-helix primary vortex). DNA is composed of 2 strands, twisted together, 2 coils of a cycle. DNA like computer code is composed of a 2 base system, 0 and 1 for computer code, dan and a'ji, or ethe and corpor for DNA and spiral galaxies. The computer codes of zeros and ones contain information program instructions. DNA code contains genetic information instructions. Spiral galaxies contain a'ji and dan, ethe and corpor which influence genetics and behavior. Computer code bits is in harmonic multiples and divisions of 8. The two (2) base system is a harmonic division of 8. Multiply 2 x 2 x 2 x 2 = 4, 8, 16, 32 which are harmonic parts (divisions) or multiplications of 8 which are 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, etc...start off with 1 whole and multiply x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, x 2, etc... you get all divisions or multiples of 8, like harmonic musical notes or computer bits. The 1 whole man like DNA and the spiral galaxies is divided into 2 parts, multiplied by 2, by 2, by 2 etc.. This shows up in the 22 year prophetic numbers cycles, 22 = 1 whole cycle, divided into 2 parts, 1 part = 11 x 2 = 22, 11 x 3 = 33, 11 x 6 = 66, 11 x 9 = 99 +1 = 100, x 2 = 200, x 2 = 400 (Mayan Baktun), harmonic multiples of the base 11. Modern human DNA contains both (2 base) Asu and Angel genetics twisted together in a spiral-helical staircase but evolved (multiplied) to include the genetics of I'hin, Druk, I'huan, Mongrel, Ghan, and Kosmon, 6 plus Asu and Angel = 8.
-
Computer binary code 8 bit-system:
1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1024 2048 4096 8192 16384 32768.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/8630344/understanding-binary-code
-
An extremely common operation on numbers in computers is to operate by two, as in divide, multiply, take to the power of or take the square root. Most of these operations massively benefit from binary digit storage.
Binary wasn't chosen thoughtlessly, there are good reasons.
http://scientopia.org/blogs/goodmath/2012/06/03/numeric-pareidolia-and-vortex-math/
-
The simplest form of increase in the number of individuals (population growth) is binary cell division.
Given binary cell division, we expect the number of cells thru time to follow the powers of 2, namely 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, etc.
This is basic pattern of geometric growth.
http://www.uic.edu/classes/bios/bios101/x113_files/outline/index.htm
-
A number of cosmological studies show that galactic superclusters exist at regularly spaced intervals:
Observations of the redshift distribution of galaxies in narrow (~ 40 arcmin) pencil-beam surveys to z  0.3 (Broadhurst et al. 1990; hereafter BEKS) reveal a highly clumped and apparently periodic distribution of galaxies. The distribution features peaks of galaxy counts with an apparently regular separation of 128 Mpc, with few galaxies between the peaks.
http://ned.ipac.caltech.edu/level5/Sept01/Bahcall2/Bahcall9_2.html
Megaparsec (Mpc)
One parsec equals about 3.26 light-years or 30.9 trillion kilometres (19.2 trillion miles).
A distance of one million parsecs (3.26 million light-years or 3.26 "Mly") is commonly denoted by the megaparsec (Mpc). Astronomers typically express the distances between neighbouring galaxies and galaxy clusters in megaparsecs.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parsec
3 / .26 = 11.53 = 11 prophetic number
3.26  / 1.09 = 2.99 within
3.26  / 1.1 = 2.963 within .037 harmonic multiple of 1.1
The prophetic cyclic number 11 (the base) is a harmonic multiple (x 10) of 1.1
111 (gow, dan, light) is a harmonic multiple of 3.26 (light-years, parsec).
111 / 3.26 = 34.04 = within .04 harmonic
The universe shows a harmonic multiple periodic (cyclic) spacing (cosmogony-cosmology) of an octave (8).  128 Mpc is a harmonic multiple of 8 the number of harmony, just like the computer bit code. Harmonic divisions and multiples of 8 are 1/256, 1/128, 1/64, 1/32, 1/16. 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128 Mpc, 256, etc... 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emergence of the Human 'SuperBrain' 75,000 Years Ago
There is archaeological evidence for the evolution of a human "super-brain" no later than 75,000 years ago that spurred a modern capacity for novelty and invention, according to John Hoffecker, an archaeologist at the University of Colorado.
Hoffecker says there is abundant fossil and archaeological evidence for the evolution of the human mind, including its unique power to create a potentially infinite variety of thoughts expressed in the form of sentences, art and technologies.
An internationally known archaeologist...Hoffecker.
While anatomical fossil evidence for the capability of speech is controversial, the archaeological discoveries of symbols coincides with a creative explosion in the making of many kinds of artifacts. Abstract designs scratched on mineral pigment show up in Africa about 75,000 years ago and are widely accepted by archaeologists as evidence for symbolism and language. "From this point onward there is a growing variety of new types of artifacts that indicates a thoroughly modern capacity for novelty and invention."
Humans were producing perforated shell ornaments, polished bone awls and simple geometric designs incised into lumps of red ochre by 75,000 years ago. "With the appearance of symbols and language -- and the consequent integration of brains into a super-brain -- the human mind seems to have taken off as a potentially unlimited creative force," he said.
http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2013/06/emergence-of-the-human-superbrain-75000-years-ago-the-neurologic-internet.html
The evolution of the human "super-brain" occured when Angels bred with Asu and produced the I'hin 73,000 years ago according to Oahspe.
-
In OAHSPE SYNOPSIS OF SIXTEEN CYCLES CHAPTER 1 verses 22,27 it describes a hominin species (Yaks - Ground People) that laid hold of the I'hins when they went into the fields (wilderness).
According to Oahspe these Ground People have been grabbing children size people as far back as 24,000 years ago.
I'hins were very short, the size of a modern child (3 to 4 feet tall).
-
1855: SE Oklahoma, Choctaw Territory. Bigfoots had been raiding Choctaw settlements for some time, mostly stealing crops. But then they started stealing human children, apparently to kill and eat them, and the Choctaw had had enough. A party, organized by Joshua LeFlore, set out to get the Bigfoots. They tracked them to a giant mound with the bodies of 19 human children the Bigfoots have been kidpnapping and eating. The Bigfoots are covered in hair, and the bad smell of their shit and piss is everywhere. Most of the humans’ horses rear up and throw their riders, which is what horses do when they see Bigfoots.
The humans attack the Bigfoots, and LeFlore empties his revolver at one, but it’s useless. The Bigfoot kills LeFlore’s mount with a single blow and then tears off LeFlore’s head. The rest of the Indians open up with .50 caliber Sharp’s buffalo rifles (designed to drop a buffalo) on the beasts, from experience aiming at their heads, as this is the best way to kill them. Two Bigfoots drop. A Choctaw Indian hunts down LeFlore’s killer and finishes it off with a hunting knife. Then he decapitates it for good measure. 3 Bigfoots were killed in all.
The Indians bury what’s left of the kids, then bury their leader, giving him a 21 gun salute. Then they make a bonfire and burn the Bigfoots on the fire. They ride home, heading for bad dreams, maybe lasting a lifetime.
Many Western tribes describe areas of their territory that were totally off limits, and the Indians refused to go there, for these were the territories of the Bigfoots. These territories were full of game, but the Indians were so terrified that they avoided them like the plague. Why would Indians avoid a forage-rich area area due to creatures that don’t even exist? Bigfoots have probably learned to fear and respect us due to our weaponry. These creatures still abduct , rape, and eat humans. Check all the missing persons in America’s National parks, The things are expert killers.
http://robertlindsay.wordpress.com/2011/04/18/human-bigfoot-war-oklahoma-1855/
-
Every case in the “Missing-411 books are peculiar, that’s why they were written. One of the more recent and highly unusual cases occurred in South Carolina in 2011 and is a case that’s highlighted in the new book. Before I advise an audience about the facts behind a story, I always ask them to remember back when they had young children. In this story the boy was 21 months old. I ask the readers to remember back when they were around a child that young. How well could they toddle and how far could they walk. How quickly could they get out of your view? How much stamina does a 21-month old child have? In this incident the boy was in his residence with the family dog and his mother. She left the room momentarily and somehow the boy and the dog got outside. There was a large open field surrounding the residence before reaching thick woods. The mother realized that her son and the dog were gone and ran outside to check the yard. The boy and the dog were not only not in the yard, they weren’t anywhere in sight. The mother called the sheriff and searchers started to arrive in mass. By late in the afternoon, the weather started to change to rain. Searchers continued to walk the surrounding property and found nothing that first night.
The first morning of the search, a sheriff’s deputy and a natural resource officer were in kayaks on a river two miles from the victims residence, they were just two of hundreds looking for the boy. A search helicopter was flying above the river looking for a body and had just flown over the kayakers. The two law enforcement officers were paddling upstream from the area of the residence and just turned a corner in the river when they made an amazing find. It was 2:30pm when they looked at a sandbar in the middle of the river. They found the missing boy alive lying on his back in the middle of the sand. They immediately called the helicopter back to the scene to pickup the boy and take him to his residence. The pilot confirmed that he had just flown over that section of river and the boy WAS NOT on the sandbar, minutes later he’s lying there.
There are many confusing aspects to this case. How the boy got away from his residence so quickly is not understood. How a 21 month old can manage to go through thick woods, enter the river and arrive at a sandbar in the middle of the river, the million-dollar question. Why didn’t the boy respond to hundreds of searchers that were in the woods that first night? The boy did not suffer from hypothermia even though the weather had been in the low 40’s with rain. The boy’s dog did reappear at the residence. This is one of three cases where very small children have disappeared from the interior of a residence while with the family dog. Each case is equally fascinating
--
I'm reading this fascinating two volume book right now, and am curious if anyone has ANY idea how to account for the bizarre phenomena of massive storms occurring right after so many of the people disappeared, hampering search and rescue efforts.
Coincidence?
“Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is enemy action”
This doesn't signal any potential BF connection to me, though many of the stories do. Unless somehow the BF is able to know when a big one is coming, kind of like dogs and other animals are super sensitive to weather, and that makes them more bold when attacking or kidnapping? Yes, it's a wild theory, just putting it out there for discussion.
There could definitely be a correlation to BF activity and weather. A lot of bears go to their dens and hibernate when a snowstorm hits, and there is a lot of speculation that they do so so that their tracks will be hidden to the den, due to the vulnerable nature of hibernating. There could be a myriad of reasons that BF's could be active during storms, or leading up to one. Wind covers any noise they'd make, rain could deteriorate any tracks (to a certain extent) or scent, snow covers their tracks, etc. I'm not sure what their patterns are, or if they are smart enough to think like that, but it's an interesting topic.
--
Simply a parallel that I have drawn from unrelated research. In the Scandinavian countries in past Centuries there was a belief in Ogres. Some of them hairy men, stinky, smelly, and putrid. Lived reclusively in swampy areas and out of the way places. What I find interesting about the superstition of Ogres is that they were said to have stolen people from villages to eat or procreate and if they thought that they were being pursued, they would strike the ground with a great iron club that they were known to carry. The iron club held magical properties that would create a storm so they could get away.
I draw the parallel because I find it interesting that the myth fits somewhat with the missing cases. Not because I believe in Ogres. It could be that the responsible thing has been around for centuries, and has been doing this all along. Some of the myths that I have found searching the internet strike creepy likenesses to the missing 411 cases.
--
Even deer are said to be sensitive to a coming storm. They will go out and feed more open than usual and then bed down for the storm. I have known lots of old timers (people) that could feel a storm coming. In this day and age storms don't make much difference to 'people' because we have modern convenience. Back int he day though it could be devastating or deadly to get caught out in one. There is 'proof' that animals sense things like earthquakes, tsunami's, and major storms. Could it be the opportunity of the coming storm?
--
A common theme in these cases is storms occurring right after people disappeared, a heavy rain or snow storm, making search-and-rescue efforts difficult. Rain could deteriorate any tracks (to a certain extent) or scent, snow covers their tracks, etc.
OAHSPE BOOK OF COSMOGONY AND PROPHECY CHAPTER X:
2. ...many animals, prophesy in regard to an approaching winter. Even birds begin to fly toward tropical regions whilst it is yet warm weather.
3. These creatures prophesy by the direct action of vortexian currents upon them. They feel what is approaching, BECAUSE THE UNSEEN CAUSE IS ALREADY UPON THEM.
-
I wonder if using the stats compiled in these cases of where the missing were actually found would be useful in solving the 100s of cases that no remains were ever found. In many cases, the searchers said they did not believe the missing could have gotten to the place the remains (or live) were found. We're talking about children from 16 months old to 4 years old and so many of them. Why can't the child tell rescuers what happened to them? They are described as having a glazed look or just will not say anything.
My own basic premise on what's going on is something is abducting these folks for a time and then dumping them where they will be found and not relying on them as a food source (another thread). Nothing else fits the facts for a majority of them. I have my own experience of being lost as a youngster and I reacted completely different than what is described in these cases, except I did climb a fire tower so I could try and see some type of civilization. Why would a 2-3 year old climb these mountains? It is beyond strange.
Would a human abduct these kids and then bring them back into an area that is being searched by 100,s or people to have them found before they die? What about the adults that go missing? What made the bedding area next to the bodies in a few of the cases? So many unanswered questions. Why won't trained dogs track these missing kids? Is there no trail for them to track and if so, why? Why in almost every case are the shoes missing and never found?
It seems to me that there should be a way to show that statistically and only based on known facts, that there is something preying on children and adults in the wild. The first thing that needs to be done is acknowledge that there is an unknown pattern to these missing and to the extent it exists. Once that can be determined, guidelines for SAR could be developed and implemented. I have a very difficult time thinking about these families and kids and what they have went through.
--
Some similarities include:
- missing shoes/boots of victim, never found.
- missing clothing of victim, never found.
- dogs refusing or unable to pick up victims scent.
- almost always, storm occurs soon after victim disappears.
- if body is found, located in swamp area or at much higher elevation than where disappearance occurs.
- 18 month to 2 year olds found a great distance away and without clothing/shoes.
- if found alive, kids unable to say what happened to them.
- a couple of cases that kids say a bear took them and protected them.
- some cases of body found in area that was already searched numerious times.
- many cases of absolutely nothing ever found, even with thousands of SAR folks looking for any signs. The case of Trenny Gibson really disturbed me as did many others. In her case, the NPS did release boxes of files. The FBI would not release anything. Well documented case that had similarities to other cases
--
I finished the Eastern version of the book a few weeks ago, there were a few cases in which armed military personnel were called out to assist in the SAR.  The author mentions how odd this was, using Special Forces or Rangers.
http://bigfootforums.com/index.php/topic/29296-missing-411/page-11
-
Similarities:
- dogs refusing or unable to pick up victims scent. - Missing-411 books
"hunters attempt to pursue the creature with dogs, but the dogs refuse to give chase." - The_Legend_of_Boggy_Creek
"Several attempts were made to track the creature with dogs, but they were unable to follow its scent" - Fouke_Monster (Wikipedia)
-
a few months later James Crabtree was squirrel hunting ..."there was something strange about that evening, I couldn't put my finger on it, It was just a feeling I had. There didn't seem to be as many birds and little small animals around, they seemed mighty scarce.
It stepped right out in plain sight, right out there in front of me. It was some kind of a thing I've never seen before, well he stared at me for a little while and just slipped out of sight and I never saw him agian." - James Crabtree, _The Legend of Boggy Creek_
-
First, they said, they realized that all sound had disappeared around them - the
sounds of nature. ... - "Missing 411" Books
-
the ever-popular Bigfoot emerges frequently in the Pacific Northwest and Texas has reported numerous encounters with its aptly named Big Thicket Wild Man. Yet, few know that a member of this brotherhood of hairy hominids makes a home here in Arizona. He's known as the Mogollon Monster.
Those who say they've crossed paths with the beast regularly describe an eerie silence prior to their encounter, an appreciable stillness in the woods that commonly surrounds predatory animals.
http://www.weirdus.com/states/arizona/bizarre_beasts/mongollon_monster/index.php
-
a couple of cases that kids say a bear took them and protected them. - Missing-411 books
"the creature, which she initially took to be a bear," - Elizabeth Ford on Fouke_Monster
-
Tiny Walhalla Girl Is Kidnaped By Large Black Bear
Katie Flynn, three-year-old child, was captured and carried away by a huge black bear
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=110&dat=19320422&id=eFscAAAAIBAJ&sjid=zVMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=2256,3854001
Page Eight .Tiny Walhalla Girl Kidnaped By Large Black
Child Tells own story...
"Big dog came up to me, took me in his arms and walked away with me"....
http://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=110&dat=19320422&id=eFscAAAAIBAJ&sjid=zVMEAAAAIBAJ&pg=6994,3890992
What kind of "Big dog" carries away a child "in his arms"?
"took me in his arms" is plural, "arms" (means 2 limbs) if the hairy creature took her in his arms and "walked away" then it was walking on 2 limbs (bi-pedal locomotion).
-
Newspaper: The Morning Herald › 1951 › June › 9 June 1951 › Page 2
Missing Children Found [In Mountains- SANTA FE, N.M]...Youngsters Wonder From Picnic...Three small children were found tired, hungry and thirsty but otherwise unharmed tonight, after 28 lonely hours in the rugged Sangre De Crlsto mountains. On hearing the news, their parents burst into tears. While hundreds of searchers trudged the Jagged, steep mountains with lanterns and flashlights last night, the three--Larry McGee, 7, his sister Janet, 6, and Steven Cross [3], in low log. "I took good care of them, Larry boasted. "Once I heard some one yelling, but I didn't answer because I thought they were big gorillas. "Gee, I'm hungry. When I get home I am going to eat and eat' State Police Chief Joe Roach radloed stated that none of the three suffered any ill effects from tbe 45 degrees night temperature. They were clad only In T-shirts and blue jeans when they wandered away yesterday from a family picnic. The youngsters first were sighted in Box Canyon--about 3 1/2 miles from the spot where they disappeared--by three airmen from Kirtland base at Albuquerque. First radio report of their being found came from Tom Gardner Santa Fe radio repairman "They're all all right," he reported. "Not scared or crying. But they sure are hungry, tired an thirsty."
http://www.newspapers.com/newspage/20741509/
Why would the kids be afraid to yell out to searchers unless they had been frightened by something that looked like "big gorillas"? What type of "big gorillas" would be in the mountains of Northern New Mexico?
-
Children found scratched up and disoriented, many miles away - Missing-411 books
Bobby Ford treated at a hospital for scratches and shock - The Legend Of Boggy Creek
-
The Legend of Boggy Creek is a 1972 horror docudrama about the "Fouke Monster," a Bigfoot-type creature that has been seen in and around Fouke, Arkansas since the 1950s.
The film, which claims to be a true story,
In another scene, hunters attempt to pursue the creature with dogs, but the dogs refuse to give chase.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Legend_of_Boggy_Creek
The Fouke Monster, also known as the Southern Sasquatch, is a legendary cryptid reported near the town of Fouke in Miller County, Arkansas, during the early 1970s.
Although most cases date from the early 1970s onwards, Fouke residents claim that an ape-like creature had roamed the area since 1964,[6] but those sightings had not been reported to news services. Local legend also holds that the creature can be further traced back to sightings in 1946.[7] Most early sightings were in the region of Jonesville. Owing to this, the creature was known as the "Jonesville Monster" during this period.[8][9]
According to Elizabeth Ford,  reached through a screen window while she was sleeping on a couch. It was chased away by her husband and his brother Don, who were returning from a hunting trip. The creature returned shortly after midnight (Sunday, May 2), when it was reported to have grabbed Bobby Ford across the shoulders as he stood on the porch, throwing him to the ground. Bobby managed to crawl free from the creature and was later treated at St. Michael Hospital in Texarkana, Texas, for scratches across his back.[12] He was suffering from mild shock when he arrived.[13]
Several attempts were made to track the creature with dogs, but they were unable to follow its scent.[12].
Jump up ^ Green, John Willison (1978). Sasquatch: The Apes Among Us (1st ed.). Saanichton, B.C.; Seattle, WA: Hancock House. ISBN 978-0-888-39018-9.
^ Jump up to: a b Ogilvie, Craig (2002-10-08). "Legendary Arkansas Monsters Have Deep Roots in History". Arkansas Department of Parks and Tourism. Archived from the original on 2007-09-27. Retrieved 2006-10-01.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Powell, Jim (2001-06-24). "The Fouke Monster: A look at how the media recorded the reports of the 1971 alleged sighting of a large creature in rural Miller County, Ark.". Texarkana Gazette. Archived from the original on 2003-08-03. Retrieved 2006-10-01.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fouke_Monster
--
A former cop has put together hundreds of case files regarding clusters of missing persons in national parks where the circumstances are strange.
"I was staying in a hotel off park service land and there was a knock at the door," said David Paulides.
The person who came to confide in law enforcement veteran Dave Paulides was a government employee who told one heck of a story about people who vanish in national parks, places like Yosemite, but also national forests, including the Toiyabe west of Las Vegas.
In the years since the knock at the door, Paulides has scoured small town newspaper archives and pestered federal agencies for records. He found so many cases of missing people that one planned book became two, filled with more than 400 cases of people who went into national parks but never came out.
The people who vanish often do so under the noses of other people. In the many cases of kids, they disappeared while with the parents.
"Being parents, being responsible people, we understand there is no way my son or daughter wouldn't know their way back from just being down the road getting a ball. But it happens all the time."
The missing defies logic. They hike uphill, for instance, often steep climbs. Children as young as 2 or 3 years old are found a day or two later, many miles away and over mountain ranges.
"Some kids are found phenomenal distances away that would make no logical sense to any parent," Paulides said.
Weird things happen to their clothing. The missing often shed their clothes right away, even in bad weather. Clothes are found, but not the people.
"The ranger described to me if you were standing straight up and you just had your pants on and you melted directly into your pants. That's what it looked like to him. The pants were lying on the ground in a very neat pile."
The missing defy normal search and rescue practices. Bodies are found in places that are all but inaccessible, or they are found in the open, in areas that were repeatedly searched earlier. Bloodhounds or other tracker dogs are often befuddled.
-
In 1966, 6-year-old Larry Jeffrey of Henderson disappeared while playing with his two brothers, setting off a massive 16-day search by as many as 1,000 men. Former Sheriff Ralph Lamb remembers it clearly.
"We walked shoulder to shoulder but couldn't find him," Lamb said.
"There are no large predators per se, so we can't worry about mammals taking them. He was in a fairly remote area where there is no vehicular access; so there is no car abduction. The boy just walked into oblivion.
-
Martin Sean Evans
• 2 years ago- +
?This reminds me of Native American folklore (Paiute, Zuni, Tewa) about Ogre Kachinas that would snatch children.  
-
Mark Baxter Dc • 2 years ago- +
?I think two things are going on here.  Advanced hypothermia causes people to feel hot and makes them want to take their clothes off.  Such a state also results in amnesia since the brain doesn't work too well when it's very cold.  Secondly, large predators such as mountain lions are found in many of these national parks, and can easily carry a small child off to devour it in a more remote region. 
-
<Reply•  Ryan
? I can understand why you would suggest these two scenarios as possible explanations.  I would encourage you to read the actual case files.  You will quickly dismiss these two explanations once you have.
-
<Reply•Link Ryan • 2 years ago- +
?I've read both of Mr. Paulides' books on this subject and I can say without hyperbole that they are the two most disturbing books I've ever read.
-
 Solution >bluedawg1 • a year ago- +
?I know what it is NOT taking these people! Why cant we just admit what is going on here...I'll just come out and say it. There exists a race of intelligent hominids in our nation's wilderness areas. On occasion, for reasons yet to be determined, one or more of these creatures will wait and watch in total concealment, then abduct a human. These abduction in their totalitarian probably number in the thousands on a global scale, yet the abductions appear to be carefully spaced out, via time and distance as to not draw attention. This type of phenomena is no secret to the many Native American tribes. They're ancestors were here long before the Euros arrived and they know...Call me crazy, but sometimes the evidence will lead us to places outside our comfort zone. I happen to be an occasional hunter, hiker and explorer. I would be much more comfortable knowing that when I'm asleep at night, in a tent, in the middle of now where that I AM NOT SHARING THE WOODS WITH A HIGHLY INTELLIGENT PREDATOR THAT CAN GROW UP TO 12 ' TALL AND WEIGH 1,000 LBS...God Bless America!
-
Hugh Jarss >Solution • a year ago- +
?Bravo, Mat, for talking about the "800 pound gorilla" in the room. People, do some research and you will be amazed. the two books by David Paulides are utterly shocking. People aren't getting "lost". they are being abducted. And often eaten...... Read the books. The facts don't lie. People do not vanish without a trace. it just doesn't happen.
http://www.8newsnow.com/story/18150329/i-team
-
David Paulides Missing 411 Coast to Coast.
STRANGE DISAPPEARANCES IN NATIONAL PARKS
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8msMKW4fZDE
Missing 411 - David Paulides Interview
--
Bigfoot ...often seen near and around bodies of fresh water; streams, lakes and rivers.
http://www.bigfootencounters.com/sightings.htm
"he always travels the creeks" - The Legend of Boggy Creek
"through the valleys and the banks of rivers, for it is here that..asu...dwell" - Oahspe
-
OAHSPE: Book of Wars Against Jehovih CHAPTER XXI:
7. ..the brown burrowers in the ground, with long [flat] noses and projecting mouths, very strong, whose grip of the hand could break a horse's leg. The brown people, though harmless, were naked, living mostly on fish and worms and bugs and roots; and they inhabited the regions of the great river, Tua.
-
people are often found (dead or alive) in creek beds or ponds/lakes - Missing-411 books
--
val·ley 1. An elongated lowland between ranges of mountains, hills, or other uplands, often having a river or stream running along the bottom.
1. an elongated depression between uplands, hills, or mountains, esp. one following the course of a stream.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/valley
Here Oahspe said Asu (this would include the Yak which was 87.5% Asu) dwelt where ranges of mountains, and a river or stream was. Mountain range areas next to a river or stream is also forested areas.
The valleys where Asu and Yaks dwelt followed the course of a stream = "he always travels the creeks" - The Legend of Boggy Creek
Many State and National forests (Parks) are located in or next to a valley, such as Yosemite National Park, California, Glacier National Park, Montana, and Cataloochee valley in the Great Smoky Mountains of North Carolina (Great Smoky Mountains National Park).
-
"There are many different types of Sasquatch, for instance there is a type that burrows into the ground like a giant rodent. “Zoobey” is a bigfoot that lives around Rockglen Saskatchewan… I believe he lives in the ground. It’s been told the entrance to his burrow about 2.5 – 3 feet around. I hope some day they find one of these burrowing Bigfoots."
http://bigfootresearchuk.com/bigfootresearchworld/sasquatch-dna-video-evidence
-
"I am highly convinced that if bigfoot is real, they live in underground civilizations. I feel this is the only way a species such as it could survive or avoid capture."
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread317957/pg5
-
Missing 411 Documentary (Bigfoot) .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7jDy_rwFls
-
Book of Sethantes, Son of Jehovih: Chapter X:
3. The Lord said: On our journey let us run through the valleys and the banks of rivers, for it is here that both asu and men dwell. And so they journeyed, surveying the earth as they sailed above. The country was mostly barren, not supporting man nor beast.
4. But by the river sides man dwelt, burrowing in the ground to avoid the heat by day and the cold by night.
OAHSPE: First Book of the First Lords Chapter 1:
23. The I'hins shall labor and clothe themselves, and I will abide with them; but the druks shall wander in the wilderness, neither laboring nor clothing themselves.
CHAPTER II:
5. Now, because the druks had not previously obeyed the Lord, but went and dwelt with the asu'ans, there was a half-breed race born on the earth, called Yak, signifying ground people; and they burrowed in the ground like beasts of the forest. And the Yaks did not walk wholly upright, but also went on all fours.
7. And the arms of the Yaks were long, and their backs were stooped and curved.
-
In the 1889 Proceedings of the Royal Geographical Society, one L. H. Ransome recounts the time ten years before when a wild man was captured near the northeastern town of Maroantsetra:
We were informed by a trader from Mauritius, a Mr. Carmes, who saw him, that ... [he] was caught by some Malagasy in the employ of a Manahar trader, while asleep on the branch of a tree, and when taken resisted violently, biting his captors severely; after a few days' confinement, however, he ceased to be aggressive. Mr. Carmes describes him as being a powerfully built man of about five feet nine inches in height, his face and body being thickly covered with long black hair; his mode of walking was peculiar, as he traveled very fast, with his head down, occasionally going on all-fours, his eyes (which resembled in expression those of an animal rather than of a human being) invariably being fixed on the ground. When caught he was perfectly nude, but wore clothes when provided with them. He could never be induced to eat flesh or any kind of cooked food, subsisting entirely on manioc and other roots; nor would he sleep in a recumbent position, but when resting preferred to squat on hands and feet on a stool in a corner of the house. After some weeks he commenced to learn a few words, and by means of these and signs it was understood that he had a father and two brothers in the forest where he was taken. These were found and surrounded by a search party one night, but being disturbed, easily eluded their pursuers, jumping from tree to tree like monkeys and running on all-fours. The captured man died five months after being taken.
NOVA Online | The Wilds of Madagascar
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/madagascar/surviving/legends2.html
-
In North America there are hundreds if not thousands of caves, many of which have yet to be explored completely. We also know that modern man in its early beginnings used caves as shelter from the elements. Some may find the idea of Sasquatch using caves farfetched, but a creature with this supposed high level of intelligence may use this as an advantage in some areas of North America.
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2012/03/is-sasquatchbigfoot-using-underground.html
We know that cavepeople existed -- early humans and other species closely related to humans inhabited caves.
Some of the prehuman or humanlike species that may have lived in caves include Homo antecessor, Homo neanderthalensis (Neanderthals), Homo erectus and Homo heidelbergensis. Early humans, Homo sapiens, also used caves sporadically.
http://history.howstuffworks.com/historical-figures/cave-dweller1.htm
Below map of caves (red areas) in the United States

Caves-in-the-United-States.jpg
mapuscaves.jpg

Above Map of U.S. Caves Image Credit: USGS
You can judge for yourself whether or not there is a high density of subterranean caves concentrated in Missing 411′s cluster sites map.
During David Paulides 3-17-2013 interview with George Knapp, he also brought up some natural features of the landscape which play a role time and again in these missing-persons cases, and one of the regions he talked about were boulder fields. In particular, he mentioned that some cultures around the world believe that certain rock features were inhabited by spirits, and have a superstitious aura of folklore and eeriness surrounding them.
Certain rock formations and boulders were believed to be places where spirits dwelled; not only that, some places amidst boulder fields and rock formations were considered to be “windows” and “doorways” between this world and some other realm.-
http://noliesradio.org/archives/59170

missing411_map.jpg

From his books, “Missing 411 Western US and Canada” and "Missing 411 Eastern United States", written by David Paulides, is a map (above) showing the locations of missing persons.  “Large dots on the map represent clusters of missing people. When you study the map, you can clearly see a defined area in the middle of the US where there are no missing people meeting the book’s criteria. The light colored tabs represent females; the dark tabs represent males.”
Texas and Florida, one could easily write an entire book on the the many disappearances in these states. The missing people cases seem to follow mountain ranges and/or forested areas that provide good cover for concealment. In the middle of the US there is alot of wide open flat plains areas that lack mountain ranges and forests.
Many of the missing people in rural areas are in clusters and most often occur near bodies of water. Bodies of water such as lakes, reservoirs, rivers, creeks, etc..attract prey and predators who wait for or stalk their victim.

US-map-mountain-ranges-plains.jpg
Bigfoot-Sasquatch-sightings-map.jpg

Above is a Bigfoot sightings map…. is there a correlation? Most Sasquatch sightings are in mountain and forest areas, and not in the middle areas of the United States where the Great Plains is. Mountains and forest areas (of National Parks etc..) provide cover that is lacking in the middle areas (Great Plains) of the United States. The above map demonstrate a pattern. Areas near large bodies of water (creeks, rivers, lakes etc..) will have trees and thick vegetation for cover. In Linda Godfrey's books on the "Dogman/Werewolf" phenomenon, she points out that the vast majority of sightings occur near a large body of water.
http://gummerfansmonsterhunterhq.blogspot.com/2011/01/dammit-planet.html 

Great-Plains-map-middle-USA.jpg

The Great Plains (map above) are a broad expanse of flat land, much of it covered in prairie, steppe and grassland, which lies west of the Mississippi River and east of the Rocky Mountains in the United States and Canada. This area covers parts of the U.S. states of Colorado, Kansas, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Texas, and Wyoming, and the Canadian provinces of Alberta, Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
The term "Great Plains" is used in the United States to describe a sub-section of the even more vast Interior Plains physiographic division, which covers much of the interior of North America.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Plains

Berries-nuts-sold.jpg

Berries and berry bushes play a overwelming role in many of the missing 411 cases. Berries may be a food source for an abducter/predator. Above is a fruit, berries, and nuts agricultural map. Berry agricultural areas closely match the missing persons map of the Missing 411 books and also the hot spots of Bigfoot sightings. Notice the lack of berry agricultural areas in the middle of the United States. The map seems to show where berries grow, they make up a higher percentage of agricultural products sold than where berries are not grown. There is an easy to identify divide (gap) between western and eastern USA. John Ballou Newbrough in 1881 drew a picture of a early extinct (71,000 years ago) hominidae named Asu that was the first ancestor of man. In the drawing Asu is reaching for berries on a tree as a probable food source. The Yaks (Ground People) which were 87.5% Asu probably also eat berries and fruits but were also carnivorous. The descendants of Asu and Yaks today still like to eat berries. In the drawing Asu appears to be next to a body of water (you can see reflections from the trees on the surface of the water).

<--Asu picking wild berries from trees and bushes

Mountain-Ranges-USA.jpg

Mountain ranges USA with rivers.
http://www.riverfacts.com

Forests-resources-of-the-united-states.jpg
Forest-land-USA.jpg

Forest lands USA

A study published for the Journal of Biogeography in 2009 by J.D. Lozier et al. used ecological niche modeling on reported sightings of Bigfoot, using their locations to infer Bigfoot's preferred ecological parameters. They found a very close match with the ecological parameters of the American black bear, Ursus americanus. They also note that an upright bear looks much like Bigfoot's purported appearance and consider it highly improbable that two species should have very similar ecological preferences, concluding that Bigfoot sightings are likely sightings of black bears.[94]
94. Jump up ^ J. D. Lozier, P. Aniello, M. J. Hickerson (2009). "Predicting the distribution of Sasquatch in western North America: anything goes with ecological niche modelling". Journal of Biogeography 36 (9): 1623–1627. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02152.x.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bigfoot
Map of distribution of American black bear above.
The American black bear (Ursus americanus) is a medium-sized bear native to North America. It is the continent's smallest and most widely distributed bear species.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_black_bear
Notice on maps above there are some places where there are clusters of missing people fitting the criteria of the Missing 411 books and where Bigfoot-Sasquatch hot spot sightings are, there are no black bears, such as Texas, Ohio, Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, southern Wisconsin etc.. ruling out that what witnesses saw was a bear.

us_precipitation_map.jpg

Above map shows average annual precipitation in the United States. There is a correlation between average annual precipitation and Bigfoot sightings. A high density of rainfall would be crucial for the survival of a large primate in the wild. Places with green, blue and violet colors have the most rainfall (24 to 120+ annual inches). Places with yellow, orange, and brown colors have the least rainfall (20 to 1 annual inches). Places with green, blue, and violet colors match mountain ranges and forest regions, they also match Missing 411 books clusters of missing people, and they also match bigfoot sightings even in ares that have no black bears.

map_of_Homo-erectus_range.gif

Some Homo erectus were able to move into the seasonally cold temperate zones of Asia and Europe.
http://anthro.palomar.edu/homo/homo_2.htm
Homo erectus lived in warm and cold climates as north as 40 degrees latitude near the Chinese Korean border which is equivalent to Northern California and Ohio in the United States.
Homo erectus close relatives (Homo Ergaster) reached 50 degrees latitude in Europe at the France/Belgium border which is equivalent to the Pacific Northwest area of Vancouver Canada/Washington State border.
These northern latitude areas of 40 to 50 degrees are where modern Bigfoot/Sasquatch sightings occur.
-
Meganthropus - Homo erectus palaeojavanicus
As of 2005, the taxonomy and phylogeny for the specimens are still uncertain, although most paleoanthropologists consider them related to Homo erectus in some way. However, the names Homo palaeojavanicus and even Australopithecus palaeojavanicus are sometimes used as well, indicating the classification uncertainty.
The majority of paleoanthropologists believe that Meganthropus is related to H. erectus, but it is not agreed upon how closely.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meganthropus
Some scientists claim that Meganthropus was 2/3 the size of Gigantopithecus. This would put the hominid at slightly over 8 feet and at least 500 pounds.
Meganthropus; these creatures had bone densities several times thicker than ours
, and presumeably had muscle mass more like that of an ape than a human. Extreme muscle mass would be absolutely necessary in order to support the bulky skeleton.
One of the most interesting things that the fossil record reveals is that we went through a period of extreme giantism. These were people routinely over 7ft tall, they were huge.  This was before we turned into the modern humans of today.
http://www.thenakedscientists.com/HTML/content/interviews/interview/833/

true-bigfoot.jpg

Swamp Bigfoot Photo 2006 by Wayne Burton in Ohio.
Whilst the image is difficult to see, the claims come from a highly respected source in the local community, with no previous connection to Bigfoot and in an area not expected to be used for fakes (damp, swampy ground). Figure in question marked here with an arrow.
http://realbigfootphotos.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/true-bigfoot.jpg
-
By The late Dr. Carleton S. Coon
Professor Stephen I Rosen of the University of Maryland has identified its hair as that of a previously unknown primate--and he has hair on file for most of the living primates of the world. He has given me permission to state that its scale pattern is primate, its pigment dense and black like that of a lowland gorilla, and its internal structure "unusual." This last refers to the medulla of the hair strand, which is quite variable among the living races of man.
On this substantially impeccable evidence we may be justified to state that a primate other than man, which is either a pongid (ape), or hominid (kind of man) is alive in Washington, even if the hairs did not come off the animal identified as the creator of the local disturbance.
Coon became a member of the National Academy of Science in 1952 and served as president of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists in 1961- 1962. He passed away in 1981.
http://www.bigfootencounters.com/articles/coon.htm
-
Was the Patterson-Gimlin film ever proven to be a hoax?
http://www.bfro.net/news/korff_scam.asp
-
MK.Davis discusses the value of the Patterson film .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_QujK8909MM
-
M.K.Davis discusses the neck and shoulder movement of the Patterson
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SvwqR3umYcA
-
M.K.Davis looks at the posterior of the Patterson subject.mp4 .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9lB7s3YzTFg
-
M.K.Davis discusses a possible second Sasquatch in the Patterson
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dX6HD9Cgj-0
-
M.K.Davis discusses the authenticity of the Patterson Sasquatch film
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hmCo7mfr_OM
-
M.K.Davis discusses the use of false color to enhance an image Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yXx8kJdsV8E
-
M K Davis discusses the use of false color to enhance an image Part 2.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y08otyAxkA4
-
M.K.Davis looks at the thumb motion on the Patterson film subject.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-WfwhfSISw
-
M.K.Davis Discusses a Mysterious Object in the Patterson Bigfoot Film.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=161&v=tGPcqbsLkiU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=21&v=CqR-fkwpDFM
-
Blevins best proof of Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot is real .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NH8n_w_U9UU
-
Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Film- Bill Munns Analysis .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MKUwdHex1Zs

Arm-leg-proportions-Bigfoot-patterson.jpg
Height-Bigfoot-patterson.jpg
Height-Bigfoot-Patterson-human-comparison.jpg
Big-foot-Patterson-height-90.73-inches.jpg
Weight-Bigfoot-patterson.jpg
Profie-Bigfoot-Patterson.jpg
head-profile-skull-bigfoot-face-patterson.jpg

Patty: An Exploration of the Sasquatch Seen in the Patterson/Gimlin
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awcyw1AwaXg
-
You want proof its real? In 1968 20th Century Fox released the first Planet of the Apes. 20th Century Fox wasnt exactly a 2nd rate studio at the time and Charlton Heston and Roddy McDowell weren't exactly B film actors. In other words this was a BIG BUDGET film. And NOT IN ONE SCENE did they produce a costume that even comes CLOSE to what we saw in the PGfilm, not even close! In 2001 Fox REMADE the film and didnt have a costume that was as good as the 1967 PG film. The PG film is as good as it gets.
http://bigfootevidence.blogspot.com/2011/11/breakdown-of-patterson-gimlin-footage.html

Bigfoot-Patterson-Homo-Erectus.gif

Above reconstructed face of early fossil man Homo erectus (Pithecanthropus erectus) looking very Yak-like superimposed over the face of the Patterson Bigfoot, showing a striking similarity.
http://www.cryptozoonews.com/bigfoot-face/
The scientific name Pithecanthropus erectus, a name derived from Greek and Latin roots meaning upright ape-man.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Java_Man
Pithecanthropus erectus - former genus of primitive apelike men now Homo erectus
hominid - a primate of the family Hominidae

Hominidae-images.jpg

Above images left to right, 1. drawing of early fossil man Pithecanthropus erectus, 2. Stacy Brown thermal night image (with a FLIR Scout thermal imager) from a video of a distant (just over 120 feet away) moving shape in the piney woods of the Torreya State Park near the Apalachicola river in a very thickly wooded area in the Florida Panhandle on May 8, 2012, sometime between midnight and 1 am as seen on Finding Bigfoot of Animal Planet. Calculations of the creature’s size is somewhere around 8.5 feet tall, and have a shoulder width of about 4 feet (more than 2x that of an average adult man), and the steps are ridiculously long (5 feet 8 inches). 3. drawing of a Yak (early man) in Oahspe, calculations of the Yak’s size is 8.5 feet tall, and a chest width 2x that of an average 6 foot tall modern man. 4. a photo of something in the woods that appears to have a very long arm and slope to back that was seen pulling on trees as it speeds through the woods. All 4 images seem to show a hominidae with very long arms, down to knees, much longer than a modern man (Homo sapiens sapiens).
The average man in the United States is 5-foot 10-inches tall, His shoulder width is 18-1/4 inches.
wiki.answers.com › ... › Statistical Information and Demographics

Notice in the Stacy Brown FLIR still frame of the figure and close-up of the head (at the :59 to 1:08 mark of the video above) you can see the spine of the humanoid creature connects with the skull at the back, holding the head at an angle same as with the Yak of Oahspe and the fossills of Australopithecus or Homo erectus. This is different from a modern human (Homo sapiens) where the spine connects with the skull underneath and near the center, holding the head firmly upright.

Bobo-Brown-Bigfoot-reenactment.jpg

Finding Bigfoot episode had a side by side comparison with Bobo (James "BoBo" Fay above) who is close to NFL Lineman size to the humanoid shape in the Brown thermal video. Bobo is 6 feet 4 inches tall. The creature was clearly much taller than Bobo when behind the tree and out in the open it made Bobo look like a twig. The creature covered the same distance from tree to cover in one natural step. It took Bobo two very exaggerated and clumsy steps to cover same distance.

At Facebook.com/findbigfoot we believe that Bigfoot (Sasquatch) has been caught watching kids, ATVs, campfires in a backyard adjoining a forest or a wooded river. Habituation and observation of rural humans and their children is part of a great number of the sighting record.
http://www.facebook.com/notes/bigfoot/-top-68-sasquatch-videosfilms-of-all-time-plus-unrated-yet-to-be-seen-videos-and/128848930465096
-
Review of Tribal Bigfoot
This is the best book I have read concerning Bigfoot sightings and information. So professional and so well written...I could not put it down...
http://www.amazon.com/Tribal-Bigfoot-David-Paulides/dp/0888396872
-
Yellowstone National Park (Arapaho: Henihco'oo or Héetíhco'oo)[4] is a national park located primarily in the U.S. state of Wyoming, although it also extends into Montana and Idaho.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowstone_National_Park
-
Oahspe God's First Book: Chapter XXIV:12. named Arapanseekasoodativhatapanagooshhootlabanasee [Arapa-seekasoodativhatapanagooshhootlabanasee, ancestor of Arapa-ho and Algonquin tribes. The Arapa-- tribes took their name from Arapanseekasoodativhatapanagooshhootlabanasee just as Shoshone tribes took their name from Shoshone.
Oahspe God's First Book: Chapter XXIV:15. And these took the name of the tribe of Ara, the which name survived one thousand seven hundred and fifty years. And their people were tens of thousands. [The Arapa-- tribes took their name from Ara].
The greater Yellowstone region, which surrounds the national park, is home to the Eastern Shoshone and Northern Arapaho tribes who reside on the Wind River Indian Reservation.
http://getawaytips.azcentral.com/yellowstone-native-american-festivals-5015.html
-
There is an unknown predator in our forests.
Children camping with their parents in Yosemite, Yellowstone, and a dozen of other parks throughout the USA and Canada, disappeared suddenly in one minute of distraction of their guardians, as if a predator was watching from the cover of the trees, choosing his time. Hundred of volunteers searching the woods, with park authorities, canine teams, even army personnel and FBI investigators, were often late in finding the child far from the place of disappearance, his clothes turned out, shoes missing, sometimes naked in the cold forest, or up the mountain, or in a creek bed.
http://www.amazon.com/Missing-411-Western-United-States-Canada/dp/1466216298
-
Oahspe First Book of God chapter XXV:
16. In the High North lay the kingdom of Olegalla, the land of giants, the place of yellow rocks and high spouting waters (geysers). It was Olegalla who gave away his kingdom, the great city of Powafuchawowitchahavagganeabba, with the twenty-four tributary cities spread along the valley of Anemoosagoochakakfuela [Yellowstone Valley --Ed.].
"land of giants", "the place of yellow rocks and high spouting waters (geysers)", "along the valley of Anemoosagoochakakfuela [Yellowstone Valley --Ed.]"
Here Oahspe speaks of (human) giants in the Yellowstone National Park area (thousands of years ago, are they still around?). Are the "giants" of Yellowstone that Oahspe spoke of Bigfoots (Sasquatch)?
-
Sas·quatch: a large, hairy creature that walks on two feet like a man and that some people claim to have seen in the northwestern U.S. and western Canada.
Definition of SASQUATCH: a hairy creature like a human being reported to exist in the northwestern United States and western Canada and said to be a primate between 6 and 15 feet (1.8 and 4.6 meters) tallcalled also bigfoot.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sasquatch

yellowstone-national-park-map.jpg
Yellowstone-National-Park-Wyoming.jpg
Bigfoot-wyhotspot_redbox.jpg

The Wyoming Location  
The BFRO has identified a location to recommend to all amateur and professional videographers. The location is along the road from Cody, Wyoming to Yellowstone National Park.
An individual report location listed in database indicates where one or more bigfoots were sighted or heard at one time in the past. Patterns of reports can indicate where bigfoots might be seen in the future. The location recommended here is one where a bigfoot is very likely to be seen again in the future, due to a pattern of past reports.
The two-part criteria for this recommendation is:
1) The location has a pattern of credible reports suggesting future daylight opportunities for footage, where
2) Several photographers would be able to seek footage simultaneously without disturbing or detering the bigfoot(s).
http://www.bfro.net/wy_hot_spot.htm
Notice the maps above, the Wyoming Bigfoot hot spot (red box) is right next to the (big) Yellowstone Lake in Yellowstone National Park. Also the Misssing 411 Wyoming cluster of unexplained missing people (map below) is in the same area as Yellowstone National Park and Yellowstone Lake, which is the same area as the Bigfoot hot spot (for sightings) and is the same as the land of giants in Oahspe First Book of God chapter XXV:16. Is
it a coincidence that all this information lines up to the same area? The Missing 411 Wyoming cluster happened from the years 1942 to 1997, 61 to 116 years AFTER Oahspe was typed.  Yellowstone, Wyoming Bigfoot cluster sightings are documented from the years 1976 - 2002,  95 to 121 years after Oahspe.

Wyoming-Missing-411-clusters.jpg
Dennis-Johnson-Yellowstone.jpg
Bigfoot-shelters-lean-to.jpg

Is Bigfoot a Ghost or a Creature?
http://dreamcoin.blogspot.com/2012/06/is-bigfoot-ghost-or-creature.html
OAHSPE: Book of Apollo CHAPTER X:
12. Jehovih said:
I have given power to spirits of the newly dead to clothe themselves from the atmosphere with corporeal semblances of flesh and blood.

Spirits or angels can do this (clothe themselves from the atmosphere with corporeal semblances of flesh and blood) at anytime, not just during the time of Se'mu as the hosts of Sethantes did 72-73,000 years ago.

The Top Ten Best GHOST PHOTOGRAPHS Ever Taken
http://theknightshift.blogspot.com/2005/10/top-ten-best-ghost-photographs-ever.html
Best Ghost Pictures Ever Taken
Some fascinating pictures that will convince you of the reality of ghosts.
http://paranormal.about.com/od/ghostphotos/ig/Best-Ghost-Photos/

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Art imitates life? An advanced hominid from another world?
''Predator'' in the Forest/Missing 411(2016)
A CREDIBLE EYE WITNESS TO A FOREST PREDATOR 25 FEET ABOVE GROUND IN THE TREES:
Last night, David Paulides was the guest on Coast to Coast. George Knapp was the host. Great interview. Paulides was on to discuss his new book Missing 411: Hunters. During that interview, Knapp and Paulides discussed the strange experience of Jan Maccabee. She is married to UFO researcher Dr. Bruce Macabee. In that interview, Paulides describes a shimmering, predator like being Ms. Macabee saw -- and photographed -- while out in the woods in his article, complete with images, “Predator in the Forest” or Jan's Weird Experience. The following is from Maccabee's article:
    Suddenly the woods went quiet.  Noise stopped. The silence was “weird.”  It so surprised and unnerved her that she wrote a text message to her friend (thereby documenting this event): Something is wrong.  The woods just went to a dead silence. No squirrels, no birds, no crickets.  Is odd!  (6:23 PM EDT) She thought a coyote or maybe a black panther or some predator animal caused the quiet as she knows (as hunters know) that when a predator such as a bear, for example, enters an area the other animals tend to become quiet.  Then she became aware that a weird visual “effect” was moving rightward across her field of view at an apparent distance of maybe fifteen to twenty feet.  She described it as if looking through "saran wrap."  Perhaps a more apt comparison would be like looking at a mirage above a hot road.  She compared this distortion of the scene as being somewhat like the effect of the invisible creature in the PREDATOR movie!  This distortion was at a higher altitude than her 15 ft above the ground, perhaps about 25 ft above the ground..  She took her glasses off and rubbed her right eye thinking at first she had a floater (a mote in the eye).  But after rubbing it was still there and not a floater. (Bruce Maccabee)
http://orangeorb.blogspot.com/2016/08/more-missing-411-high-strangeness.html
"I can't find a single track", "They never left here"...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bNdqt9SdYa4
 
http://www.canammissing.com/i/Map.jpghttp://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/map/xusa3.gif
There is something in those trees Predator Quote.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u4R4JuLh47U
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSV4zIapS9U
Notice how missing 411 cluster map is very similar to the USA National Forests map
The Predator that moves in the trees fits the Missing 411 map where there is a wilderness of trees.
Where there is no Missing clusters (middle of USA) there is no trees (no forests, flat open grassland or deserts).

https://dejareviewer.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/the-predators-camouflage-lets-him-sneak-attack-and-then-disappear.jpg
http://www.blogcdn.com/blog.moviefone.com/media/2010/07/predator-3.jpg

There was a UFO sighting about a mile away at Shawnee High School.
-
Oahspe mentions advanced Hominids (both good and bad) that travel above the ground and are capable of making themselves invisible (cloaking technology) to human eyes and carrying humans away.
cloak
verb
gerund or present participle: cloaking.
  1. dress in a cloak.
    "she cloaked herself in black"
From Oahspe:
"hundreds of full-grown people being carried by the angels"
"angels carrying the child"
"had attained to adeptship, so that the angels could carry him up and down"
-

-
Any comments about Oahspe or this website? Email Me. I look forward to talking to you about Oahspe and this website
-
"I am glad for anyone who is appreciative of my website and puts a value on my hard work, thank you."
 

If you find this information helpful to you please feel free to make a $20 dollar donation and help support my research.  Thank You.

If you want to donate more than $20 enter the amount here. Thank you for supporting my work.

With a $20 or more donation I am also avaliable for a 30 minute phone consultation where I will answer questions you may have. Email me or leave a comment if you want a phone consultation.

Enter supporting content here