Home, Cycles, Astrophysics, Human developmentAngels mating with physical humansMore science, Astronomy, PhysicsMore science 2 Chemistry, Physics, AstronomyHigher Advanced Knowledge of OahspeOptical Network Communications - Facial recognition - ZodiacWeather, Climate, Dark Matter, Airborne PathogensExtrasolar planets, CEVORKUM, Light speedGeology - Pole-shift - Radiometric dating-A'jiSolar-Stellar Life Cycle - End of Earth - Death and DiseaseBiology, Primary Vortex, Life, Computing, QuantumPhysics - Light - SoundPhysics - Magnetism - GravityThe Creator - The Father- and ManHuman origins - Pygmies - I'hinsHominidae - animal-manEarly Man - Races of Man - AnthropologyDinosaurs, Man, fossils, early EarthReligious History, Chinvat Bridge, Archeology, RaceConfucius, Po, China, Jaffeth & Caucasian originThe Great Pyramid of Ancient Egypt and ThothmaMathematical knowledge of Israelites and sub-Saharan AfricansHell, Knots, Flash devices, Riot controlBiblical flood and the sinking of PanThe Constantine BibleLooeamong, Constantine, and The Roman EmpireThe Bible, Jesus, Joshu, Essenes, AnunnakiColumbus, Catholics, Conquistadors, Protestants, CrusadesQuakers and inner lightThomas PaineUS HistoryKosmon cycle, people, ancestry & SHALAMSubatomic particles - String Theory - Quantum - GUTMatter - Anti-Matter, Galaxies and CosmologyWalter Russell Cosmogony and EinsteinAerospace engineering, space-ships, space travelSpace clouds, Earth travel, ORACHNEBUAHGALAHTables of prophecy and historyThe BeastORACHNEBUAHGALAH CHARTS Cycles & ProphecyAngels, universe, genetics, Loo'isNordic Aliens-Angels, Greys, Neoteny and ManPower of Attraction - Visualization - Spiritual giftsSpiritual message - UFOs - EthereansCosmic Consciousness, cycles, human behavior, ZodiacCycles, Predictions, Earth events, A'jiNebula, Earth's atmosphere, heat & cold, eclipse, prophecyTrue PropheciesPredictionsDirect Inspiration, Walter RussellMisc. vortex, matter, periodic table, solar system, fractals, pi and cMisc. 2, E=mc2, geometry, pi and alphabet codes, chemical elementsMisc. 3, Sacred mathematics, geometry, music, harmonics, cosmology, cycles, fractals, chaosMisc. 4 life and planets, E-O-IH and geometry, DNA, facial recognitionMisc. 5 human DNA, neuroscience, 9-8-5, 33, creativity, solar powerProphecy, Pan, Harvest & DNAMagnetospheres - Solar planetary vortex - 3D HologramsEther Vortex PhysicsLanguage - Symbols - Pictographs - Creator's nameTornados, name vs concept, flat earth theory, UV-light, sympathetic resonance, spiritsTae and facial recognition, Ham, Shem, Guatama, I'huan, Ghan racesMathematics, Reality, primary 3, E-O-IH, Cevorkum, EthereansOriginal Israelites and JewsIsraelites I'huans Ghans Adinkra TesseractETHICAL TEACHINGS OF OAHSPE, Government on EarthAngelic star travelers, Human origins, racesAstrophysics, OpticsVisitors and CommentsDonation

"...out of his world-wide travels he returned with the solid, practical conviction of the brotherhood of man. Many subscribe to this theory, but to John Newbrough it was a conviction, and he practiced it to the extent that the blackest negro was as much his brother as the fairest Anglo-Saxon; ...Page 126 of SEVEN YEARS THAT CHANGED THE WORLD, 1941 - 1948 (1940) by Wing Anderson.
-
"iesu; one who can hear the voice of the Great Spirit" - Oahspe.
The state of hearing the voice of the Great Spirit is Iesu (Jesus).
-

If you don't believe Oahspe's version of the races of man how do you explain Ardipithecus ramidus fossils, Australopithecus fossils, Homo erectus fossils, and Homo florensis fossils?
How did Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus, Homo erectus, and Homo florensis come to exist on earth?
Did Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus, and Homo erectus have the same ability as modern Homo sapiens to understand spiritual things?


Masonic Racism in Oahspe?
Angels mating with physical humans?
Whites from I'hins?
Blacks from A'su?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vx00tjYUkc

-
On this webpage I will address the Youtube video above.
-
Another person back in the late 1990s and early 2000s who went from pro Oahspe to anti-Oahspe, anti-Masons, and anti-Newbrough was the owner and author of Oahspe.com (she became quite hostile to Oahspe and Oahspeans, calling Oahspeans "cultists").
Oahspe Book of Es, Daughter of Jehovih Chapter XIII:
The republic established.
1. Es said: Since three hundred years, the loo'is of God's allotment to the earth, had been providing the generations of men unto the coming work of God.
2. And through these had God, Jehovih's Son, raised up one thousand two hundred men, to be directly under the inspiration of the second resurrection, for establishing an emancipated government for mortals.
3. And these one thousand two hundred men were raised to grades above sixty, and some of them to eighty.
4. Chief of these men raised up by God, to establish the foundation of Jehovih's kingdom with mortals, were the following, all of whom stood above grade eighty, to wit:
5. Paine, Jefferson, Adams, Franklin, Caroll, Hancock and Washington
.
6. Into the hands of these seven men did Jehovih, through God, His Son, place the leadership of the mortal hosts; and they were under the guidance of Jehovih's Lord, Yotahiza.
Oahspe above states that Jehovih through God, His Son and
Jehovih's Lord, Yotahiza directly inspired Adams, Franklin, Hancock and Washington who were Freemasons above spiritual grade 80 (extremly high):
John Ballou Newbrough was a 33rd degree Mason. Thomas Paine was pro Freemasonry.

Benjamin Franklin, one of America’s founding fathers, was initiated in 1731. Franklin was not only a member but a Master Mason.
https://www.enkivillage.org/33rd-degree-masons.html
On this day in 1753, George Washington became a Master Mason, the highest rank in Freemasonry. His promotion occurred at the masonic lodge in his hometown of Fredericksburg, Virginia. He was 21 at the time ...
https://www.politico.com/story/2015/08/this-day-in-politics-aug-4-1753-120939
 
Oahspe Book of Es, Daughter of Jehovih Chapter XIII:
7. And the Lord caused Paine, to proclaim the new doctrines, as against Looeamong and the sacred books, on which the inquisitions had been carried out.
8. These, then, were the doctrines of Paine, inspired by the Lord, Jehovih's Son, to wit:
9. One, the Creator, who is Almighty, matchless in wisdom, truth, power and unity of purpose; the author of all things, on the earth and on all other worlds, seen and unseen.
10. That the soul of man is immortal and everlasting, and shall ultimately attain to peace and joy in the heavens of the Almighty.
11. That, according to man's good or evil deeds, words, thoughts and actions whilst on earth, even so shall he inherit in heaven, light or darkness, joy or unhappiness.
12. That all the world is my country, and the same right alike to all men.
13. To do good, with all of one's wisdom and strength, is the highest religion.
14. That man hath a natural right, above all kings, priests and sacred writings, to serve his Creator in his own way.
15. That this is an age of reason, in which all men should be inspired, to read and think, and judge with their own judgment and not through any priest or church or Savior.
16. That the doctrine of a Savior is unjust; that no honest man should accept another's dying for him.
17. That the so-called sacred books are not the writings of the Creator; that their multiplicity of defects prove them to have been manufactured by corruptible authors.

18. That, in practice, the said sacred books have been used by unprincipled priests to promote wars, inquisitions, tyranny and destruction.

19. That man should rise up in his might to embrace his Creator, by the practice of good works, and by promoting brotherly love toward all men; and by charity and independence elicit the protection, the pride and the glory of the Almighty.

20. The doctrines of God, Paine proclaimed publicly; and they were printed, and circulated amongst the inhabitants of Guatama.

21. And it came to pass, that they fell into the hands of such men and women as had been previously prepared by God to receive them. And these people applauded the new doctrines to so great an extent that the colonies repudiated the Divine right (Divan laws) of kings to govern without the consent of the governed.

22. Looeamong, the false Kriste, perceived the design of God, Jehovih's Son, and immediately sent down to the earth, to Guatama, two thousand angel warriors, to overthrow Paine's doctrines, and to precipitate the colonies into war against the home government in western Uropa.

Page 377 to 383 of Thomas Paine Apostle of Freedom by Jack Fruchtman. Jr. (1994):
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1995-01-11-ls-18624-story.html
Although Paine returned to military issues after his final move to the United States in 1802, it was through Bonneville's influence that he now moved away from the political sphere and toward Theophilanthrophy and most likely Freemasonry...[Page 377]. But Bonneville did not advocate revolutionary violence. ...Freemasonry, with its emphasis on light and enlightment, on Illuminist ideas, became a component of the ideology of the Social Circle
  Illuminism took its name from the way in which the sun radiated its light to distant circles....The hope was that the principles that underlay Freemasonry, magic, and the Revolution would mingle to improve humanity. Many of these ideas originated in the theories of Illuminism.
  Illuminism originated in Bavaria, specifically in the ideas of Adam Weishaupt. Weishaupt founded the Order of Illuminati in the spring of 1776 at the University of Ingolstadt, where he was a professor of canon, or religious, law. Weishaupt thought a person could achieve a heightened state of awareness to the extant where it was possible to see beyond the simple reality of everyday life. Once a person reached that point, he joined the Illuminati. For the Illuminati, the relationship between God and man, between the divine and the secular, was so closely intertwined that they became one. Condemed by the Roman Catholic Church because it invited no priestly intervention or bishoptic or popish intermediary. Illuminism was dissolved by the Bavarian government in 1785. In France, the situation was different. The clergy had lost its standing during the Revolution, and hence could not condemn the heresy. In these circumstances, the German-speaking Bonneveille became an Illuminist under the influence of Johann Christian Bode, a follower of Weishaupt.
  Into this picture stepped Thomas Paine. Bonneville most likely introduced Paine to the Social Circle and the principles of Freemasonry and Theophilanthropism. For Bonneville, "man is God," and he was to "become angelic" as universal brotherhood spanned the world, ideas that fitted perfectly into Paine's universalism, ...In January of 1797, Paine and several other people founded a society known as the Theophilanthropists. ...The idea was that this group could worship God according to the principles Paine had advanced in The Age of Reason. Theophilanthropism ...It was one of the first ethical societies in the world. Paine never attended a religious service, not even a Quaker meeting, but now there was a community of believers, the Theophilanthropists, to which he could belong. ...Paine...He explained the word Theophilanthropy as a compound of "three Greek words, signifying God, Love, and Man." [God = Creator = 9, Love = harmony = 8, Man = central focus = balance = 5]. ...Theophilanthropism ...Its beliefls were grounded in the affective
spiritulality of the Illuminati that Bonneville had brought from Germany to Paris
. Theophilanthropism became the means for Paine to achieve a renewed spirit. ...Theophilanthropists believe in the existence of God and the immortality of the soul. Paine put the tenents of Theophilanthropism in a manual of some sixty pages, which were a distillation of the beliefs previously declared in The Age of Reason. ...In a volume proposed by the Theophilanthropists for publication, no biblical scripture was included. Instead they chose from the writings of Greek poet Theigbes, ...and from the writings of Confucius and other Chinese poets. Their goal was to heighten the spirituality of all people, to bring them to harmony with themselves, their fellow human beings, the universe, and ultimately God. Paine told Erskine, a soul that enjoyed life after death in a spiritual union with God, the Creator of the Universe. ...After Paine returned to America, he set down his ideas about these matters in an essay on the origins of Freemasonry.
---------
    Ah Ha – So Pike was a racist, no wonder you don’t want this to come to light.
No, this claim by Davis and Fleming was without documentation or proof and their published accusations have no supporting evidence that can be validated.
Fleming wrote four monographs, one dissertation, and two articles on the Ku Klux Klan. Only in his Introduction to the 1905 reprint of Lester and Wilson’s Ku Klux Klan does he claim that Albert Pike was chief judicial officer of the Klan. This is the first published claim that Pike was a Klansman; it appeared fourteen years after Pike’s death, but this accusation was not supported by any evidence, and to date, further research into primary source material revealed nothing that would support this claim.
Well maybe Pike wasn’t a racist, but I read where the Freemasons as a group are a racist organization? You don’t have blacks in many of your Lodges, especially in the South? Doesn’t that show that you are a racist group?
The first and perhaps most important point to make is that Freemasonry has no bar to membership based on race, religion or creed. Petitions for membership do not ask the race of the petitioner, and it would be considered completely wrong to do so. Indeed, it is un-Masonic conduct for a Freemason to vote to reject an applicant for one of these reasons – it simply is inconsistent with Masonic principles.
But the fact is that most Blacks have joined the Prince Hall Lodges and, over the years, very few Blacks were admitted to certain non-Prince Hall Grand Lodges. This is not the case today, as hundreds of thousands of Black, Native American. Hispanic and Oriental Freemasons can testify.
But there are no blacks that belong to the Grand Lodge of Alabama, as an example, how do you explain that?
There is a schism in Freemasonry dating back over 200 years to when “Prince Hall” Masons, who are African-Americans, declared themselves independent. This schism is similar to the division of the United Methodist Church from the A.M.E. C.M.E. and United Methodist Church from the A.M.E., S.M.E. and A.M.E. Zion churches or the National Baptists from the American and Southern Baptists.
In each of these three examples the organizations are working to repair the damages of centuries of separation. In the case of Freemasonry, the separation between Prince Hall and non-Prince Hall Lodges is disappearing as the two organizations are extending formal recognition to each other and the Brethren from each organization are visiting each other in their respective Lodges. This process has proceeded at a steady pace for nearly ten years.
https://grandlodgeofvirginia.org/myths-of-freemasonry/

Misinformation or outright lies about Freemasonry are just incredible. Indeed, we suspect that it is more than misinformation; it is disinformation ...the Internet has made the problem worse.
In the past, a person had to search hard to find one of these anti-Masonic tracts. Today anti-Masonic ranting is just a couple of mouse clicks away. The problem is that with so much anti-Masonic material available on the Internet a good deal of this misinformation is believed....
Many non-Masons are as likely to stumble across the anti-Masonic sites and read the incorrect information about Freemasonry as they are to visit the sites that can provide them accurate information. Worse yet, they often cannot distinguish the good information from the bad, the truth from the lies.
https://grandlodgeofvirginia.org/myths-of-freemasonry/
From its earliest days, Freemasonry has been concerned with the care of orphans, the sick, and the aged.
Shriners Hospitals for Children is a network of 22 pediatric hospitals in the U.S., Canada and Mexico providing specialized care for orthopedic conditions, burns, spinal cord injuries and cleft lip and palate. All services are provided, regardless of the patient’s ability to pay.
https://grandlodgeofvirginia.org/charity/

-
Oahspe Book Of Jehovih's Kingdon On Earth, THE BOOK OF SHALAM : Chapter I:
9. Jehovih answered Tae, saying: Go, seek, and bring out of Uz orphan babes and castaway infants and foundlings.
10. And these shall by thy colony, which shall be My new kingdom on earth.
-
◄ Matthew 19:14 ► of the Bible:
But Jesus said, "Let the children come to me, and don't try to stop them! People who are like these children belong to God's kingdom." - Contemporary English Version
https://biblehub.com/matthew/19-14.htm
-
SHALAM A BRIEF HISTORY
Shalam was to be the initial colony of babies from which a new and better race would evolve. And so it came about that in the summer of 1884, two men with heritage of great dreams set out in quest of the "unoccupied land by the river" of OAHSPE prophesy. The tall man, fasting to purification of mind and body, was Dr. John B. Newbrough of New York City, world traveler, mystic, physician and philanthropist, a man well known in America and English spiritualist circles. Newbrough was accompanied by Joseph Grill, his longtime friend.
A few children had accompanied the group from the east in 1884, and these children lived in the "common room" of the Fraternum. Other infants came to Shalam, and the babies played in a screened pavilion until the Children's building was completed. Small tots whisked around the lilacs in the sunshine of the patio. It was a healthy life.
Newbrough had received a letter from Masonic friends in Las Cruces, New Mexico, telling him of land available in that area.
http://web.archive.org/web/20150123144427/http://www.angelfire.com/in4/ufk/pages/shalam.htm
-
Children were "'gathered-up' from foundling homes; handed over by police sergeants; and left in Faithist depositories". Newbrough and his wife traveled as far as Kansas City, San Francisco, New Orleans, and Chicago to gather children. The children, from a variety of races, were pampered and treated with love and kindness.[19]
-
There were gathered between 1887 and 1900 some fifty small children who represented "the babes the world would not have." They ranged from African to Chinese. But all were beloved under the tenets of the Faithists.
https://archive.org/stream/newmexicohistori33univrich/newmexicohistori33univrich_djvu.txt
-
Did Newbrough put Masonic symbolism in OAHSPE?  No.
The Masons borrowed many ancient symbols that had been used by many religions for thousands of years. Thus, some Faithist symbolism is seen today in the work of the Masons.
An important teaching of Faithism is Free Will, and thus Faithists have responsibility for their decisions. Free Will is something that students of OAHSPE have, but it is also something that students of OAHSPE need to grant to others. Faithists who disagree with the Book of Saphah have the Free Will to make their own spiritual choices; and Free Will should be extended to those Faithists who find meaning in the study of Saphah.
https://universalfaithistsofkosmon.org/f/kosmon-voice-e-news-august-2019
-
There have been racist Christians (especially in the south-Bible belt) but that does not mean Christianity as a whole is racist.
Jim Crow was the name of the racial caste system which operated primarily, but not exclusively in southern
and border states, between 1877 and the mid-1960s. Jim Crow was more than a series of rigid anti-Black laws.
It was a way of life. Under Jim Crow, African Americans were relegated to the status of second class citizens.
Jim Crow represented the legitimization of anti-Black racism. Many Christian ministers and theologians taught
that Whites were the Chosen people
, Blacks were cursed to be servants, and God supported racial segregation.
There are racist Masons but that does not mean Masons as a whole is racists.
Georgia freemasons at loggerheads over admission of black man to lodge
Although there are other Masons of colour in Georgia, including Asians and Hispanics, some members were disturbed to encounter a black man and laid a complaint that he did not belong.
"There were ill-informed brethren who were surprised that there was an African-American brother," David Llewellyn, a Freemason and lawyer for the Atlanta lodge, told the New York Times, "and some of them were very upset".
The stipulations to join the Masons are that members must be male, not slaves, of good character and have faith in a supreme being but no mention is made of racial origin.
The grand master, or leader of the Masons in Georgia, J Edward Jennings Jr, sent an email to members saying that Marshall was a legitimate member and should be treated as such. But that did not quell the row.
But the complaint has met with ridicule in part because there are largely black Masonic lodges in the US as well as in African countries such as Ghana.
"There's deep-rooted racism in the leadership," he said. "I've had many calls from white Masons to say they cannot understand why things are this way."
Marshall told the Associated Press that while he is disillusioned by the attitudes of some of his fellow Masons he has not lost faith in the organisation.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/jul/03/atlanta-georgia-freemasons-race
FREEMASONRY AND RACISM.
Recent research carried out by the Curator of the Grand Lodge of Scotland Museum and Library, Robert Cooper, has established that the Masons blazed a trail in the field of race relations – a trail they pursue to this day.
 “The principals of Freemasonry”, said Cooper, “dictate that there can be no discrimination on the grounds of race and this is but one example.” The picture and many others, also showing black Freemasons, are held by the Grand Lodge Museum in the Masons' George Street headquarters. “Thank goodness for the camera” said Cooper. “Because Freemasonry per se is not interested in anyone’s religion, race, or politics our records contain no details as to the race etc. of the individuals concerned. These images show that Scottish Freemasonry has been admitting black men since, at least, the invention of photography.”
But further research revealed that admission of black men into Freemasonry had been taking place even earlier. “More than 100 years before slavery was officially abolished black men were being admitted into the fraternity,” explained Mark Tabbart, Curator of Fraternal Collections at the Museum of National Heritage in Lexington Massachusetts. “This is a story little known to non-Freemasons and it shows how egalitarian Freemasonry was and continues to be” said Tabbert.
Most people are simply unaware of the egalitarian nature of Freemasonry,” said Cooper, “when one is aware that there are Scottish Lodges all over the world, including Africa and the Indian subcontinent, all of them admitting natives of each country regardless of race it shows how ridiculous is any suggestion of racism within Scottish Freemasonry.”

Photograph above shows several black men after having been Initiated into Freemasonry in Lodge Waverley, No.597, on 2nd May 1904.
https://www.facebook.com/GrandLodgeScotland/posts/scottish-freemasonry-accused-of-racism-freemasonry-admits-men-regardless-of-race/2001011756651062/
-

Oahspe Book Of Jehovih Chapter VI:
3. I spake in the firmament, and My voice reached to the uttermost places....
Behold! A new world have I created; come ye and enjoy it. Yea, ye shall learn from it how it was with other worlds in ages past.
http://oahspe.blogspot.com/2007/12/book-of-jehovih.html

It is often assumed by readers of Oahspe that because Oahspe says the I'hins were white and yellow that they were white people or Caucasians and because Oahspe says the Druks (75% A'su) were brown and black they were black people or Negroes. The highest Image software recognition (with mathematical algorithms) matches to the original I'hin of Oahspe (drawn by Newbrough under angelic control) are between 81% and 85% and include people of caucasian, african-american, and east-asian ancestry, and the highest facial recognition matches to A'su (from 81% to 85%) are of nordic and northwestern european ancestry.
 
The I'hins not only got their short height but also got their light skin color from their parents who had died in infancy. Infants, fetus, newborn babies have lighter skin because in the womb there is darkness and no exposure to radiation.
-
9. Why is a fetus’s eye color usually blue at week 32 post-fertilization, regardless of the permanent color? Eye color is usually blue because pigmentation is not fully developed until the eyes receive light exposure.
Even the light colored eyes of the I'hins were a result of the fetal/infant state their parents had died in on other corporeal worlds.
According to Oahspe these were the angels who were tempted and bred with the first race of humans to produce the short people called the I'hins.
-
The angels who had died in infancy or fetal state on other corporeal worlds were more likely to have very light skin color, with silky and often lightly-colored straight hair, and eye color usually blue.
 
Notice the lanugo (downy hair) on the 24 week fetus below: 
Pygmies are born covered with a thick lanugo, or fetal hair, which is usually blond to reddish,
and when retained in adults turns dark brown.
"the childlike characteristics of pygmies, including fetuslike lanugo and broad noses".
-
OAHSPE: Book of Judgment XXXII:
6. ..Half the people, born into the world, including still-births and abortions, die in infancy. Therefore, there are a thousand million angel infants fetaled ...
7. These angels never obtain objective knowledge of the corporeal earth, but are compelled to learn subjectively earthly things through mortals ...
"die in infancyincludes still-births and abortions = angel fetus, prenatal 
-
Pygmies’ heads are usually oval to globular, like those of infants ...
Main article: San people
Tobias said that there are "infantile" features in the cranial morphology of Bushmen.[57]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoteny_in_humans 
-
Oahspe Book of Jehovih: Chapter VI
14. There alighted upon the new earth millions of angels from heaven; but many of them
had never fulfilled a corporeal life, having died in infancy
, and these angels comprehended
not procreation nor corporeal life.
17. And I said: Go ye forth and partake of all that is on the earth; but partake ye not
of the tree of life, lest in that labor ye become procreators and as if dead to the
heavens whence ye came.
18. But those who had never learned corporeal things, being imperfect in wisdom,
comprehended not Jehovih's words, and they dwelt with the Asuans, and were tempted,
and partook of the fruit of the tree of life; and lo and behold they saw their own nakedness.
And there was born of the first race (Asu) a new race called man
; and Jehovih took the
earth out of the travail of se'mu and the angels gave up their corporeal bodies.

Genetic evidence for origins.

African pygmy populations are genetically diverse and extremely divergent from all other human populations, suggesting they have an ancient indigenous lineage. Their uniparental markers represent the second-most ancient divergence right after those typically found in Khoisan peoples..[19]-

Pygmy peoples - Wikipedia

Oahspe First Book of the First Lords: Chapter II:
4. The I'hins were white and yellow, but the Druks were brown and black; the I'hins were small and slender, but the Druks were tall and stout.
OAHSPE: The Lords' Fifth Book Chapter III: 4. Of all colors (black, white, yellow, copper, red and brown) were the tribes of Ham; nevertheless, they were I'hins (Faithists), having flat nails and short arms, and of such as desired to acquire knowledge.

The white and yellow skin color of most I'hins in Oahspe may be due to the underdeveloped "infancy genes" that the I'hins inherited from their Angel parents who had died in infancy on other corporeal worlds, this may also explain their fine straight hair. This may also explain the yellowish brown skin of some pygmy tribes and their usually blond to reddish lanugo, a fine, downy hair found on infants. Many bi-racial kids are very fair, have very light skin color at birth but they darken in skin tone every year. Some bi-racial children are as white as could be when born, but grew darker as time went on.  As for hair, many bi-racial children are born with straight hair, but as they reached puberty, their hair was really tightly curled.

https://s11.postimg.cc/lqmdmzvir/Melanesian-_I_hin-hair.jpg
Oahspe - The Lord's Fifth Book: Chapter V:
12. ...their children became I'huans also, neither having the silken hair ...of the I'hins,...
Melanesians got their blonde hair from the I'hins who were white and yellow. Melanesian blond hair has been traced to an allele of TYRP1 unique to these people, and is not the same gene that causes blond hair in Caucasians.
-
Fetal Development: Baby's Hair ...
In fact, all babies — no matter your ethnicity — sport the same thin, silky and often lightly-colored hair at birth, called vellus.
http://www.whattoexpect.com/pregnancy/fetal-hair-skin-nails/

For the results below I used profile (side-view) pictures with little or no external images:
-
Above is the highest picture similarity match to the original I'hin in Oahspe, 84.88% by a white (caucasian) man.
The above result is equivalent to identical twins face matching 84% on Pictrieve:
Below is the 4th highest picture similarity match to the original I'hin in Oahspe, 81.59% by a white man.
Above African-American man with dreadlocks has the second highest similarity match (83.87%) to Original I'hin.
African-American girl above has the third highest similarity match (82.47%) to Original I'hin.
African-Americans and White Caucasians are equally represented in the top 4 similarity matches to the original I'hin.
White Caucasians finished 1st and 4th (1+4=5). African-Americans finished 2nd and 3rd (2+3 = 5).
Both White Caucasians and African-Americans top 2 similarity matches to original I'hin average (rounded off to nearest whole number) 83%.

Below Nordic and Northwestern European is the highest match to A'su:
Above Asu face recognition 84% and 81% to Nordic and Northwestern European and 73% and 72% to African
Loango (western Congo) and African Pygmy.

50 seconds into video above it says:
Angels Mating with Mortals so Whites are Descended from I'hins while Blacks are from Druks?
1 minute 12 seconds into video it says:
The argumentative proofs AGAINST angels-primates cross-breeding are along these six lines of reasoning:
(1) The geological time scale of primates that could have resembled Oahspean races does not correspond at all with that of Oahspe's.
The geological time scale above does not correspond with that of Oahspe's but genetic analysis below does correspond with a close approximation to the Oahspe story.
OAHSPE: Book of Cosmogony and Prophecy V:
21. By reversing these measurements, find the axial decrease of the earth in seventy-eight thousand years, which will be just one hundred minutes, or 3-340ths of a second annually, which is the earth's decline in speed. For which reason the first of the race of man on earth began about seventy-eight thousand years B.K.[B.K. = Before Kosmon, 78,000 years before 1848].
From David Garcia in Germany June 13, 2018:
I found an interesting article:
"Most Species Young" Study Makes Biologists Tear Their Hair Out.
“The study's most startling result, perhaps, is that nine out of 10 species on Earth today,
including humans, came into being 100,000 to 200,000 years ago.”
http://futureandcosmos.blogspot.com/2018/06/most-species-young-study-makes.html

The fossil record based on stratigraphic position shows Ardipithecus ramidus existed 55 times longer ago than Oahspe says A'su or Adam existed. The genetic analysis indicates hominids have been around for only 2.5 to only 1.25 times longer than Oahspe says A'su or Adam existed which if that is true, is a close approximation to the Oahspe story of the timeline of the origin of man on earth.
-
Both the Oahspe plate 59 OUTLINE MAP SHOWING THE LOCALITY OF PAN and the Oahspe plate Asu the First Race are "roughly scaled hand drawn scetches" as Vernon Wobschall would say.
-
https:/www.youtube.com/watch?v=5pOnyhvRRHI&t=1793s
Comparing Asu to Ardipithecus ramidus is equal to comparing Oahspe plate 59 to a Cretaceous and Early Cenozoic World Map 50 to 100 million years ago.
Oahspe says Asu lived 78,000 years ago but scientists using geologic dating methods say Ardipithecus ramidus lived 4.4 milion years ago.
Comparing plate 59 Outline Map to the time period of when Texas, Kansas and the Sahara desert was underwater is like comparing Asu to Ardipithecus ramidus.
Plate 59 Outline Map showing The locality of Pan shows the Earth 25,000 years ago, but scientists using geologic dating methods say Texas, Kansas and the Sahara desert was underwater 50 to 100 million years ago.
http://oahspestandardedition.com/OSAC/EVIDENCE_SUBMERGED_CONTINENT.html
Comparing Asu to Ardipithecus ramidus is equal to compaing Oahspe plate 59 outline map to a Early Cenozoic world map where large parts don't match.
Asu looks as similar to Ardipithecus ramidus as Oahspe plate 59 map looks to a World Map of the Early Cenozoic when Texas, Kansas and the Sahara desert was underwater.
Below is a comparison of Oahspe Plate 59 OUTLINE MAP SHOWING THE LOCALITY OF PAN and a World Map depicting the Early Cenozoic 66 million years ago (Ma).
Above red circles show underwater land areas of similarity.
-
If a person dies and his/her remains are found a thousand years later and they date the age of the rocks found next to his/her remains more than likely the rocks will be thousands or millions of years older than the lifespan of the human who died.
-
What is the average age of rocks that I find when out and about?
At the long end I'm told most rocks are 2-3bn [billion] years old at most because of plate tectonics. The earth is a bit over 4bn years old but the crust cycles most rock back down into magma before they get older than that. We have almost nothing in the geologic record older than 4bn years. Very little past 3.

https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/2b2ye0/what_is_the_average_age_of_rocks_that_i_find_when/
So if you go hiking and die next to a 2 or 3 billion year old rocks, and they date the rocks near your fossil remains you will be dated as having lived billions of years ago.
How old is your average garden stone?
Since no one else is jumping on this, I'm going to say it would depend on just where your garden is located.  The range would be several million to a few billion.

https://www.thenakedscientists.com/forum/index.php?topic=990.0
How old is the average rock you find in your backyard?
Bradai Mohammed, Licence Geology & Sedimentology, Université d'Oran Mohamed Benahmed 2 (2019)
Answered July 12, 2019
it’s really don’t have a specific time, it can be quaternary (2.58 to present million years ago) or tertiary period (66 to 2.58 million years ago) or even older, because it’s under transport, never stable as you think it may be.

https://www.quora.com/How-old-is-the-average-rock-you-find-in-your-backyard
-
...the calibration problem is not the only flaw of radiocarbon dating. As the lecture detailed, it is only accurate from about 62,000 years ago to 1,200 A.D. There is a sizable amount of time before and after that period that cannot be investigated using this method.

http://anthropology.msu.edu/anp264-ss13/2013/02/07/radiocarbon-dating-a-closer-look-at-its-main-flaws/
-
1 minute 33 seconds into the video it says:
(2) No fossils of these Oahspe races, though supposedly numbering in the millions, have ever been found.
Ardipithecus ramidus fossils, Australopithecus fossils, Homo erectus fossils, and Homo florensis fossils have been found.
-
Although Homo erectus existed for supposedly 2 million years and was spread throughout the Old World (Africa, Europe, Asia) and the southwest Pacific islands only 45 fossils of these Homo erectus, though supposedly numbering in the millions, have ever been found.
..its specimens are among the first recognisable members of the genus Homo. H. erectus was the first human ancestor to spread throughout the Old World,
There have been remains of 45 homo erectus individuals found .
..
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_erectus
If there was say ten million Homo erectus that existed at one Earth, and only 45 have been found that means:
45 divided by 10000000 = 0.0000045
100 - 0.0000045 = 99.9999955 percent of Homo erectus fossils have not been found.
-
Oahspe's drawings of the races have been called "stylized" rather than realistic but even so they are still relatively realistic when compared to anatomical reconstruction art of fossil human ancestors (see below).
58% match or similarity is considered close enough (see above) by Microsoft's TwinsOrNot.
Measured similarity between Ardipithecus ramidus and Asu pictures 60.74% (very high):
John Ballou Newbrough's drawing of Asu man looks highly accurate when compared to Ardipithecus ramidus.
Asu upright next to Ardipithecus ramidus. Both have a very similar long torso, hips, belly, chest, shoulders, neck, and head.
Asu has shorter legs and longer arms than Ardipithecus ramidus but the rest is very similar except for jaw (prognathism) and nose.
Above images with projection lines are approximate body proportions of Homo sapiens and Ardipithecus ramidus.
The figures are aligned at the crown of the head and the umbilicus to approximate a constant trunk length.
Relative to trunk length, humans have the longest legs and shortest arms.
Ardipithecus ramidus (and Asu) has a proportionate longer trunk or torso than Homo sapiens.

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Approximate-body-proportions-of-Homo-sapiens-Ardipithecus-ramidus-44-MYA-hominin_fig5_287284201
One Oahspe skeptic claimed A'su looked literally like tree.
Notice above when Asu is compared to trees the similarity score is much lower (34.84%).
When I compared the drawing of Asu to the drawing of the TREE OF LANGUAGE the similarity score was only 26.68%.
-
Ardipithecus ramidus, unlike Australopithecus afarensis, ...has an opposable big toe — rather like a thumb on the foot — that would have allowed the species to grasp branches while climbing.
http://www.nature.com/news/ancient-human-ancestor-had-feet-like-an-ape-1.10342
Ardipithecus ramidus
Key physical features.
they had grasping abducted toe characteristic of gorillas and chimps
Above and below: much magnified and contrast enhancement view of Asu's feet and toes show an opposable
large curved big toe which would help Asu grip tree limbs.
Ardi - human origins
Ardi had an opposable large toe ...
Whereas Lucy had feet much like ours Ardi's foot had a long, curved big toe that would help her grip tree limbs but the other four toes were stiffer and flat which would have been helpful for walking on two legs.
http://www.age-of-the-sage.org/evolution/ardi_human_origins.html

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Measured similarity between Homo floresiensis (female) and I'hin (male) pictures 59.72% (60% very high).
John Ballou Newbrough's drawing of I'hin looks highly accurate when compared to Homo-floresiensis.
60.74% and 59.72% similarity are equivalent to 62% and 59% similarity on pictrieve.
58% is close enough (family look-alikes) on twins-or-not:
Notice above the orthographic projection lines from fossil anatomical reconstruction of Homo floresiensis to Newbrough's Oahspe drawing of an I'hin and the matching symmetry of middle calf muscle, knee, hand, bottom and middle of buttocks, elbow and lower back-top of buttocks, nipple-chest peak, top of shoulder-bottom of neck. Below head and neck of both original I'hin and Homo foresiensis match an extremely high 73.65%.
Above is a face to face head to head comparison of forensic reconstruction of Homo floresiensis
and I'hin (drawn by Newbrough) with 9 matching projection lines.

Homo floresiensis ("Flores Man"; nicknamed "hobbit"[2]) is an extinct species in the genus Homo.

The remains of an individual who would have stood about 1.1 m (3 ft 7 in) in height were discovered in 2003 at Liang Bua on the island of Flores in Indonesia.

This hominin had originally been considered remarkable for its survival until relatively recent times, only 12,000 years ago.[7] However, more extensive stratigraphic and chronological work has pushed the dating of the most recent evidence of its existence back to 50,000 years ago.[8][9][10] The Homo floresiensis skeletal material is now dated from 60,000 to 100,000 years ago;  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_floresiensis

The fossils of H. floresiensis date to between about 100,000 and 60,000 years ago.
H. floresiensis individuals stood approximately 3 feet 6 inches tall,
Year of Discovery: 2003
http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/human-fossils/species/homo-floresiensis

An arm bone, from a deeper level and dating to about 74,000 years old, is provisionally assigned to H. floresiensis.
https://australianmuseum.net.au/learn/science/human-evolution/homo-floresiensis/
 
The dating of Homo floresiensis fossils date to between 100,000 and 60,000 years ago with An arm bone dating to about 74,000 years old. The Oahspe dates for the origin of the I'hin race is about 73,000 years ago.
The geological time scale of Homo floresiensis (which resembled the Oahspean I'hin race) does correspond with that of Oahspe and Oahspe had this information 122 years BEFORE Homo floresiensis was first discovered.
Notice above the facial match of a Batwa pygmy of Uganda (on the left) with the
original I'hin (middle) and the Congo pygmy (on the right). Notice the same facial
and head proportions and symmetry with the same mid-forehead indentation
The Batwa, also known as Twa,...one of the first homo sapiens in the world with Kalahari San people.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
In the most likely scenario, a small group of short people split off from nonpygmy populations between 50,000 and 90,000 years ago. The founding group of pygmy ancestors ...
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2009/02/short-history-african-pygmies
Pygmy populations date back to between 50,000 and 90,000 years ago this corresponds with Homo floresiensis fossils dating back to between about 100,000 and 60,000 years ago
which agrees with the time scale of the I'hins according to Oahspe. 100k and 60k average 80,000. 50k and 90k average 70,000. Both 70,000 and 80,000 are very close to the 72,000 years origin time of the I'hins according to Oahspe.
Measured similarity between Homo erectus and Yak man pictures 60.07% (very high) below.
John Ballou Newbrough's drawing of a Yak looks highly accurate when compared to Homo erectus.
Homo erectus. Image from the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History.
Above is a orthographic projection of Smithsonian Homo erectus forensic facial reconstruct and Yak drawing by John Ballou Newbrough in Oahspe showing very similar match.
Above comparison of the skulls of Modern Man (Homo Sapiens) and Homo erectus and the head shapes
of the Oahspean races of Yak and I'huan. Modern human (Homo sapiens sapiens) corresponds to the
I'huan-Ghan skull-head structure type of Oahspe such as the rounded skull with high cranial
vault, and lacking the sloping forehead, and occipital bun (prominent bulge or projection of the
occipital bone at the back of the skull) outlined in red above. The primitive Druk-Yak skull-head
structure type
of Oahspe corresponds to the Homo erectus skull-head structure type (low cranial vault,
sloping forehead, and occipital bun) outlined in green above
Notice above the difference in John Ballou Newbrough's drawing of the jaw of the I'huan and the jaw of the Yak.
The jaw of the I'huan (outlined in red) is angled going down from the back to the front, matching the skull of a modern man (Homo sapiens).
The jaw of the Yak (outlined in green) is straight from the back to the front, level, matching the skull of a early hominid (Australopithecus or Homo erectus).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Above a very high (61.96%) similarity match of the Yak (from the knee up) to an Australopithecus (from the knee up).
John Ballou Newbrough's drawing of a Yak (with muscle lines and hair added) looks highly accurate when compared to Australopithecus.
The geological time scale of an Australopithecus is between Ardipithecus ramidus and Homo erectus.
-
The geological time scale for Homo erectus (from 2 million years ago till about 100,000 years ago, possibly even 50,000 years ago) does not correspond with that of Oahspe's time scale for Druks or Yaks (70,000 to 5,000 years ago).
https://www.livescience.com/41048-facts-about-homo-erectus.html
Some methods have dated these [H. erectus] to older than 200,000 years, others to less than 50,000 years.
https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/homo-erectus-our-ancient-ancestor.html
"less than 50,000 years" ago corresponds with that of Oahspe's time scale for Druks or Yaks (70,000 to 5,000 years ago).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1 minute 33 seconds into the video it says:
(3) The sequence of "race" creations is so ridiculously complicated as to be virtually an impossibility of ever occuring.

 
The newer data indicating the interbreeding of "modern" humans with Neanderthals is not incongruent with the history and chronology of the ancient races of man according to Oahspe. The first races of man were distinguished from each other by the more or less ratio of animal to angel who sprung from two common ancestors, one being the animal man the other, being angels materialized under certain atmospheric conditions unique to that time. The first mix occured around 73,000 years ago and resulting in humans being half animal half angel. They were diminutive, well shaped humans with short arms and longer legs with the ability to walk upright. They could also speak and were able to see and communicate with their angel forefathers. These were called I'hins. The second mix which was the offspring of I'hin and animal man, called Druk, were unable to see or comprehend spiritual things, neither could they walk upright or speak. Then the third mix, involving the Druks and the I'hins produced the I'huan, the equivalent of the first modern man.
 
The earlier Druk races had crossed with I'hins and produced I'huans at least 3 times since 72,000 years ago. Through interbreeding or "retrobreeding" back into the Druk races, the I'huans were lost as a distinct race after the first two times they appeared, the first time being around 72,000 years ago and the second around 39,000 years ago, according to Oahspe. The appearance of modern human fossils with archaic features approximately 40,000 years old, also co-relates with this second appearance of I'huans as detailed in Oahspe. (See reference below.)
 
The "modern human" DNA which scientists have found in Neanderthal (Druk) genes is consistent with the chronology of the ancient races of man as given in Oahspe. Modern (today's) humans, being a more or less hybrid of I'hin and Druk would be sufficiently similar to the earlier so called modern humans of 40,000 years ago as to have close to identical DNA (as they are both I'huan, the "hybrid" between I'hin and Druk).
 
The mixing of the I'huans (Modern Man) and Druks (Neandeathal) after the appearance of the I'huans about 39,000 years ago, is also consistent with DNA research suggesting cross breeding around 35,000 years ago. From Oahspe, it appears as though the I'huans remained distinct (I'huans being capable of of everlasting life, while the Druks were not due to the ratio of angel/animal heritage) right up until the cycle before Aph, being about 28,000 years ago (Oahspe, Synopsis of 16 cycles).
 
And here also is an interesting correlation between Oahspe's account and the fossil record, for it was 28,000 years ago that the fossil record indicates the last of the Neanderthals disappeared off the face of the earth. And even more recent changes in `modern' human to `more modern' human are also evidenced in fossil records. These also validate Oahspe's account of the continued interbreeding of the races, which led to the modern Ghans (beginning 18,000 years ago including a retrogression of Ghan and Druk in Ahura's time being around 8,000 years ago which was followed by the even more advanced Listians).
http://oahspestandardedition.com/OSAC/AncientRacesofMan.html

"The research adds to a growing body of evidence suggesting that sexual rendezvous between different archaic human species may not have been unusual.

Past studies have concluded that the forebears of modern humans in Asia and Europe interbred with other early hominin species, including Neanderthals and Denisovans. The new research is among more recent genetic analyses indicating that ancient Africans also had trysts with other early hominins." http://www.buffalo.edu/news/releases/2017/07/028.html

-
OAHSPE: The Lords' Fourth Book CHAPTER IV:
3. For the I'huans, even before the flood, were in the first place born capable of everlasting life. But they mixed with the druks until the seed of the spirit of eternal life became exhausted, and they brought forth heirs incapable of self-sustenance in heaven. Hence it was said of them: They went down in darkness.
The above I'huans mixed with the druks = half Ihuan/half Druk = 68.75 Asu, 31.25% heaven (below the threshold of everlasting life, 1/3 or 33.3% Angel blood, genetics).
This I'huan/Druk mix was born not capable of everlasting life in heaven according to Oahspe.
-
Hybrid skeletons sharing Neanderthal [Druk] and Cro-magnon [I'huan] features have been found in Portugal, proving that the two species did interbreed.
http://www.fact-index.com/n/ne/neanderthal.html
 
Coexistence and race mixing of hominids, not one evolved from the other.

"Homo Habilis and Australopithecus robustus emerged at the same time, 

it is very unlikely that one was the ancestor of the other." - Page 114 of 

The Mysterious Origins of Hybrid Man by Susan Martinez. 

Above is from pages 112-113 of The Mysterious Origins of Hybrid Man by Susan Martinez.

y-Haplogroups R and N are East-Asia haplogroups that are found in Europe.
These haplogroup lines connect East-Asia to Europe.

Above: y-DNA Haplogroup Cluster Tree with Geographic Origin. Below: haplogroup N (Y-DNA) distribution.

Above: Prehistoric migration routes for Y-chromosome haplogroup N lineage to Europe from East Asia[3][4]

Map above shows (in red) where Jaffeth fleet of pygmy I'hins landed in China-East-Asia (24000 years ago) from Pan in the Pacific Ocean, then interbred wth I'huan race (producing Ghans about 19000 to 14000 years ago) then migrated to Europe (about 12000 to 10000 years ago). Red on the map matches the red arrows of the Y-chromosome haplogroup N migration map above and the time periods match.

Haplogroup N (including N1c1) is found in Europe but according to DNA data it's coalescence age
(originated from a common ancestor) is 21,000 years ago in southern East Asia then migrated into
Northern East Asia into Siberia then west to Central Asia and Europe 8 to 10,000 years ago. The
DNA data and time periods agrees with the Jaffetic migration story in Oahspe after the submersion
of Pan
-
"your hypothesis seems to be confirmed by the westerly route taken by the jaffetic (china) faithists who kept migrating west, eventually to asia minor and Europe, when their lands (like Gobi) began to dry out. less than 10,000 years ago, these people began the main stock of Europeans."
- November 27, 2016 Susan Martinez, Ph.D (Anthropology, and Oahspe expert).
-
1 minute 33 seconds into the video it says:
(4) Oahspe texts are in contradiction to the angel-primate mating theory by specifically stating
that the true duties of the angels in question is that of teaching and resurrectiong mortals.
 
Oahspe Book of Jehovih: Chapter VII:
21. Jehovih said: I condemn ye not because ye have become joint procreators with the asuans; for ye have done two services unto Me; which are to teach yourselves corporeal things, that ye may understand and sympathize with corporeans, and, secondly, because ye have caused the earth to become peopled with such as are capable of immortality.

The creation of man, the first man, Asu:

BOOK OF INSPIRATION. CHAPTER VI:

16. Then, I made a new creation; giving feet and legs and bones to the animals I designed for the earth.

17. And when the earth was ripe for man, then I created him; male and female created I those of the second creation.

18. And man was dumb, like other animals; without speech and without understanding, even less than any other creature which I had created.

21. And man was unconscious of his creation, not knowing whence he came; nor knew he which was his own species.

22. And I sent angels to man, to teach him who he was, and to rouse him up to his capabilities, for which I created him.

CHAPTER XII.

1. Man only, of all My created animals, created I not perfect in his order, saith Jehovih. [he created A'su not complete, he was missing something]

2. The most devoid of knowledge, and the most helpless of animals, created I man.

3. I gave not to the bird to improve her feathers; nor yet to improve her species; nor gave I her a book as to the manner of building her nest, nor as to her behavior with other birds.

4. Nor said I to the hare: Beware of foxes, or go thou, teach thy young to depend on their fleetness.

5. And yet, both, birds and beasts, move by My inspiration, perfectly in the order I made them; the bird doeth her work, and the hare fleeth from the fox.

6. But the child of man will put its finger in a serpent's mouth, and the child will also eat any deadly poison.

7. Thus differently created I man from all other things on earth;

BOOK OF INSPIRATION. CHAPTER XIII:

26. Thyself I gave to thyself, and even at the zero of thy entity, I said: Go thou, make thyself. All other animals I created perfectly with Mine own hands, but to thee I gave liberty to make thyself, even as thou hast.

Man created blank, animals with instinct
Oahspe SECOND BOOK OF LORDS CHAPTER I:
17. Man inquired of the Lord: Thou hast shown the bird how to build her nest, and the carnivore how to scent the subtle track of his prey, and the spider to weave his net; but as to the manner of man's house, or as to herbs that are good or are poisonous, thou has not shown man.
18. The Lord said: All the instinct that is in the bird, or beast, or fish, or insect, or creeping thing, was created with them, but man was created blank; and yet man shall attain to more subtle senses than any other living creature.

Jehovih created man (Asu) unlike all other animals or beasts with no pre-program or instinct. Man (Asu) was created at zero, with no spiritual understanding, and being the first race of man (Asu) he had no (zero) inheritance (no previous or inherited genetics other than to reproduce after its' own kind) and therefore had no ability to improve himself, and was thus incapable of spiritual understanding and everlasting life. Asu was of the earth only, earthly. On the spiritual, intellectual (understanding), evolutionary scale Asu-man was between an Ape and a man (Charles Darwin's missing link) but he was created and did not evolve from an Ape or any other animal. Spiritual understanding and ability had to be introduced into mankind by genetics (spiritual capacity is recorded and passed on through the seed or DNA), cross-breeding with Angels that had spiritual understanding and everlasting life (angels = spirit-man, spiritual people with everlasting life). Asu did not have the DNA for spiritual understanding or everlasting life. The Angels have spiritual understanding and everlasting life in their DNA. Angels are at the high-end of the spiritual, intellectual (understanding), evolutionary scale. The Angels who mated with A'su had not fulfilled a corporeal (physical) life. The DNA of the Angels who mated with A'su would have been undeveloped in corporeal (physical, fleshly) characteristics. A cross-breeding between the first man (Asu) and the Angels who did in infancy or fetal would produce the first Homo sapiens (I'hins), with spiritual understanding, ability for everlasting life, but underdeveloped in physical characteristics (such as short stature, and physical weakness, etc...) but from the cross of those two Hominids (Asu and Angels) came Homo-sapiens and all the races of modern man.

A'su Man
A means without (like a-moral), Su means spirit. Without spirit means without spiritual understanding. Without spirit also means without the spiritual genetics for everlasting life.

"Pygmies are known for one trait, it is their short stature...the reason why these groups are so short and neighboring groups are not remains unclear."

"Pygmy height is one of those longstanding mysteries in biological anthropology,”

The origins of pygmies have long been a mystery. Researchers have debated whether African pygmies inherited their height from a common ancestor they shared long ago (angels who had never fulfilled a corporeal life, having died in infancy) or whether shortness evolved independently in each tribe because it was advantageous for life in the forest. The Pygmies are thought to be the first inhabitants of the African continent (the I'hin survivors of the sinking of Pan who sailed to Ham in their ships). Pygmies are often romantically portrayed as both utopian and "pre-modern," (the Heavenly angels and the I'hins lived utopian lives).

The Short Answer on Pygmy Height? Genes - ABC News

Hunt for genetic link to pygmy height yields clue : Nature News ...

A Short History of African Pygmies | Science | AAAS

Pygmy - New World Encyclopedia 

October 6, 2009
Research at the Univ. of Cambridge suggests that high mortality rates in small-bodied people, or pygmies, may be part of the reason for their small stature.
The study, by Jay Stock and Andrea Migliano, at the Univ. of Cambridge, helps unravel the mystery of how small-bodied people got that way. The article appears in the journal Current Anthropology.
Adult males in small-bodied populations found in Africa, Asia and Australia are less than four ft, 11 in. tall--about a foot shorter than the average U.S. adult male. Why people in these populations are so small remains a mystery, but several hypotheses have been proposed.
If death comes at an early age, then natural selection would favor those who are able to reproduce at an early age. But early sexual maturity comes with a cost. When the body matures early, it diverts resources to reproduction that otherwise would have gone to growth. So small body size could be essentially a side effect of early sexual maturity.
Stock's and Migliano's study provides the first long-term evidence for the mortality hypothesis. The researchers looked at over 100 years of data on three small-bodied populations from the Andaman Islands in the Bay of Bengal, south of Burma. When the British established colonies on the islands in the 1850s, these indigenous tribes had very different reactions to their new neighbors. Those reactions would have vast implications for the tribes' mortality rates.
Two tribes, the Onge and the Jarawa, resisted relations with the British, and retreated deep into the forest to avoid them. But the largest group of tribes, the Great Andamanese, befriended the British, some even living in homes built and supervised by colonists. In doing so, the tribesmen were unwittingly exposed to infectious diseases for which they had no defenses. As a result, the Great Andamanese experienced a sharp increase in mortality due to influenza, tuberculosis, measles and syphilis. By 1900 their numbers had dwindled to 600, from 6000 just 50 years before. By the 1960s, only 19 individuals remained.
Using historical records compiled by British researchers at the time, Stock and Migliano found that during the peak period of increased mortality, the Great Andamanese got smaller in stature. From 1879 to 1927, the height of the adult males who were measured decreased at a rate of 4.7 cm/100 yr.
Meanwhile, the Onge and the Jarawa, who for the most part isolated themselves from colonists and did not have dramatic increases in mortality, saw no drop in stature. The Jarawa, which have had the most stable mortality rate, remain the tallest of the three tribes today.
The relationships of the tribes with colonists "led to differences in mortality among these tribes, which appears to have been a fundamental determinant of variation in body size," the authors conclude.
This is first time that a link between mortality and body size has been shown using long-term data, the authors say. And it bolsters the idea that the reproductive trade-off associated with a short life could play a role in the evolution of human body size.
Source: Univ. of Cambridge
The parents of the I'hins all had high mortality rates (50 % died in infancy or fetal). The article says if death comes at an early age...early sexual maturity and small body size could be a side effect, well dying in infancy (including fetus and embryo) is as early you can die. The parents of the I'hins all died at an early age.

For example in the US: Lung cancer has a high mortality rate (46.0 per 100,000) vs thyroid cancer (0.5 per 100,000) which has a low mortality rate. Or another way to look at the data is to look at the mortality rate after 5 years with lung cancer at 83.9% vs 2.3% for thyroid cancer. Conclusion: lung cancer is a common cancer with with a high mortality rate. Thyroid cancer is an uncommon cancer with a low mortality rate.
The parents of the I'hins had high mortality rates of 50% before they passed their genes on to their offspring.
High mortality rate = Epigenetics = short stature of offspring = I'hins = Pygmies

(6) Modern biological data proves that all persons are of the same single race, not repeated ...
 
Modern biological data proves that all persons are of the same "species" as Oahspe agrees with.
Modern DNA tests proves that most humans are mixed with neanderthals, denisovans, and archaic humans.
DNA evidence shows that human evolution should not be seen as a simple linear or branched progression, but a mix of related species. In fact, genomic research has shown that hybridization between substantially diverged lineages is the rule, not the exception, in human evolution.[5] Furthermore, it is argued that hybridization was an essential driving force in the emergence of modern humans.[5]
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter V:
13. But because they can mix, and because that mixture can propogate, all the races of man are one and the same ...
 
Angel. A spirit man. Su, also, su-gan, and gans-spe
Angel and man = same species = Homo sapiens of the genus Homo.
This is why angels can interbreed with humans and can produce children that can reproduce.
“The Biological Species Concept.”
A species is defined as a group of individuals that, in nature, are able to mate and produce viable, fertile offspring.

A species can be sub-divided into races or ethnic groups, like breeds of dogs, each breed is a race but each breed of dog is the same species.
 
Asu and I'hin (the first and second race of man):
1 Corinthians 15:47 The first man was of the dust of the earth, the second man from heaven.
-
OAHSPE: First Book of the First Lords CHAPTER I.
4. And the name of the first race was Asu (Adam), because they were of the earth only; and the name of the second race was I'hin (Abel), because they were capable of being taught spiritual things.
1st = extremely physical, lacking spiritual. 2nd = extremely spiritual, lacking physical. 7th = not lacking in physical or spiritual developement.  7 represents completion or peak,
the 7th era at hand. The middle or center represents balance between two opposites. The whole universe is constantly seeking balance between two opposites. Balance is the one word of the Universal Law of Creator God. Asu-man had to be created first because man was created different from any other species or animal. Asu man was created without a pre-program or instinct, at zero, and therefore had no (zero, 0.0) ability (genes) for spiritual understanding. If Asu would have had the genes for spiritual understanding then that would have been a pre-program or instinct like the animals. So the genetic ability for spiritual understanding had to be added to man by cross breeding with the angels who had it, thus came the second race of man the I'hins. But the I'hins were lacking physically (which they inherited from their angel parents who had died in infancy on other physical planets). So the I'hins not being the perfection (completion, balance) of humankind had to cross breed with the Asuans to gain more physical ability. Although the Druks were physically larger and stronger than the I'hins, they still had too much beast (Asu) blood (genetics) in them (more than 66.6 %), and too little angel blood in them (less than 33.3 %) so the druks had to cross breed (mix) with the I'hins to produce the I'huan, the first race that was physically large and strong, and had spiritual ability.
Even with the racial mixing the I'hins were commanded to keep seperate and not breed with the other races, this was because it was important to keep them seperate and "pure" to be used as a breeding stock for spiritual genetics (ability), so racial seperation and race mixing was all part of the divine plan.
Oahspe Book of Cosmology and Prophecy: Chapter VIII:
7. Consequently the two most important periods for the prophet's consideration come within thirty-three and sixty-six, or, as they of old said, man and beast. In which measure man is divided into two parts (man and beast), and there is ever a percentage in his behavior inclining to one or the other, and they correspond to the vortexian currents of the earth.
-
Wisdom is needed here. Let the one with understanding solve the meaning of the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is 666. - Revelation 13:18
The genetic threshold of everlasting life is 1/3 Angel and 2/3 animal man (Asu) the mark of the beast is 2/3 or 666 of a thousand (credit Jim Dennon).
The mark of the beast is the mark of Cain the Druk, the warrior, the killer, the conqueror,  the conquistador, the enforced religion.
33 = spiritual dan and 66 = a'ji beast, 33 = 1/3 and 66 = 2/3 + 1/3 = 1 man.

The center of 33.3 and 66.6 is 50 (half of man). Man divided in two equal parts = 50-50 the center of 33.3 and 66.6.
The top half of man (see image above) is closer to the 33.3, the bottom half of man is closer to the 66.6.
"man is divided into two parts (man and beast)" = I'hin-Angels (man) and A'su-Druks (beast).
man is divided into two parts genetically (Angels and A'su). A'su like the beasts and Ardipithecus ramidus was created not capable of everlasting life.
Anyone looking at the fossil remains of Ardipithecus ramidus, Australopithecus, or Homo erectus and think they were capable of everlasting life in the spiritual realms are badly mistaken.
 
The Oahspe story of the origin of man (both Asu and I'hin) makes 100% genetic sense. After man (A'su) was created, the Creator (Jehovih) called out to his angels to come to earth and help man (Asu) who was helpless, crawling on his belly like a human infant. The Angels who had fullfiilled a corporeal life were like Jesus, they had overcome earthly fleshly desires, they had no desire for sexual intercourse or procreation. But the angels who had died in infancy would not have overcome fleshly desires, they would still be subject to corporeal desires such as lust, sexual desire (in a corporeal body, in the time of semu and a'ji).
They (the angels who had died in infancy) would be the ones tempted by sex and would procreate with Asu. The Creator Knew this was going to happend just as he knows what is going to happend to man when the earth and the solar system passes into a'ji, ji'ay, and dan (the proof is the ORACHNEBUAHGALAH plate 48. of Oahspe). That's why he sends a'ji purposely because he knows what is going to happend. That is why he sent the angels purposely to help Asu because he knew what was going to happend. The Creator created man, created genetics, created DNA, created nebula, a'ji, ji'ay, and dans and he knows what is going to happend. The Creator is not disappointed he made man or anything because he already knows the outcome.
Book of Jehovih: Chapter VI
16. And now was the earth in the latter days of se'mu, and the angels could readily
take on corporeal bodies for themselves; out of the elements of the earth clothed they
themselves, by force of their wills, with flesh and bones. By the side of the Asuans took
they on corporeal forms.
The earth in the latter days of se'mu played a major role in the sexual temptation of the
hosts of Seth-antes (the ones who had died in infancy or fetal would be the ones most tempted),
that was part of the divine plan to bring spiritual understanding DNA to earth humans
.
Semuan firmament and a'ji are the same or very similar.
OAHSPE BOOK OF JEHOVIH VI:5
...These that thou sawest are the aji, and the jiay, and the NEBULAE; and AMIDST
THEM IN PLACES THERE IS SE'MU ALSO."
OAHSPE PLATE 38 says "The Earth in semu. Jehovih saith; in the TIME OF SEMU
I brought the EARTH INTO A'JI
,...
 
6:52 into the video above it says:
These angels would be those who would be very disciplined and exhibiting high levels of soul-mastery, those who live in the heavens while following the All Highest constantly. These were hardly likely to start mating with their mortal students.
 
Oahspe - Book of Divinity: Chapter XIII:
17. So great was the power of a'ji that even the I'hins oft broke their vows and lived
clandestinely with the world's people, begetting offspring in great numbers, ...
 
Oahspe Book of God's Word Chapter XIX:
13....Hath not the Father given you an example in the I'hins? They kill not, nor take that which is another's; nor are given to lust, nor war, nor quarrelsomeness.

 
OAHSPE: Book of Divinity CHAPTER XIII:
16. And in eleven days thereafter, behold, a'ji began to fall on heaven and earth. The belt of meteoris gave up its stones, and showers of them rained down on the earth, and the sun became as a red ball of fire, and remained so for one hundred and sixty-six years. And the peoples of Arabin'ya and Vindyu and Jaffeth fell from holiness; the Zarathustrians gave up celibacy by hundreds of thousands, and married, and begot children in great numbers; many women giving birth to twenty and some even to five and twenty children. And some men were the fathers of seventy children, and not a few even of a hundred. And the Zarathustrians, even the Faithists with the mark of circumcision, went and married with the mongrels, and they with the druks, so that the foundations of caste were broken up.

Angels who died in infancy:
Oahspe Synopsis of Sixteen Cycles Chapter III:
23. ...born in the spirit world before their full time. And even so are others not of full birth who have not in the corporeal form begun to triumph in spirit over their own flesh.
"born in the spirit world before their full time", "who have not in the corporeal form begun to triumph in spirit over their own flesh".
-
OAHSPE: Book of Judgment XXXII:
6. ..Half the people, born into the world, including still-births and abortions, die in infancy. Therefore, there are a thousand million angel infants fetaled ...
7. These angels never obtain objective knowledge of the corporeal earth, but are compelled to learn subjectively earthly things through mortals ...
"die in infancy" includes still-births and abortions = angel fetus, prenatal.

Oahspe - Book of Lika, Son of Jehovih: Chapter VI:
1.  ...Jehovih's light descended on the High Arch, in the midst of the Rapons; and the Voice of Jehovih spake out of the light, saying:
5. To the corporean I gave two kinds of presence, objective and subjective.
6. And I magnified these two conditions unto the spirits of all men, that they might also appear objectively and subjectively in the places known to them.
10. And I created man and angels that all knowledge which is to be everlasting must be obtained objectively; yea, in the experience of his own person made I him to desire without end.
-

Oahspe Book of Jehovih: Chapter VII:
21. Jehovih said: I condemn ye not because ye have become joint procreators with the asuans; for ye have done two services unto Me; which are to teach yourselves corporeal things, that ye may understand and sympathize with corporeans, and, secondly, because ye have caused the earth to become peopled with such as are capable of immortality.
 
Difference between the beast and Spiritual man:

Animals are tropistic (involuntary response to external stimuli including a'ji) = no spiritual understanding, no eternal life as spirit.

Spiritual man is capable of realizing he/she is a Eternal Creative Causative Spirit responsible for his/he actions
= Spiritual understanding, eternal life as spirit.

Spiritual man is capable of connecting to (oneness with) Cosmic Consciousness (Jehovih) and entering the Orian state and even the Nirvanian
.

Animals, Ardipithecus, Australopithecus, Homo erectus, were not capable of Cosmic Consciousness or the Orian state (Book of Fragapatti Chapter XXVI:1).

Homo sapiens are capable of Cosmic Consciousness and realizing themselves an a Eternal Creative Causative Spirit responsible for his/he actions.

The more you are connected cognitively to Cosmic Consciousness and realizing yourself (and other Homo sapiens) as an a Eternal Creative Causative Spirit responsible for his/he actions (direct inspiration) the less you are subject to external stimuli (indirect inspiration).


Oahspe Book of Osiris, Son of Jehovih: Chapter XII:
8. On all corporeal worlds, Jehovih hath provided these two seasons for every race He created; a season for the development of the corporeal senses, and a season for the development of the spiritual senses. To find the mean between these is to find kosmon,
The mean is the average of the numbers: a calculated "central" value of a set of numbers.
http://www.mathsisfun.com/definitions/mean.html
 
Fractals (sacred geometry and mathematics of the Israelites) are a Key to how nature, the universe, and Jehovih operate:
 
fractal simulations for natural objects are created with a "seed shape that undergoes recursive replacement".
- page 12 of African Fractals. A'su seed shape undergoes recursive replacement by adding angelic genes (
I'hin) into the mix.
Like fractals the Kosmon race in Oahspe is created by additive recursive feedback loop
iterations:
-
0. A'su = no mixbreeding
1. start with seed shape A'su, breed A'su with Ethereans (who died in fetal or infancy) = output I'hins.
2. take the output I'hins and breed back to A'su = output Druk
3. take the output Druk and breed back to I'hin = output I'huan
4. take the output I'huan and breed back to I'hin = output Ghan
5. take the output Ghan and breed back to I'huan = output Kosmon.
hybridization was an essential driving force in the emergence of modern humans.[5] -
Number of iterations on the left (above). Takes 5 iterations of breeding to make the Kosmon race,
the goal of Jehovih. 
5 = balance (center of 0-10, 1-9) or mean. 5 is a Fibonacci number.
"Kosmon signifies an equal balance of material and spiritual"
http://www.angelfire.com/in2/oahspe3/mo9ent.html
Above illustration of the hominid races in Oahspe and the number of recursive iterations of mix-breeding to balance.
The most balanced complete "perfect" man (race) was created using fractal principles of
recursion and feedback loop according to Oahspe and the fossil record
(see The Mysterious Origins of Hybrid Man: Crossbreeding by Susan Martinez Ph.D. Anthropology),
this is the same way Jehovih created the fractal universe of nature which is different from the
Biblical story in Genesis
Like a fractal the races of man in Oahspe are generated by a recursive feedback loop of 5
iterations from I'hin to Kosmon.
Recursive feedback loop formula for generating the present and future races of mankind:
A'su = A, I'hin = C, Druk = D, etc...
A + B = C. (C is the output).
C + A = D (C is the first input that was an output).
D + C = E
E + C = F
F + E = G
Generating the present and future races of mankind involves recursion, self-similarity, scaling,
and infinity = Fractal.
I'hin, I'huan, Ghan, and Kosmon are self-similar to each other with everlasting (infinity) life.
The I'hin was half the size (scaling) of the I'huan, Ghan, and Kosmon (1/2 and 2x). The races
of man in Oahspe are generated by recursion (the output at one stage becomes the input at
the next stage). The output is a previous race, the input is the creation of a new (or different)
race. In the Bible, Man (Adam) is created whole complete and "perfect" at the beginning with
no build up or use of recursion or mix-breeding, the same with Noah. In Oahspe Adam (A'su)
was not whole or complete and neither was the I'hin. The way Oahspe says the races of man
were created agrees with the fractal processes of nature we observe everyday, the way the
Bible says the races of man was created does not agree with the fractal processes of nature
we observe everyday. 
What scientists call human evolution is just iterations of a recursive process of mix-breeding.
How the races of man in Oahspe is like a Fibonacci sequence (recursion):
Race-mixing = combining two numbers to produce a third = 1 + 1 = 2, 2 + 1 = 3 = Fibonacci sequence.
For the Ghan race Druk is replaced by I'hin (I'hin and I'huan are still two predecessors to Ghan).
"man is divided into two parts" genetically (Angels and A'su).
0 = not capable (without) of everlasting life as a spirit = A'su.
1 = capable of everlasting life as a spirit = Angel.

0 = Asu, 1 = Angels (binary 0s and 1s)
In the Fibonacci Sequence of numbers: 0, 1, 1, ... 0 = A'su without the DNA of everlasting life as a spirit,
the first 1 = angels with the DNA of everlasting life as a spirit, the second 1 = I'hins who inherited the DNA of everlasting life as a spirit.
0 + 1 = 1 (I'hin)
1 + 2 = 3 (I'huan)
1 + 3 = 4 (Ghan)
3 + 4 = 7 = completion (Kosmon, balance).
The number seven is one of the most significant in the Bible. Scholars say it denotes completeness or perfection.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/469565/The-magnificient-7-The-meaning-and-history-behind-the-world-s-favourite-number
OAHSPE GOD'S BOOK OF BEN CHAPTER VII:
3. I am the living mathematics;

Each race is the sum of its two predecessors:
A + B = C
A + B = two predecessors or input, C = sum or output.
The output becomes the input for the next number.
C + A = D and so on.
According to Oahspe even though the first manlike creation (A'su) was not the result of
mix-breeding he was the result of recursion (sum of its predecessors).
Oahspe BOOK OF INSPIRATION. CHAPTER VI:
19. Nevertheless, I had given to man, and thus made him, out of the dissolved elements
of every living thing that had preceded him.
Ouput becomes the input (recursive process of generating a fractal):
"out of the dissolved elements of every living thing that had preceded him". 
Oahspe Book of Inspiration Chapter I:
8. Thou wert nothing; though all things that constitute thee, were before.
9. These I drove together, and quickened.
Here (above) Oahspe explains how Jehovih created man (recursion), not from nothing, but
from that which was before, these parts Jehovih brought together (a creation).
-
5 minutes 10 seconds into the video it says:
Where is the beauty? Where is perfection of the Creator's Universe?
Where is the simplicity? Above is the recursive mathematical beauty, simplicity, and perfect balance of the race mixing of Oahspe.
The Fibonacci sequence "It's a simple pattern, but it appears to be a kind of built-in numbering system to the cosmos".
Fibonacci sequence (above) in nature = How the universe (Jehovih) works.
This simple, beautiful, perfect (complete), pattern (Fibonacci sequence) appears to be built into the development of the races of Oahspe.
Oahspe God's Book of Ben: Chapter III:
8. Man said: To understand the laws of the universe, this is great wisdom.
16. Jehovih said: I make no laws. Behold, I labor with Mine own hands. I am everywhere present.
21. Man inquired: How can I know if a thing be of God or if it be of nature? What is Jehovih more than natural law?
22. Corpor answered: What is nature, O man? Why wilt thou use a name for the members of my body?
23. Behold, the trees are mine; the mountains and valleys; the waters and every living thing, and everything that liveth not; they are me.
24. Why sayest thou nature? Now I say unto thee, the soul of all things is Jehovih; that which thou callest nature is but the corporeal part.
A flower or plant unfoldes over time.
Like the Fibonacci golden spiral Jehovih's plan and iterations goal of Kosmon has unfolded and been revealed in the book OahspeIllustration above shows how each race in Oahspe after A'su was like a quarter turn in a logarithmic self-similar growth spiral that show up in fractals in nature and the cosmos and also in computer generated fractals like the Mandelbrot set.
"It is readily observed that a correspondence exists between race [species] man and individual man in the development of the faculties. Individual man is the miniature of race[species]-man, and his unfoldment from infancy to maturity is a recapitulation of the unfoldment of the race [species from I'hin to Kosmon]." - pages 165-166  of SEVEN YEARS THAT CHANGED THE WORLD, 1941-1948 (1940) by Wing Anderson.

-
5 minutes 25 seconds into the video it says:
This bastardized offspring all gather together to form their own clan? They can form their own race communities? That's obviously impossible.
 
We see multiracial human communities in modern times, why not in ancient and prehistoric times? The mixed races of Oahspe formed much like the mestizos of Mexico and Central and South America. There are whole communities of Mestizos in Mexico, and central and South America.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mestizo
In North Africa, a large number of multiracial communities can also be found. Among these are the Haratin oasis-dwellers of Saharan southern Morocco, Algeria and Mauritania. They are believed to be a mixture of Sub-Saharan Africans and Berbers, and constitute a socially and ethnically distinct group.[6]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other excellent Oahspe scholars have said the druks were Homo neaderthalis also:
Augustine Cahill, author of DARKNESS, DAWN, AND DESTINTY (DRAWN FROM OAHSPE) 1965.
Ruth and Vernon, the experts who put together THE OAHSPE STANDARD EDITION!
http://oahspestandardedition.com/OSAC/AncientRacesofMan.html
Susan Martinez, Ph.D.(Anthropology) has the original Druks being Homo erectus and the latter Druks being Homo neanderthals, a half druk/half I'huan cross. Page 307 fig. 9.4 Family Tree of Man, THE LOST HISTORY of the Little People, 2013.
Perhaps Susan Martinez was right, perhaps Neanderthals were a half druk/half I'huan (modern man) cross.
Neanderthal did have mixed Yak-Druk and I'huan-modern man features. Although Neanderthals had a skull very similar to Homo erectus and the Yak drawn in Oahspe by Newbrough, they also had a height and arm length very similar to modern man.
 Above image shows I'hin standing just over 3 feet tall and Neanderthal skeleton just under 5 feet 6 inch tall and a modern man skeleton standing 6 feet tall. both the Neanderthal Man and the modern man look like tall "giants" compared to the I'hin. Neanderthals like the Druks of Oahspe were tall and stout compared to the small and slender I'hins.
Homo floresiensis (I'hin phenotype)
Homo floresiensis ("Flores Man", nicknamed "hobbit" and "Flo")
measured only three feet (one meter) in height and weighed about 70 pounds (32 kilograms), would have been very Hobbit-like indeed.
http://io9.com/5967785/new-interpretation-of-extinct-hobbit-species-reveals-a-human-like-face
-
Oahspe First Book of the First Lords: Chapter II:
4...the I'hins were small and slender, but the Druks were tall and stout.
-
Neanderthals (H. neanderthalensis), cold-adapted hominins with stout physiques,
Studies of ancient DNA extracted from Neanderthal fossils suggest our species may
have occasionally interbred with them
(Green et al., 2010)
http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/overview-of-hominin-evolution-89010983
-
Body height, body mass and surface area of the Neanderthals.
Trent University, Peterborough, ON, Canada.
Body size, expressed as height or stature, is an important determinant of many other
biological variables. Thus, it is surprising that many textbooks portray a wrong picture
of Neanderthal height as being "very short" or "just over 5 feet".
Based on 45 long bones from maximally 14 males and 7 females, Neanderthals' height averages between 164 and 168 (males) resp. 152 to 156 cm (females). This height is indeed 12-14 cm lower than the height of post-WWII Europeans, but compared to Europeans some 20,000 or 100 years ago, it is practically identical or even slightly higher.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9850627

Homo heidelbergensis ("Heidelberg Man") could be the direct ancestor of Homo neanderthalensis in Europe.
This human was tall, 1.8 m (6 ft.) on average and more muscled than H. sapiens.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Top-10-Extinct-Humans-62131.shtml
-
H. heidelbergensis are probably the descendants of Homo ergaster.
Homo ergaster was approximately 1.9m (6 ft 3) tall.
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Top-10-Extinct-Humans-62131.shtml
-
Homo neanderthalis men averaged about 5 feet 6 inches tall.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/evolution/humans/humankind/n.html
-
The average height of Homo neanderthals was comparible to modern Tutsi tribesmen.
-
Tutsi men average 5'7 ", but can range from 6 ft. 5 in to 7. ft. 6 in.) tall.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk%3ATutsi

Druks were larger and taller than both his/her parents (Asu and I'hin), and I'huans were larger and taller than his/her parents (I'hins and Druks) because of Heterosis.

Oahspe First Book of the First Lords CHAPTER II:
4. The I'hins were white and yellow, but the druks were brown and black; ...

Neanderthals like the Druks also had dark skin.
"Neanderthals living in what is now Croatia had dark skin and brown hair."
https://archaeologynewsnetwork.blogspot.com/2012/09/europeans-did-not-inherit-pale-skins.html

-
Any comments about Oahspe or this website? Email Me. I look forward to talking to you about Oahspe and this website

Enter supporting content here